On Oct 12, 11:45 am, Thomas Heller wrote:
>
> It is trivial to call ShellExecute with ctypes.
>
Yes, but it would be easier to use os.startfile() instead of
ctypes.windll.shell32.ShellExecute(), not? Further one must for sure
check the MSDN page for ShellExecute for the five parameters.
Then on e
On Oct 12, 11:27 am, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 12.10.2011 10:22 schrieb Christian Wutte:
>
> > Hello all,
> > as stated in the docs [1] os.startfile relies on Win32 ShellExecute().
> > So maybe someone can explain it to me, why there is no support for
> > progra
Hello all,
as stated in the docs [1] os.startfile relies on Win32 ShellExecute().
So maybe someone can explain it to me, why there is no support for
program arguments.
That's quite a pity since os.startfile is the easiest way for an
elevated run (with 'runas' as option) and without arguments of lim
