On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Jacek Krysztofik wrote:
>
> > Sorry for OT, but this is actually a question of mine
> >> if numbers % 2 == 0:
> > wouldn't the following be faster?
> >> if numbers & 1 == 0:
>
> You can answer t
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:09 PM, wrote:
> My understanding is that appending to a list and then joining this list when
> done is the fastest technique for string concatenation. Is this true?
Have you profiled an application and found string concatenation to be
a performance bottleneck? I would
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:01:04 -0700, Carey Tilden wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:43 PM, bvdp wrote:
>>
>>> Not to belabor the point .. but "func" is not a standard lib module.
>>
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:43 PM, bvdp wrote:
> Not to belabor the point .. but "func" is not a standard lib module.
> It's part of a much larger application ... and in that application it
> makes perfect sense to terminate the application if it encounters an
> error. I fail to see the problem wit
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:18 PM, wheres pythonmonks
wrote:
> Well I suppose it matters depending on the nature of the data you are
> looking at... But small function calls tend to be the death of interpreted
> languages...
I would be interested to see a real application that had performance
neg
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Ranjith Kumar wrote:
> I have described the theme of my project here,
It appears all you did was describe your project. Did you ask a
question or seek any specific guidance? Did I miss something?
Carey
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:42 AM, wheres pythonmonks
wrote:
> How does "x is not None" make any sense? "not x is None" does make sense.
>
> I can only surmise that in this context (preceding is) "not" is not a
> unary right-associative operator, therefore:
>
> x is not None === IS_NOTEQ(X, None)
>
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:18 PM, sturlamolden wrote:
>
> Perl is written in C++. That is not enough to make me want to use
> it ;)
I realize this was meant to be funny, but it's not true, and detracts
from the point you were trying to make. Maybe skip the pointless jabs
at Perl and stick to thing
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Joe Goldthwaite wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> Ascii.csv isn't really a latin-1 encoded file. It's an ascii file with a
> few characters above the 128 range that are causing Postgresql Unicode
> errors. Those characters work fine in the Windows world but they're not th
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:45 AM, a wrote:
> On 13 May, 16:19, Tim Chase wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 09:36 AM, a wrote:
>>
>> > this must be easy but its taken me a couple of hours already
>>
>> > i have
>>
>> > a=[2,3,3,4,5,6]
>>
>> > i want to know the indices where a==3 (ie 1 and 2)
>>
>> indexes =
10 matches
Mail list logo
