I've had much success doing round trips through the lxml.html parser.
https://lxml.de/lxmlhtml.html
I ditched bs for lxml long ago and never regretted it.
If you find that you have a bunch of invalid html that lxml inadvertently
"fixes", I would recommend adding a stutter-step to your project: p
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:49 PM dn via Python-list
wrote:
> When I first met it, one of the concepts I found difficult to 'wrap my
> head around' was the idea that "open software" allowed folk to fork the
> original work and 'do their own thing'. My thinking was (probably)
> "surely, the original
Received?
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 3:39 PM Buck Evan wrote:
> I started to send this to python-ideas, but I'm having second thoughts.
> Does tihs have merit?
>
> ---
> I stumble on this a lot, and I see it in many python libraries:
>
> def f(*args, **kwargs):
> .
I started to send this to python-ideas, but I'm having second thoughts.
Does tihs have merit?
---
I stumble on this a lot, and I see it in many python libraries:
def f(*args, **kwargs):
...
f(*[list comprehension])
f(**mydict)
It always seems a shame to carefully build up an object in order
