Rhodri James wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:56:12 +0100, Bruno Desthuilliers
> wrote:
>
>> Rhodri James a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:22:29 +0100, Roy Smith wrote:
>>>
My pet peeve is syntax-aware editors which get things wrong. For
example,
the version of emacs I'm using
Rhodri James wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:22:29 +0100, Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> My pet peeve is syntax-aware editors which get things wrong. For
>> example,
>> the version of emacs I'm using now doesn't parse this properly:
>>
>> '''A triple-quoted string. Some editors won't get this right'''
>
Esmail wrote:
> LittleGrasshopper wrote:
>>
>> So what do you guys use, and why? Hopefully we can keep this civil.
>
> I use Emacs, just because I have been using this editor for
> all sorts of things in the last 20+ years.
>
> I haven't been able to get the python mode to work for Windows
A bug
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Andreas Roehler wrote:
>> with python-mode.el from
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/python-mode/
>
> I think there's something wrong with the site because it tells me it's version
> 1.0 from year 2005.
You are right, so
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Andreas Roehler wrote:
>
>> IMO Jeremiah Dodds is right. With all the time spent on this discussion, you
>> could write the needed function in elisp probably. BTW your request seems
>> reasonable. Other python programmers may use it too.
>
&g
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
>
>> Eric, I don't have a good readily available solution to what you're
>> trying to do, but it seems to me that it would be worth your time to get
>> comfortable with elisp, and how it's used in emacs. The emacs
>> documentation is pretty good, ev
