Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 19:38 -0400 schrieb Terry Reedy:
> On 8/21/2011 7:17 PM, Andreas Löscher wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 14:52 -0400 schrieb Roy Smith:
> >> In article,
> >> Christian Heimes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 21.08.2011 19
Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 12:53 -0700 schrieb Laurent:
> > With 64 bit 3.2.2 on my Win 7 Pentium, the difference was 4% and with
> > floats (0.0 and 1.0), 6%
>
> For floats it is understandable. But for integers, seriously, 4% is a lot. I
> would never have thought an interpreter would have di
Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 14:52 -0400 schrieb Roy Smith:
> In article ,
> Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> > Am 21.08.2011 19:27, schrieb Andreas Lscher:
> > > As for using Integers, the first case (line 1319 and 1535) are true and
> > > there is no difference in Code. However, Python uses a huge s
> What the precise difference (semantics and speed) is between the
> BINARY_ADD and INPLACE_ADD opcodes, I dunno. Look in the Python source
> code or maybe someone knows it from memory :-)
>
> Irmen
>
from Python/ceval.c:
1316case BINARY_ADD:
1317w = POP();
1318
> if x in range(a, b): #wrong!
> it feels so natural to check it that way, but we have to write
> if a <= x <= b
> I understand that it's not a big deal, but it would be awesome to have
> some optimisations - it's clearly possible to detect things like that
> "wrong" one and fix it in a byt
Am Donnerstag, den 17.06.2010, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Andreas Löscher:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.06.2010, 08:18 -0700 schrieb Paul Rubin:
> > Matteo Landi writes:
> > > I could be wrong, but it seems functions are not marshable objects, is
> > > it right?
> >
>
Am Donnerstag, den 17.06.2010, 08:18 -0700 schrieb Paul Rubin:
> Matteo Landi writes:
> > I could be wrong, but it seems functions are not marshable objects, is
> > it right?
>
> Hmm, you're right, you can marshal code objects, but you can't marshal a
> function directly. It's been a while since
Am Sonntag, den 02.05.2010, 21:54 +0200 schrieb Andreas Löscher:
> Hi,
> I am looking for an easy to use parser. I am want to get an overview
> over parsing and want to try to get some information out of a C-Header
> file. Which parser would you recommend?
>
> Best,
> Andre
Hi,
I am looking for an easy to use parser. I am want to get an overview
over parsing and want to try to get some information out of a C-Header
file. Which parser would you recommend?
Best,
Andreas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You can do something like this:
>>> class A(): pass
>>> inst=A()
>>> exec("""
... a=1
... b=2
... c=3
... d=4
... """) in inst.__dict__
>>> inst.a
1
>>>
This executes the Statement in the exec function and uses inst.__dict__
as namespace. But be aware, that this is not recommended. If you mess
w
> import types
> import marshal
> def a(): pass
>
> > ...
> >
> s=marshal.dumps(a.__code__)
> f=types.FunctionType(marshal.loads(s), {})
> f
>
> >
> >
>
> What version of python do you have? If I try your code above I get :
>
> >>
Am Mittwoch, den 14.04.2010, 12:37 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Rossetti:
> Andreas Löscher wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.04.2010, 11:33 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Rossetti:
> >
> >> Paul Rubin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Gabriel Rossetti writes:
> >&
Am Mittwoch, den 14.04.2010, 11:33 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Rossetti:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
> > Gabriel Rossetti writes:
> >
> >> I am trying to serialize a function, class, etc and transfer it
> >>
> >
> > You mean the actual code? You have to use marshal rather than pickle,
> > the Python ve
> As you see, the traceback only starts from function c, which handles the
> exception.
> It doesn't show main(), a() and b(), which might however be (and are, in
> my case) critical to diagnose the severity of the problem (since many
> different paths would lead to calling c()).
This results
Am Montag, den 15.03.2010, 05:42 -0700 schrieb Michael.Lausch:
> On Mar 15, 11:40 am, Steven D'Aprano cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:43:02 -0700, Michael.Lausch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I managed to get confused by Python, which is not such an easy task.
> >
> > > The prob
Python searches for Variables not only in local or global scoop but also
in __builtins__. If you do something like __builtins__.os = os, than
this variable should be accessible global.
If you then write something like:
def B():
os.stat("/")
import os
Python recognises on compile
Hi,
unfortunatley I cannot reproduce your error. Which Python Version do you
use?
The expected case in this scenario is that the exception is thrown, as
you import os in A() where it is stored in the local namespace of the
function.
I tested it with Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 and in both cases an ex
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the right newsgroup, so if not don't hesitate
to tell me.
I am developed a Python to C compiler, so that Byte Code files
automatically can be translated into C Extension Modules. (And it works
pretty well --> http://www.coremountains.com/products/bytecoat/)
While deve
18 matches
Mail list logo
