> On 17 May 2022, at 05:59, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:27:58 PM UTC+8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 May 2022 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
>> declaimed the following:
>>
>>
>>> print(lst)
>>
>> Printing higher level structures uses
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:27:58 PM UTC+8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
> declaimed the following:
>
>
> >print(lst)
>
> Printing higher level structures uses the repr() of the structure and
> its contents -- theoretically a fo
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7:11:24 AM UTC+8, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:27:58 PM UTC+8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2022 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
> > declaimed the following:
> >
> >
> > >print(lst)
> >
> > Printing higher le
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:27:58 PM UTC+8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
> declaimed the following:
>
>
> >print(lst)
>
> Printing higher level structures uses the repr() of the structure and
> its contents -- theoretically a fo
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 8:48:27 AM UTC+8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 17:22:17 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
> declaimed the following:
>
>
> >
> >I tried with the repr() method as follows, but it doesn't give any output:
> I have no idea what 50% of those libraries
On Mon, 16 May 2022 02:03:26 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
declaimed the following:
>print(lst)
Printing higher level structures uses the repr() of the structure and
its contents -- theoretically a form that could be used within code as a
literal. If you want human-readable str() yo
On Mon, 16 May 2022 17:22:17 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
declaimed the following:
>
>I tried with the repr() method as follows, but it doesn't give any output:
I have no idea what 50% of those libraries are supposed to do, and am
not going to install them just to try out your po
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 12:49, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022-05-13 at 12:16:57 +0200,
> Marco Sulla wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:31, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > This is nearly the worst "specification" I have ever seen.
>
> > You're lucky. I've seen
Hello,
in coding, may be is a question of transivity in this code line. Thank you.
Philippe
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 13/05/2022 18:37, bryangan41 wrote:
Is the following LBYL:foo = 123if foo < 200: do()If so, how to change to
EAFP?Thanks!Sent from Samsung tablet.
The distinction between look-before-you-leap and
easier-to-ask-forgiveness-than-permission is weaker than yo might expect.
When you write
f
10 matches
Mail list logo