On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, at 13:35, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> When adding a timedeltacal object to a datetime, the fields are added
> from most to least significant: First a new date is computed by
> advancing the number of months specified [TODO: Research how other
> systems handle overflow (e.g. 2022-
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, at 07:11, Loris Bennett wrote:
> I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
> solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds, that I can convert back
> and forth from a format such as
A timedelta *is* a pure period. A timedelta of one day is 864
On 2022-04-19, Barry wrote:
>> On 19 Apr 2022, at 19:38, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> *I /think/ this is the year used for leap-day calculations, and
>> why some leap centuries are skipped as it is really less than a
>> quarter day per year, so eventually one gets to over-correcting
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 19:38, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> *I /think/ this is the year used for leap-day calculations, and why some
> leap centuries are skipped as it is really less than a quarter day per
> year, so eventually one gets to over-correcting by a day.
Leap century is skip unless
On 2022-04-19 19:23, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:51:09 +0200, "Loris Bennett"
declaimed the following:
If I am merely trying to represent part a very large number of seconds
as a number of years, 365 days per year does not seem that controversial
The Explanatory S
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:51:09 +0200, "Loris Bennett"
declaimed the following:
>If I am merely trying to represent part a very large number of seconds
>as a number of years, 365 days per year does not seem that controversial
The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac (table 15.
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 02:16, Loris Bennett wrote:
> I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
> solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds, that I can convert back
> and forth from a format such as
>
> 11-22::44:55
>
> (These are the lengths of time a job has
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> If I am merely trying to represent part a very large number of seconds
>> as a number of years, 365 days per year does not seem that controversial
>> to me. Obviously there are issues if you expect all periods of an
>> integer number
On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
> If I am merely trying to represent part a very large number of seconds
> as a number of years, 365 days per year does not seem that controversial
> to me. Obviously there are issues if you expect all periods of an
> integer number of years which start on a gi
On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
> Jon Ribbens writes:
>> On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>> I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
>>> solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds,
>>
>> That's exactly what timedelta is.
>>
>>> that I can convert bac
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
>> solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds,
>
> That's exactly what timedelta is.
>
>> that I can convert back and forth from a format such as
>>
>> 11-
On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
> I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
> solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds,
That's exactly what timedelta is.
> that I can convert back and forth from a format such as
>
> 11-22::44:55
I don't recognise that
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> Jon Ribbens writes:
>>> On 2022-04-19, Loris Bennett wrote:
I now realise that timedelta is not really what I need. I am interested
solely in pure periods, i.e. numbers of seconds,
>>>
>>> That's exactly what timedelta is.
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> On 2022-04-16 20:35:22 -, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> On 2022-04-16, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> > On 2022-04-16 14:22:04 -, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> >> ... although now having looked into the new 'zoneinfo' module slightly,
>> >> it reall
Op 16/04/2022 om 23:36 schreef Sam Ezeh:
Two questions here.
Firstly, does anybody know of existing discussions (e.g. on here or on
python-ideas) relating to unpacking inside lambda expressions?
I found myself wanting to write the following.
```
map(
lambda (module, data): result.process(
15 matches
Mail list logo
