On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:30 PM anders Limpan wrote:
>
> i would like to create a contact book were you can keep track of your
> friends. With this contact book you will both be able to add friends and view
> which friends that you have added. anyone interested in helping me out with
> this one
i would like to create a contact book were you can keep track of your friends.
With this contact book you will both be able to add friends and view which
friends that you have added. anyone interested in helping me out with this one
?=)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Stefan,
Yes, I often pass even fairly trivial functions like "add" or "+" or
whatever the language makes me say, to other functions in various forms of
functional programing. My point is that my example may seem trivial and not
necessary as an EXAMPLE of the greater point that may be easier to
und
Chris,
I was just about to suggest:
1+3+5+7+9
and
50*101
but that would mean helping with what does seem like fairly simple homework
with no effort to show us what they already tried and got stuck with!
So, ignore my attempts at trivial humor as I suspect some form of loop was
anticipated.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:23 AM Kian Kwame wrote:
>
> hi buddie
> am new to python somebody kindly advice the coding which will count odd
> number from 1 to 10 , and counting number from 1 tp 100
Sounds like homework. What have you written so far?
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:19 AM dn via Python-list
wrote:
> Back on-topic, I am slightly curious:-
>
> aside from 'starting small' with an option to widen/'open-up' later, is
> there a particular reason why 'the walrus' has not been made available
> (could not be ...?) for use with object-attribut
hi buddie
am new to python somebody kindly advice the coding which will count odd number
from 1 to 10 , and counting number from 1 tp 100
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 26/10/2021 10.45, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:42 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
> wrote:
>> Personally, I don't care what is done and suspect I will rarely feel much
>> need to use the current walrus operator, let alone an enhanced Odobenus
>> rosmarus operator like ::== ...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:42 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> Personally, I don't care what is done and suspect I will rarely feel much
> need to use the current walrus operator, let alone an enhanced Odobenus
> rosmarus operator like ::== ...
>
. wait what?
Ah. Had to look that one up.
We have had discussions debating if Python is a good language for teaching.
The short answer is NO unless you only teach a small subset and the students
know there is more they can learn as needed. The language is too rich and
has too many ways to do seemingly anything and that is before you add mo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:18 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
> Op 25/10/2021 om 20:39 schreef Chris Angelico:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:35 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
> >> By putting limits on the walrus code, you are not reducing complexity, you
> >> are increasing it.
> >> You are increasing complex
Op 25/10/2021 om 20:39 schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:35 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> By putting limits on the walrus code, you are not reducing complexity, you
>> are increasing it.
>> You are increasing complexity because you can't just reuse the code that
>> handles an ordi
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:35 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
> By putting limits on the walrus code, you are not reducing complexity, you
> are increasing it.
> You are increasing complexity because you can't just reuse the code that
> handles an ordinary
> assignment. You now need specific code to limi
Op 25/10/2021 om 18:06 schreef Avi Gross via Python-list:
> Antoon,
>
> Just to be clear. I am talking about a different measure of efficiency.
No you are not.
>
> The topic here is the Python run-time parser though.
Yes and that is what I am talking about.
> It is reading your code
> and doin
Mats Wichmann wrote at 2021-10-24 19:10 -0600:
>Have run into a problem on a "mature" project I work on (there are many
>years of history before I joined), there are a combination of factors
>that combine to trigger a KeyError when using copy.copy().
> ...
>There's a class that's a kind of proxy ..
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 3:07 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> I will end with this. If someone wants to design a new language from scratch
> and with a goal of starting with as general a set of concepts as they can,
> fine. Design it carefully. Build it and if it works well enough, use it.
I
On 10/25/21 10:48, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Mats Wichmann wrote at 2021-10-24 19:10 -0600:
Have run into a problem on a "mature" project I work on (there are many
years of history before I joined), there are a combination of factors
that combine to trigger a KeyError when using copy.copy().
...
Ther
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:20:52 +0200
From: Antoon Pardon
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: New assignmens ...
Message-ID: <5761dd65-4e87-8b8c-1400-edb821204...@vub.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 25/10/2021 11:20, Anton Pardon wrote:
> Suppose I woul
Antoon,
Just to be clear. I am talking about a different measure of efficiency. If
you have code that handles a limited functionality properly it can be quite
simple. If you then expand the code to handle ever more situations, then it
may do things like a series of IF statements to determine which
On 25/10/2021 02:57, Stefan Ram wrote:
GetKeyState still returns that the tab key
is pressed after the tab key already has been released.
Well, how then am I going to make my slide show stop the
moment the key is being released?
Does tkinter allow you to trap KeyUp (and KeyDown) ev
On 25/10/2021 01:46, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
No, many things need not be as general as possible once you consider how
much work it may take to develop code and how many bugs and oddities might
be introduced and even how much it may slow the interpreter.
...
I imagine you can create som
21 matches
Mail list logo
