On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:18 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> git diff-tree 1af743
> 1af743f411aa2b7278d1f1b3c30b447555ea55b8
> :100644 100644 b5908b5a36a4749e0bef2a16a2733a7461a818dc
> e00ba8738dbf3421288d31c60de9ee42a085c148 M auto-volume.py
>
> The first line is the commit hash, and then each subseque
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:07 PM Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> Hi folks.
>
> Is there a way of getting the McCabe Complexity of just the functions and
> methods (in Python) changed in a git commit?
>
> I found radon, and it looks good. But I think it wants to do entire files,
> no?
No idea about the co
Hi folks.
Is there a way of getting the McCabe Complexity of just the functions and
methods (in Python) changed in a git commit?
I found radon, and it looks good. But I think it wants to do entire files,
no?
Thanks!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, October 2, 2021 at 4:59:54 PM UTC+8, ju...@diegidio.name wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 October 2021 at 10:34:27 UTC+2, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > See the following testings:
> >
> > In [24]: a=3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971
> > In [27]: -a
> > Out[27]: -3.141592653589793
See the following testings:
In [24]: a=3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971
In [27]: -a
Out[27]: -3.141592653589793
In [28]: +a
Out[28]: 3.141592653589793
In [17]: ~-+1
Out[17]: 0
In [18]: -~+1
Out[18]: 2
In [19]: -+~1
Out[19]: 2
In [20]: +~-1
Out[20]: 0
I'm very puzzled by these opera
On Saturday, 2 October 2021 at 13:48:39 UTC+1, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, October 2, 2021 at 4:59:54 PM UTC+8, ju...@diegidio.name wrote:
> > On Saturday, 2 October 2021 at 10:34:27 UTC+2, hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > See the following testings:
> > >
> > > In [24]: a=3.1415926
Using assignment expressions in lambda functions sometimes works, but
sometimes doesn't.
Python 3.11.0a0 (heads/main:dc878240dc, Oct 3 2021, 10:28:40) [GCC
8.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
# Fine if it's a parameter to the lambda function
>>>
> On 1 Oct 2021, at 10:58, Shaozhong SHI wrote:
>
> Hi, Barry,
>
> In cases of automating checking, validation and producing reports in the
> context of data quality control and giving specific feedback to production
> teams, regex is perhaps the only way.
>
> Perhaps, we can give each ele
On Sat, 25 Sept 2021 at 02:11, Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sept 2021 at 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 10:56 AM Oscar Benjamin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 25 Sept 2021 at 00:37, Greg Ewing
>> > wrote:
>> > > I suppose they could be fiddled somehow to make it p
