Am 16.02.21 um 06:36 schrieb dn:
Pascal's value as a teaching language was that it embodied many aspects
of structured programming, and like Python, consisted of a limited range
of items which could be learned very quickly (in contrast to PL/I's many
'bells and whistles').
ROFL. Maybe that was
Am 15.02.21 um 21:37 schrieb Roel Schroeven:
So your claim is that your compiler is able to, or will be able to,
compile any language just by specifying a small schema file. Great!
Do you maybe have a proof-of-concept? A simple language with a simple
schema file to test the basic workings of
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:37 PM dn via Python-list
wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 17.57, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:52 PM Igor Korot wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, guys,
> >> Let me try to throw in another one - PL/1.
> >> This guys used to be very popular with the accounting community...
>
Python 3.7.10 and 3.6.13, the lastest security fix rollups for Python 3.7 and
Python 3.6, are now available. You can find the release files, links to the
changelogs, and more information here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3710/
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/
On 16/02/2021 17.57, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:52 PM Igor Korot wrote:
>
>> Hi, guys,
>> Let me try to throw in another one - PL/1.
>> This guys used to be very popular with the accounting community...
>>
>
> Actually PL/I is basically proprietary Pascal - from IBM. My
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:52 PM Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, guys,
> Let me try to throw in another one - PL/1.
> This guys used to be very popular with the accounting community...
>
Actually PL/I is basically proprietary Pascal - from IBM. My Intro Comp
Sci classes at the University of Cincinnati w
Hi, guys,
Let me try to throw in another one - PL/1.
This guys used to be very popular with the accounting community...
Thank you.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:51 PM Alan Gauld via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 15/02/2021 22:24, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> > Grant Edwards schreef op 15/02/2021 om 21:59:
>
On 15/02/2021 22:24, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> Grant Edwards schreef op 15/02/2021 om 21:59:
>> On 2021-02-15, Roel Schroeven wrote:
>>
>>> Is it your intention to not only compile procedural and object-oriented
>>> languages, or also functional languages such as Haskell, Ocaml, Scheme?
>>
>> And Pr
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 3:25 PM Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2021-02-15, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> Of all the languages I've used, Prolog was by far the hardest to get
> my head around. The dialect I used the most (which still wasn't much)
> was part of Digitalk's Smalltalk system. I don't
Ethan Furman writes:
> On 2/15/21 2:02 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2021-02-15, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>
>>> You said you used Usenet (and your reply here was via Usenet).
>>> Usenet posts to comp.lang.python don't go to the mailing list (the
>>> "here" that Ethan is talking about). Mails to t
On 2021-02-15, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> Haven't thought about Prolog in a LOOONG time but it had some wild
> twists on how to specify a problem that might not be trivial to
> integrate with other languages as our now seemingly censored person
> with much delusion of grandeur suggests. I
On 16/02/2021 07.09, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Thank you to those who pointed out this individual to the moderators. As
> Mr. Flibble accurately noted, he is not on the mailing list -- so his
> posts won't be here either.
Appreciating the work you(s) invest on my/our behalf!
--
Regards,
=dn
--
https
Grant Edwards schreef op 15/02/2021 om 21:59:
On 2021-02-15, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Is it your intention to not only compile procedural and object-oriented
languages, or also functional languages such as Haskell, Ocaml, Scheme?
And Prolog!
Ha, yes, that one was the next one I thought about,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:49 PM dn via Python-list
wrote:
> When I first met it, one of the concepts I found difficult to 'wrap my
> head around' was the idea that "open software" allowed folk to fork the
> original work and 'do their own thing'. My thinking was (probably)
> "surely, the original
Grant,
Haven't thought about Prolog in a LOOONG time but it had some wild twists on
how to specify a problem that might not be trivial to integrate with other
languages as our now seemingly censored person with much delusion of
grandeur suggests. It is a language that does not specify what to do b
And C.
Thank you.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021, 3:56 PM Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2021-02-15, Roel Schroeven wrote:
>
> > Is it your intention to not only compile procedural and object-oriented
> > languages, or also functional languages such as Haskell, Ocaml, Scheme?
>
> And Prolog!
>
> --
> Grant
On 2/15/21 2:02 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2021-02-15, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
You said you used Usenet (and your reply here was via Usenet).
Usenet posts to comp.lang.python don't go to the mailing list (the
"here" that Ethan is talking about). Mails to the list /are/ sent
here, but it's one-w
On 2021-02-15, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> You said you used Usenet (and your reply here was via Usenet).
> Usenet posts to comp.lang.python don't go to the mailing list (the
> "here" that Ethan is talking about). Mails to the list /are/ sent
> here, but it's one-way traffic.
That's new -- it always
On 2021-02-15, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> Is it your intention to not only compile procedural and object-oriented
> languages, or also functional languages such as Haskell, Ocaml, Scheme?
And Prolog!
--
Grant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Mr Flibble writes:
> On 15/02/2021 18:09, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Thank you to those who pointed out this individual to the
>> moderators. As Mr. Flibble accurately noted, he is not on the mailing
>> list -- so his posts won't be here either.
>
> ORLY?
You said you used Usenet (and your reply her
Mr Flibble schreef op 15/02/2021 om 0:32:
On 14/02/2021 23:00, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
I'm not saying that it is unfeasible or very difficult. I'm saying that it is a lot of work, and for a single
developer who has this as a side project / support for his graphics engine and who wants to bea
On 15/02/2021 09.50, Chris Green wrote:
> It isn't clear from the documentation. Does email.message.get() care
> about the case of the header it's getting?
>
> I checking mailing list mails and the "List-Id:" header is a bit
> 'mixed', i.e. it can be List-Id:, or List-ID: or list-id:, will
> email
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2021-02-14, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 14/02/2021 21:14, Chris Green wrote:
>>> What's the easiest way to change the first occurrence of a specified
>>> character in a string?
>>
>> By using a grown up (i.e. non-toy) programming language.
>
>
>
> [gotta love slrn's scori
Thank you to those who pointed out this individual to the moderators.
As Mr. Flibble accurately noted, he is not on the mailing list -- so his
posts won't be here either.
--
~Ethan~
Python List Moderator
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 15/02/2021 02:26, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> I think we have discussed this a few times.
Indeed, many times!
And there is a natural tendency for a group focused on a
programming language to fixate on language improvements. But
it's worth while to back up and look at real world scenario
On 2021-02-14, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 14/02/2021 21:14, Chris Green wrote:
>> What's the easiest way to change the first occurrence of a specified
>> character in a string?
>
> By using a grown up (i.e. non-toy) programming language.
[gotta love slrn's scoring feature...]
--
https://mail.pyth
After reading the thread i'm like: where can i try it out ...
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 16:38 Mr Flibble,
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I am starting work on creating a new Python implementation from scratch
> using "neos" my universal compiler that can compile any programming
> language. I envision this imple
On 2/15/21, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
>
> I downloaded Python 3.9 yesterday, added the root folder to path
> renamed python.exe to py39.exe and did
> py39 -m venv venv
> the output was
> No such file or directory but i dont remember the exact phrase
Probably you downloaded the embedded dist
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> On 14/02/2021 21:50, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > It isn't clear from the documentation. Does email.message.get() care
> > about the case of the header it's getting?
> >
> > I checking mailing list mails and the "List-Id:" header is a bit
> > 'mixed', i.e. it ca
Hi Terry,
Shai Berger found the bug and replied in Stack Overflow.
Thanks,
Uri.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:36 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2/11/2021 3:25 PM, אורי wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66161394/unittest-skip-doesnt-print-anything-in-py
Well i am no longer on the PC but here are some more info:
windows 10, 64bit
I downloaded Python 3.9 yesterday, added the root folder to path
renamed python.exe to py39.exe and did
py39 -m venv venv
the output was
No such file or directory but i dont remember the exact phrase
Kind Regards,
A
On 14/02/2021 21:50, Chris Green wrote:
It isn't clear from the documentation. Does email.message.get() care
about the case of the header it's getting?
I checking mailing list mails and the "List-Id:" header is a bit
'mixed', i.e. it can be List-Id:, or List-ID: or list-id:, will
email.message.
32 matches
Mail list logo
