On 2020-12-14 21:21, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
> >>> r = range(10)
> So r is a list containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
In Python 3.x, r is *not* a list. It is a custom object/class.
> >>> 2 in r
> True
> As expected.
I'm not sure what your replies are suggesting here. I demonstrate
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:23 PM Schachner, Joseph <
> joseph.schach...@teledyne.com> wrote:
>
>> >>> r = range(10)
>> So r is a list containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
>>
> To get a list of consecutive int's, you can use, for EG:
> r =
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:23 PM Schachner, Joseph <
joseph.schach...@teledyne.com> wrote:
> >>> r = range(10)
> So r is a list containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
>
To get a list of consecutive int's, you can use, for EG:
r = list(range(10))
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On 2020-12-14 at 21:21:43 +,
"Schachner, Joseph" wrote:
> >>> r = range(10)
> So r is a list containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
In a number of ways, r behaves as if it were that list, but r is
definitely not that list:
>>> r = range(10)
>>> type(r)
>>> l = [0, 1, 2, 3,
>>> r = range(10)
So r is a list containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
>>> 2 in r
True
As expected.
>>> 2.5 in r
False
Also as expected. If you did int(floor(2.5)) in 5 that would be true.
>>> r = range(1, 10, 2)
>>> 2 in r
False
>>> list(r)
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
Well, yes, becaus
On 12/12/2020 07:22, dn via Python-list wrote:
Has something happened to the Planet Python feed?
- Last update: December 07, 2020 04:48 PM UTC
Fixed! (Thanks!)
Although, still reported as an 'open' issue
https://github.com/python/planet/issues/446
--
Regards =dn
--
https://mail.python.org/mai
