On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:36 PM Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
> Am 30.08.20 um 21:43 schrieb MRAB:
> > On 2020-08-30 18:10, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> >> Well, with enough effort it is possible to build a system that is more
> >> useful than "entertaining". Google did that, English youtube vide
Am 30.08.20 um 21:43 schrieb MRAB:
On 2020-08-30 18:10, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Well, with enough effort it is possible to build a system that is more
useful than "entertaining". Google did that, English youtube videos can
be annotated with subtitles from speech recognition. For example, try
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 1:17 PM Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Each "source" symlink has its own inode. But if you os.stat() the
> symlink it follows the symlink and you get the inode for the "target"
> directory - two symlinks which point at the same directory will return the
> same
> inode and thus (
On 27Jul2020 20:20, Termoregolato wrote:
>Il 26/07/20 20:39, Dennis Lee Bieber ha scritto:
>>Since symbolic links are essentially just short files containing the
>>path to the eventual target file/directory, with an OS flag that the file
>>is a link
>
>Yes, I use them massively to give to a lot of
On 27Jul2020 22:19, Grant Edwards wrote:
>On 2020-07-27, Termoregolato wrote:
>> Il 26/07/20 22:47, dn ha scritto:
>>> Thus, compare the results of the two calls to detect a difference.
>>
>> I will try also another way, If I don't err symlinks and original
>> directory have the same inode numbe
On 2020-08-30, Barry wrote:
>* The child process is created with a single thread—the one that
> called fork(). The entire virtual address space of the parent is
> replicated in the child, including the states of mutexes,
> condition variables, and other pthr
On 2020-08-30 18:10, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 30.08.20 um 17:25 schrieb MRAB:
On 2020-08-30 07:23, Muskan Sanghai wrote:
On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 11:46:15 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
I recommend looking into CMU Sphinx then. I've used that from Python.
The results are highly
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:16 AM Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
> Am 30.08.20 um 17:25 schrieb MRAB:
> > On 2020-08-30 07:23, Muskan Sanghai wrote:
> >> On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 11:46:15 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> I recommend looking into CMU Sphinx then. I've used that from Pytho
OK, I was closer than I thought.
Two weeks ago, the concept of tkinter and these forms were totally new to me
as well as, about two days ago, python list was totally new too. I somehow
thought that "window.mainloop()" was supposed to be the last entry in the
function, silly me...
I did not think
Steve wrote:
> #What I cannot seem to do is to pull the adjusted
> #information from the form into variables, or a
> #list/array, so that can be used for the update to the file.
The updated data is in the StringVar-s, which, fortunately, you have
available in a list ;)
So:
> def EditDataByForm
# With this program, I can read the information from
# Specifications.txt file and display it on a form.
# The user can then update/modify the fields. This is
# all working fine and beeautifully...
#
# I now need to reverse the process and replace the
# adjusted lines of data back into the
Am 30.08.20 um 17:25 schrieb MRAB:
On 2020-08-30 07:23, Muskan Sanghai wrote:
On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 11:46:15 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
I recommend looking into CMU Sphinx then. I've used that from Python.
The results are highly entertaining.
ChrisA
Okay I will try it, thank yo
On 2020-08-30 07:23, Muskan Sanghai wrote:
On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 11:46:15 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 4:11 PM Muskan Sanghai wrote:
>
> On Sunday, August 30, 2020 at 10:57:00 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> > Am 29.08.20 um 13:51 schrieb Muska
It turned out to be "sticky=tk.W" instead of "sticky=tkinter.w"
Probably because I have "import tkinter as tk"
It does work though.
Mischief Managed
Steve
FootNote:
If money does not grow on trees, then why do banks have branches?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of
Steve wrote:
> How do I left-justify the information in the labels?
> SVRlabel = ttk.Label(window, text = SpecLine + " "*5)
> SVRlabel.grid(column = 1, row = x)
The text in the labels already is left-justified -- but the labels
themselves are centered inside the grid cells.
> On 30 Aug 2020, at 11:03, Stephane Tougard via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> I'm not even that makes sense, how 2 processes can share a thread ?
>>>
>> They can't. However, they can share a Thread object, which is the
>> Python representation of a threa
Stefan Ram wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
> >I went to sys.stdin but it didn't really lead me easily to the read()
> >method. All I actually wanted to know was what was the type of the
> >return value of the read() method which is different in Python 2 and 3.
>
> |>>> import sys
> |>>> >>> sys.st
for lineItem in range(len(ThisList)):
SpecLine, Spec = GetLineByItem(ThisList[y])
OldSpec = Spec
NewSpec = " "
SVRlabel = ttk.Label(window, text = SpecLine + " "*5)
SVRlabel.grid(column = 1, row = x)
NewSpec = tk
Yes, that first option worked.
Special thanks...
Steve
===
Footnote:
If 666 is considered evil, then technically, 25.8069758 is the root of all
evil.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Peter Otten
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 5:29 AM
To: python
On 2020-08-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I'm not even that makes sense, how 2 processes can share a thread ?
>>
> They can't. However, they can share a Thread object, which is the
> Python representation of a thread. That can lead to confusion, and
> possibly the OP's error (I don't know for sure,
Steve wrote:
> Compiles, no syntax errors however, line 82 seems to run only once when
> the FOR loop has completed.
> Why is that? All fields are to contain the specifications, not just the
> last one.
It seems that passing the StringVar to the Entry widget is not sufficient to
keep it alive.
> On 29 Aug 2020, at 18:01, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:24:10 +1000, John O'Hagan
> declaimed the following:
>
>> There's no error without the sleep(1), nor if the Process is started
>> before the Thread, nor if two Processes are used instead, nor if two
>> Threads ar
Compiles, no syntax errors however, line 82 seems to run only once when the
FOR loop has completed.
Why is that? All fields are to contain the specifications, not just the
last one.
Steve
--
T
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:01:12 -0400
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:24:10 +1000, John O'Hagan
> declaimed the following:
>
> >There's no error without the sleep(1), nor if the Process is started
> >before the Thread, nor if two Processes are used instead, nor if two
> >Threads
MRAB wrote:
> On 2020-08-29 17:48, Chris Green wrote:
> > Stefan Ram wrote:
> >> Chris Green writes:I can't find the documentation for
> >> >read(). It's not a built-in function and it's not documented with
> >> >(for example) the file type object sys.stdin.
> >>
> >> |read() (asyncio.Stre
Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/29/2020 12:18 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> > Well it sounds a silly question but I can't find the documentation for
> > read(). It's not a built-in function and it's not documented with
> > (for example) the file type object sys.stdin.
>
> sys.stdin is of no particular type
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 29Aug2020 16:50, Chris Green wrote:
> >However the problem appears to be that internally in Python 3 mailbox
> >class there is an assumption that it's being given 'ascii'. Here's
> >the error (and I'm doing no processing of the message at all):-
> >
> >Traceback (
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > However the problem appears to be that internally in Python 3 mailbox
> > class there is an assumption that it's being given 'ascii'.
>
> Do you really _need_ the mailbox class ? From what you've
> written so far my understanding was that you receive data
> (bytes) and
> On Aug 29, 2020, at 10:12 PM, Stephane Tougard via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-29, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> Under Linux, multiprocessing creates processes using fork(). That means
>> that, for some fraction of time, you have TWO processes sharing the same
>> thread and all t
29 matches
Mail list logo
