>
> A matter of style, which I like to follow [is it TDD's influence? - or
> does it actually come-from reading about DBC (Design by Contract*)?] is
> the injunction that one *not* vary the value of a parameter inside a
> method/function.
> (useful in 'open-box testing' to check both the API and th
Hi
I have a trouble in installing basemap in my local Jupyter Notebook.
I used the code below. But it did not work.
!conda install -c conda-forge basemap==1.3.0 matplotlib==2.2.2 -y
How can I install basemap in my Jupyter Notebook?
Thanks
Best Regards
Mich
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
On 7/07/20 7:44 PM, Kyle Stanley wrote:
Can you explain why these two (apparently) logical assignment processes
have been designed to realise different result-objects?
The reason is because of the conventions chosen in PEP 3132, which
implemented the feature in the first place. It wa
On 7/07/20 7:21 PM, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
Original message
For comparison, here's the original form:-
>>> def f( a, *b, c=0 ):
... print( a, type( a ) )
... print( c, type( c ) )
... print( b )
...
>>> f( 1, 'two', 3, 'four' )
1
0
('two', 3, 'four')
Shouldn't
On 8/07/20 12:45 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:28 PM Frank Millman wrote:
Hi all
After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
Yes, it's guaranteed. It isn't often useful; but the
Try jsonlight.dumps it'll just work.
Le mar. 7 juil. 2020 à 12:53, Adam Funk a écrit :
> On 2020-07-06, Adam Funk wrote:
>
> > On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> While I agree entirely with your point, there i
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:37 AM Adam Funk wrote:
> Is there a "bulletproof" version of json.dump somewhere that will
> convert bytes to str, any other iterables to list, etc., so you can
> just get your data into a file & keep working?
>
Is the data only being read by python programs? If so, cons
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:28 PM Frank Millman wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
> In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
>
Yes, it's guaranteed. It isn't often useful; but the variant where
there's a "break" in th
On 2020-07-07, Frank Millman wrote:
> After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
> In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
...
> Is this guaranteed in Python, or should it not be relied on?
It is guaranteed, *except* if the sequence is empty an
Hi all
After iterating over a sequence, the final element is still accessible.
In this case, the variable 'i' still references the integer 4.
Python 3.8.2 (tags/v3.8.2:7b3ab59, Feb 25 2020, 23:03:10) [MSC v.1916 64
bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for mo
On 2020-07-06, Adam Funk wrote:
> On 2020-07-06, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jon Ribbens via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>> While I agree entirely with your point, there is however perhaps room
>>> for a bit more helpfulness from the json module. There is no sensible
>>> r
>
> Can you explain why these two (apparently) logical assignment processes
> have been designed to realise different result-objects?
The reason is because of the conventions chosen in PEP 3132, which
implemented the feature in the first place. It was considered to return a
tuple for the consiste
Original message From: dn via Python-list
Date: 7/7/20 16:04 (GMT+10:00) To: 'Python'
Subject: Questioning the effects of multiple
assignment TLDR; if you are a Python 'Master' then feel free to skim the first
part (which you should know hands-down), until the excerpts fro
13 matches
Mail list logo
