On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 at 9:13:09 AM UTC-5, Jeff Gitlin wrote:
> With the new operator := in Python 3.8
> that allows you to do things like
>
> if ( x := f() ) == 1:
>
> Is there any reason to use just the assignment operator?
………..
Thanks. That web page is exactly what I was lookin
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 4:21 AM Jeff Gitlin wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 at 9:22:56 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:16 AM Jeff Gitlin wrote:
> > >
> > > With the new operator := in Python 3.8
> > > that allows you to do things like
> > >
> > > if ( x :=
On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 at 9:22:56 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:16 AM Jeff Gitlin wrote:
> >
> > With the new operator := in Python 3.8
> > that allows you to do things like
> >
> > if ( x := f() ) == 1:
> >
> > Is there any reason to use just the assignment
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 3:41 AM Manomugdha Biswas wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a Linux C binary (executable, not .so file). i can update (add new
> files/folders if it is required) but after compilation i will get a binary
> executable file.
> I want to access/call few functions of this executable from
Hi,
I have a Linux C binary (executable, not .so file). i can update (add new
files/folders if it is required) but after compilation i will get a binary
executable file.
I want to access/call few functions of this executable from python. for
this i want to use cython interface (most probably cython
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:16 AM Jeff Gitlin wrote:
>
> With the new operator := in Python 3.8
> that allows you to do things like
>
> if ( x := f() ) == 1:
>
> Is there any reason to use just the assignment operator?
I don't understand the question. Are you asking why the normal "="
operator shou
With the new operator := in Python 3.8
that allows you to do things like
if ( x := f() ) == 1:
Is there any reason to use just the assignment operator?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
