Le 22/12/2019 à 23:50, Stefan Ram a écrit :
Batuhan Taskaya writes:
dont like this for _ in range(n): do() thing. Any suggestions?
The participants of my beginner classes like to write:
n * do()
for that purpose, but usuallythis does not work as intended!
What would work sometimes
On 2019-12-22 23:34, Batuhan Taskaya wrote:
> I encounter with cases like doing a function 6 time with no
> argument, or same arguments over and over or doing some structral
> thing N times and I dont know how elegant I can express that to the
> code. I dont know why but I dont like this
>
> for _
Am 22.12.2019 um 21:34 schrieb Batuhan Taskaya:
> I encounter with cases like doing a function 6 time with no argument, or
> same arguments over and over or doing some structral thing N times and I
> dont know how elegant I can express that to the code. I dont know why but I
> dont like this for _
On 12/22/19 3:34 PM, Batuhan Taskaya wrote:
> I encounter with cases like doing a function 6 time with no argument, or
> same arguments over and over or doing some structral thing N times and I
> dont know how elegant I can express that to the code. I dont know why but I
> dont like this for _ in r
I encounter with cases like doing a function 6 time with no argument, or
same arguments over and over or doing some structral thing N times and I
dont know how elegant I can express that to the code. I dont know why but I
dont like this for _ in range(n): do() thing. Any suggestions?
--
https://ma
On 11/12/19 1:07 AM, Daniel Haude wrote:
Hello Neil,
thanks for the detailed answer.
Question: are there other people/factors who/which should be regarded
as more important than the linter's opinion?
Yes. Mine.
Um, see below...
(unless humor)
I was just puzzled at the linter's output (took
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 4:20 AM wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 04:52:33 +1100
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:45 AM wrote:
> > > BTW, the canonical way to upload files via http is PUT, not POST.
> > > You might want to look into that, but here it is off-topic.
> >
> > Cit
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 04:52:33 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:45 AM wrote:
> > BTW, the canonical way to upload files via http is PUT, not POST.
> > You might want to look into that, but here it is off-topic.
>
> Citation needed.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#pag
I have to prepare e-mail in python (e-mail address, body html, attachments
etc.) and show Outlook window for user who will check everything and correct if
necessary and will be able to send it.
My script work well :
o = win32com.client.Dispatch("Outlook.Application")
Msg = o.CreateItem(0)
Msg.T
On Saturday, 21 December 2019 21:46:43 UTC, Ben Hearn wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having a bit of trouble with a string mismatch operation in my tool I am
> writing.
>
> I am comparing a database collection or url quoted paths to the paths on the
> users drive.
>
> These 2 paths look identic
Yes thank you. The package is not compatible with 3.x.
Regards,
Mahmood
On Saturday, December 21, 2019, 1:40:29 AM GMT+3:30, Barry
wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2019, at 15:27, Mahmood Naderan via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I can install collect with pip for python2.7
> $ pip install
11 matches
Mail list logo
