On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:36 PM DL Neil wrote:
>
> On 3/08/19 4:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > I currently work on my home machine, so my recent 'pair programming' has
> > been limited to comments and now diff suggestions on Github PRs. So I
> > need the comments on real use cases from you and Chri
On 3/08/19 4:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/2/2019 4:52 PM, DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 8:32 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically sepa
On 03Aug2019 08:52, DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 8:32 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
2. Do two systems connect directly peer-to-peer or through a server?
Exclusively the latter (thus far in the investigation).
If one party is remote and both are behind a NAT (_very_ common in
Australia, for example)
On 03Aug2019 16:51, DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 11:50 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
appear.in can also screen share along with its video conferencing,
and I imagine Zoom might do so also. But a screen share is "read
only" for the other party. You could both screen share of course,
but it doesn't s
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:11 AM DL Neil wrote:
>
> Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
> effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
> geographically separate.
>
At work (not programming related) my department has just started using
GoToMeeting. So far i
On 3/08/19 11:50 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
appear.in can also screen share along with its video conferencing, and I
imagine Zoom might do so also. But a screen share is "read only" for the
other party. You could both screen share of course, but it doesn't solve
the keep-the-code-in-sync issue.
On 8/2/2019 4:44 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
in response to my enquiries
Not the OP, but weighing in from personal experience: I've often pair
programmed using just a video call service (with screen share). The
biggest downside is that it has to share the full image of the screen,
which means it
On 8/2/2019 4:52 PM, DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 8:32 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically separate.
'geographically separate' could ra
On 8/1/2019 4:06 PM, Daniel Okey-Okoro wrote:
I think that adding a `no` keyword as an alias for `not` would make for
more readable, simple, pythonic code.
I am 99.99% sure that this would not be accepted. However, the
discussion of the not operator is worth at least a blog post.
--
Terry J
Batuhan Taskaya於 2019年8月3日星期六 UTC+8上午5時27分49秒寫道：
> functools.partial is a better option
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 1:25 AM Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> > On 31Jul2019 19:16, Jach Fong wrote:
> > >I get a package from Pypi. The package has many modules using built-in
> > open() function. I like to r
On 03Aug2019 11:39, DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 10:34 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:30 AM DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 8:44 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Google Hangouts, or a proprietary internal platform ("Owl") which does
similar things but is better able to handle different b
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:40 AM DL Neil wrote:
> > Basically, what I'd be interested in seeing is a multi-player game of
> > Notepad++, in contrast to IRC. http://www.bash.org/?85514
>
> With the ability to frag your pair-programmer when (s)he makes a
> mistake? Remind me never to 'pair' with you!
On 3/08/19 10:34 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:30 AM DL Neil wrote:
On 3/08/19 8:44 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Google Hangouts, or a proprietary internal platform ("Owl") which does
similar things but is better able to handle different bandwidth
connections.
Thanks. Will
On 3/08/19 8:57 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 21:10:32 +1200, DL Neil
declaimed the following:
- AWS Cloud9: (apparently will run on a small, free, cloud-server)
Cloud9 is normally available on BeagleBone Black cards (though you'd
have to open up your firewalls and m
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:30 AM DL Neil wrote:
>
> On 3/08/19 8:44 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > programmed using just a video call service (with screen share). The
>
> TeamViewer, and similar?
> I didn't mention this earlier, perhaps being carried-away by my
> enthusiasm for 'there must be a bette
A truly marvellous aspect of Python is its world-wide spread! Many
people use Python with greater ease than they speak or write English,
despite Python appearing to be a sub-set of the English language!
Native English-speakers often* have difficulty following
negatively-worded sentences, eg "
On Aug 1, 2019, at 13:38, Daniel Okey-Okoro wrote:
>
>
> > not a strong enough justification for breaking any code that uses "no" in
> > any other way.
>
> This is a very crucial point I didn't consider.
>
>
>
> What if we could le
On 3/08/19 8:44 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 6:34 AM Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically separate.
'geographically
functools.partial is a better option
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 1:25 AM Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 31Jul2019 19:16, Jach Fong wrote:
> >I get a package from Pypi. The package has many modules using built-in
> open() function. I like to redefine all the open() there with the default
> encoding 'utf-8
On 3/08/19 8:32 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically separate.
'geographically separate' could range from in the same room to a
conti
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 6:34 AM Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
> > Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
> > effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
> > geographically separate.
>
> 'geographically separate' could range from
On 8/2/2019 5:10 AM, DL Neil wrote:
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically separate.
'geographically separate' could range from in the same room to a
continent away, as long as two people have
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 08:37, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use pycurl to obtain the download speed in real-time for a huge
> file. Is this possible or not?
Yes
> Any hints on this issue?
Google for python pycurl progress
Barry
>
> Regards
> --
> .: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zha
Please recommend a Python-friendly, bandwidth-respectful, (but
effective) system for pair-programming; where the 'pair' are
geographically separate.
Next week is the local PUG's next meeting (details below) billed as a
"Python Hands-On Coding night". I shall be travelling, so can't attend
in
Hi,
I want to use pycurl to obtain the download speed in real-time for a huge
file. Is this possible or not?
Any hints on this issue?
Regards
--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
25 matches
Mail list logo
