On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:31 AM Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
> Roel Schroeven :
> > In the absence of any other mention of bindings being removed, to me
> > it seems clear that bindings are not automatically removed. Otherwise
> > many things become ambiguous. Example: the documentation for dicts
> > de
Roel Schroeven :
> In the absence of any other mention of bindings being removed, to me
> it seems clear that bindings are not automatically removed. Otherwise
> many things become ambiguous. Example: the documentation for dicts
> defines "d[key] = value" as "Set d[key] to value". Does that mean it
On 2/28/2019 11:09 AM, ast wrote:
Hello
I just uploaded a package on pypi, whose name is "arith_lib"
The strange thing is that on pypi the package is renamed "arith-lib"
The underscore is substitued with a dash
If we search for this package:
pip search arith
arith-lib (2.0.0) - A set of func
On 2/28/2019 11:19 AM, Mihir Kothari wrote:
I am not sure if this is the right list, but trying to get help from
experienced python users for my issue.
This is a good place to get a somewhat different set of such people.
I have posted the issue in stackoverflow, but yet to see any response.
Rhodri James schreef op 28/02/2019 om 13:09:
On 27/02/2019 21:39, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Rhodri James schreef op 27/02/2019 om 15:18:
Aren't we overthinking this?
I think it's pretty clear that a variable is never deleted before it
goes out of scope. A quick search in the documentation points me
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the right list, but trying to get help from
experienced python users for my issue.
I have posted the issue in stackoverflow, but yet to see any response. I am
trying my luck here.
I have my question here: https://stackoverflow.com/q/54833834/3165644
If needed, I can
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 16:14, ast wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I just uploaded a package on pypi, whose name is "arith_lib"
>
> The strange thing is that on pypi the package is renamed "arith-lib"
> The underscore is substitued with a dash
The version with a dash is the normalised form of the name - see
Anthony,
On 28/02/19 10:18 PM, Anthony Flury via Python-list wrote:
I am trying to write an extension module with a function (actually an
__init__ method, but I am not sure that matters) where the function can
be called as either :
my_func()
or
my_func( a, b, c, d) - where a,b,c,d a
Hello
I just uploaded a package on pypi, whose name is "arith_lib"
The strange thing is that on pypi the package is renamed "arith-lib"
The underscore is substitued with a dash
If we search for this package:
pip search arith
arith-lib (2.0.0) - A set of functions for miscellaneous arithmetic
Hi,
I'm trying to wrap my head around an OSX app which has python embedded.
This works fine if I run the build on the same machine as it is build on.
However when using Travis to build the app I can only get it to run from
the terminal. A double click on the appdir (or using open) results in
Chris Angelico :
> What if an exception gets raised at some point before the function has
> returned? The exception object will give full access to the function's
> locals.
It wouldn't hurt for the Python gods to make an explicit ruling on the
matter.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:13 PM Rhodri James wrote:
>
> On 27/02/2019 21:39, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> > Rhodri James schreef op 27/02/2019 om 15:18:
> > Aren't we overthinking this?
> >
> > I think it's pretty clear that a variable is never deleted before it
> > goes out of scope. A quick search i
On 27/02/2019 21:39, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Rhodri James schreef op 27/02/2019 om 15:18:
Aren't we overthinking this?
I think it's pretty clear that a variable is never deleted before it
goes out of scope. A quick search in the documentation points me to
(https://docs.python.org/3/reference/dat
Anthony Flury via Python-list schrieb am 28.02.19 um 10:18:
> I am trying to write an extension module with a function (actually an
> __init__ method, but I am not sure that matters) where the function can be
> called as either :
>
> my_func()
>
> or
>
> my_func( a, b, c, d) - where a,b,
I am trying to write an extension module with a function (actually an
__init__ method, but I am not sure that matters) where the function can
be called as either :
my_func()
or
my_func( a, b, c, d) - where a,b,c,d are all doubles.
I would prefer not to allow the function to be called
Alan Bawden :
> Gregory Ewing writes:
>
>> Alan Bawden wrote:
>> > the Java Language
>> > Specification contains the following language:
>> >Optimizing transformations of a program can be designed that reduce
>> >the number of objects that are reachable to be less than those which
>> >
16 matches
Mail list logo
