On 2018-08-08 00:07, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote:
> The highest version of openssl available on my system is 1.0.0 which
> is not good enough for pip these days (or github for that matter). So
> I've installed 1.1.0 to a custom location /home/fetch/opt. But if I do
>
> import ssl
> ssl.OPEN
The highest version of openssl available on my system is 1.0.0 which
is not good enough for pip these days (or github for that matter). So
I've installed 1.1.0 to a custom location /home/fetch/opt. But if I do
import ssl
ssl.OPENSSL_VERSION
it still shows me that it is using the system default 1.
giannis.dafnomi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hey Peter.
>
> This worked like a charm! I can't believe I did not think of that, after
> wasting so many hours on it.
>
> Thank you so much for the help!
You can make these things easier to debug by breaking your code into small
functions. If there were s
Hey Peter.
This worked like a charm! I can't believe I did not think of that, after
wasting so many hours on it.
Thank you so much for the help!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
giannis.dafnomi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello guys. I'm having an issue with a Python PulP MILP problem. You can
> find the simplified code that reproduces the problem here:
>
> from pulp import *
> machines = 2
> I = range(machines)
> positions = 2
> J = range(positions)
> years = 10
> T = range(y
Hello guys. I'm having an issue with a Python PulP MILP problem. You can find
the simplified code that reproduces the problem here:
from pulp import *
machines = 2
I = range(machines)
positions = 2
J = range(positions)
years = 10
T = range(years)
age = {0: 5, 1: 7}
IR = 0.06
df = 0.3
costs = {
On 07/08/18 08:58, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Request for comments -- proposal to allow custom binary operators.
[snip]
(1) This proposal requires operators to be legal identifiers,
such as "XOR" or "spam", not punctuation like % and
absolutely not Unicode symbols like ∉
Probably wise.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 09:03, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I'll looking for comments on custom binary operators: would it be useful,
> if so, what use-cases do you have?
I've never found a need for custom binary operators.
I can imagine some *theoretical* cases where they might be useful (but
no act
Steven D'Aprano :
> (1) This proposal requires operators to be legal identifiers,
> such as "XOR" or "spam", not punctuation like % and
> absolutely not Unicode symbols like ∉
Oh, that's a let-down. Operator symbols get their expressive value from
visual conciseness:
life←{↑1 ⍵∨.∧3 4
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 00:52, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>
> Chris Warrick wrote:
> > The unusual domain is a common staple of Mailchimp, which is an e-mail
> > newsletter platform (it was used to mail out the announcement), and
> > they replace all links with tracking ones in their list-manage.com
> > d
Request for comments -- proposal to allow custom binary operators.
I'll looking for comments on custom binary operators: would it be useful,
if so, what use-cases do you have?
The most obvious and often-requested use-case would be for a form of
logical operator (AND, OR, XOR) that is distinct f
11 matches
Mail list logo
