On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:53:47 +0530, mahesh d wrote:
> Hii.
>
> I have folder.in that folder some files .txt and some files .msg files.
> .
> My requirement is reading those file contents . Extract data in that
> files .
The answer to this question is the same as the answer to your previous
qu
Hii.
I have folder.in that folder some files .txt and some files .msg files. .
My requirement is reading those file contents . Extract data in that files .
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Matthias Kievernagel writes:
> I changed some detail in the tkinter library,
> so I'm running the tk test like this:
>
> ./python -m test -u gui -v test_tk
>
> Approximately every 2 or 3 runs I get a BadDrawable error
> from the X server, most of the time at the end after
> the last test finished
On 15May2018 07:26, mahesh d wrote:
I have a directory. In that folder .msg files . How can I extract those
files.
You can get the filenames from the directory with the os.listdir function or
with the glob.glob function. If you mean "extract the contents of those files"
instread of just find
Hii
I have a directory. In that folder .msg files . How can I extract those
files.
Thanks & regards
Mahesh
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:20:13 -0500, Python wrote:
> I am hardly perfect.
Have you tried just wanting to be perfect more?
Look, we get it: it is possible to improve the quality of your code by
paying attention to what you do, by proof-reading, testing, code reviews,
warnings, linters, etc. We'
On Mon, 14 May 2018, summerra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having the same issue; can you give an example command line for
python2 and python3 specific installation?
Summerrae,
All my development is now strictly Python3. The installation depends on
your OS and distribution. For a basic installat
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Python wrote:
> I'm well acquainted with that pheonomenon, though I daresay that if
> you proofread your own product you will often find your mistakes. You
> just won't always. But, I never said review it right after you wrote
> it, and in fact I don't do that (w
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Python wrote:
> > Absolutely correct. If you're not doing THOROUGH code reviews, and
> > not thoroughly testing your code, your job is only half done. You
> > should be your own first reviewer, and then
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Five years ago, the President Of the United States of America, or POTUS
> for short, referred to Barrack Obama. Today, it refers to Donald Trump.
> This didn't happen by mutating a single person (an object) from a
> youngish black-skinned man to an oldish orange-skinn
I'm having the same issue; can you give an example command line for python2 and
python3 specific installation?
Thanks!
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 7:12:29 PM UTC-7, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 1:01 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> > Installed here is pylint-1.7.1 and python-3.6.5. When I try t
On 14 May 2018 at 20:02, Paul wrote:
> 1) I understand the added cost of verifying the sequence. However, this
> appears to be a one-time cost. E.G., if I submit this,
>
> random.choices(lm,cum_weights=[25,26,36,46,136],k=400
>
> then the code will do an O(n log n) operation 400 times.
>
> If ve
Hello all!
We are excited to announce a new *major release* of Diffusion Imaging in
Python (DIPY).
*DIPY 0.14 (Tuesday, 1rst May 2018)*
This release received contributions from *24 developers*. A warm thank you
to each one of you for your contribution.
The complete release notes are available a
Ken Kundert writes:
> Lele,
> I am using Python3.6. d has to be an object of mydict.
My bad, sorry, I completely missed the premise :-|.
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
l...@m
Lele,
I am using Python3.6. d has to be an object of mydict.
Here is the code that exhibits the problem:
import sys, os
from inform import error, os_error
class mydict(dict):
def __format__(self, template):
print('Template:', template)
return
On 2018-05-14 20:24, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Ken Kundert writes:
Lele,
I'm afraid I was unclear. The ... in the code snippet was intended
to imply that these lines were appended to the end of the original code,
where d was defined.
Ok, but then I get a different behaviour:
Python 3.6.5
Ken Kundert writes:
> Lele,
> I'm afraid I was unclear. The ... in the code snippet was intended
> to imply that these lines were appended to the end of the original code,
> where d was defined.
Ok, but then I get a different behaviour:
Python 3.6.5 (default, May 11 2018, 13:30:17)
forgot to edit the subject. Sorry.
paul c.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Paul wrote:
> Hello all,
>Thanks for the thoughtful (and non-snarky) replies.
>
> First, a suggestion for a documentation change:
>
> To this paragraph:
>
> *If neither weights nor cum_weights are specified, sele
Hello all,
Thanks for the thoughtful (and non-snarky) replies.
First, a suggestion for a documentation change:
To this paragraph:
*If neither weights nor cum_weights are specified, selections are made with
equal probability. If a weights sequence is supplied, it must be the same
length as the
Lele,
I'm afraid I was unclear. The ... in the code snippet was intended
to imply that these lines were appended to the end of the original code,
where d was defined.
-Ken
On 05/14/2018 12:30 AM, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> Ken Kundert writes:
>
>> I tried adding k and v to the local namespace:
>>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Python wrote:
> Absolutely correct. If you're not doing THOROUGH code reviews, and
> not thoroughly testing your code, your job is only half done. You
> should be your own first reviewer, and then have a second someone
> competent review it after you do.
One sho
Dear list,
I changed some detail in the tkinter library,
so I'm running the tk test like this:
./python -m test -u gui -v test_tk
Approximately every 2 or 3 runs I get a BadDrawable error
from the X server, most of the time at the end after
the last test finished successfully.
As this also happe
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Python wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 02:42:48PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Python wrote:
>> >> Yes, and I'd go further: I *am* too stupid to get this right.
>> >
>> > No, you are not. Do you ever say "dog" when you mean "d
On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:20:06 -0500, Python wrote:
> Preventing *certain classes* of bugs, mainly botching syntax, is mostly
> just a matter of wanting to,
That comment is very ignorant of the mental processes involved in both
language processing and typing, two skills used in programming. You c
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:46:48PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > I expect that these days it will be rare, since most C compilers would
> > default to warning about it if you run with warnings enabled.
>
> That assumes that you regularly run with warnings enabled. While that
> might seem like a
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:05:48AM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 21:42:13 -0500, Python wrote:
>
> > Responding to this further would essentially just require me to
> > reiterate what I already wrote--I won't do that. I'll simply maintain
> > that in my rather lenghty experi
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 02:42:48PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Python wrote:
> >> Yes, and I'd go further: I *am* too stupid to get this right.
> >
> > No, you are not. Do you ever say "dog" when you mean "dot" instead?
> > Do you ever say "dad" when you mean "
On 14 May 2018 at 14:07, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2018 12:59:28 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
>
>> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
>> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
>> populations. Adding a test that the cumulative w
On Mon, 14 May 2018 12:59:28 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
> populations. Adding a test that the cumulative weights are nondecreasing
> would add an O(n) step to th
On 14 May 2018 at 13:53, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On 14 May 2018 at 13:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
O(log n) by
On Mon, 14 May 2018 22:27:24 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
>> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
>> populations. Adding a test that the cumula
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 PM, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 13/05/18 05:31, Python wrote:
>>
>> No, you are not. Do you ever say "dog" when you mean "dot" instead?
>> Do you ever say "dad" when you mean "mom" instead?
>
>
> One of my aunts used to muddle family names all the time. She once called
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 14 May 2018 at 13:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
>>> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on larg
On Sun, 13 May 2018, Terry Reedy wrote:
You have to install a package in /site-packages for each version you want
to run it with.
Terry,
It is installed in the site-packages/ directory for both 2.7 and 3.6.
Then you have to make sure you run the version you intend to run.
Since both /
On 13/05/18 05:31, Python wrote:
No, you are not. Do you ever say "dog" when you mean "dot" instead?
Do you ever say "dad" when you mean "mom" instead?
One of my aunts used to muddle family names all the time. She once
called me by my sister's name; one would have thought the beard was a
cl
On 14 May 2018 at 13:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
>> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
>> populations. Adding a test that the cumulative weight
On 2018-05-14 07:05, zljubi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have dataframe with CRM_assetID column as category dtype:
>
> df.info()
>
>
> RangeIndex: 1435952 entries, 0 to 1435951
> Data columns (total 75 columns):
> startTime1435952 non-null object
> CRM_assetID
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
> O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
> populations. Adding a test that the cumulative weights are
> nondecreasing would add an O(n) step to the c
On Monday, 14 May 2018 13:05:24 UTC+2, zlju...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have dataframe with CRM_assetID column as category dtype:
>
> df.info()
>
>
> RangeIndex: 1435952 entries, 0 to 1435951
> Data columns (total 75 columns):
> startTime1435952 non-null object
Hi,
I have dataframe with CRM_assetID column as category dtype:
df.info()
RangeIndex: 1435952 entries, 0 to 1435951
Data columns (total 75 columns):
startTime1435952 non-null object
CRM_assetID 1435952 non-null category
searching a dataframe
On Sun, 13 May 2018 13:02:01 -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
[...]
> It appears to me as if an object's type is totally mutable and solely
> dependant on assignment.
>
obj = 'a1b2'
type (obj)
>
obj = list(obj)
type (obj)
>
> At what level does my understanding break down?
The problem is that supplying cum_weights allows the code to run in
O(log n) by using bisection. This is significantly faster on large
populations. Adding a test that the cumulative weights are
nondecreasing would add an O(n) step to the code.
So while I understand the OP's problem, I don't think
Hi Paul, and welcome!
On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:48:47 -0700, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
> I just learned how to use random.choices().
[...]
> Consequently, I specified 'cum_weights' with a sequence which wasn't in
> ascending order. I got back k results but I determined that they
> weren't correct (eg,
On 2018-05-14 04:08, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 3:22 PM, Ken Kundert wrote:
>
> Please do not double post.
>
>> I am seeing an unexpected difference between the behavior of the string
>> format method and f-strings.
>
> Read
> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#form
Ken Kundert writes:
> I tried adding k and v to the local namespace:
>
> ...
> k = 6
> v = 9
> print(f'Email: {d:{{k}} {{v}}}')
>
> I still got:
>
> NameError: name 'k' is not defined
This is not what I get:
Python 3.6.5 (default, May 11 2018, 13:30:17)
[GCC 7.3.0]
45 matches
Mail list logo
