On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:52:33 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Perhaps:
>
> import lzma
> lzc = lzma.LZMACompressor()
Ah, thanks for the suggestion!
--
Steve
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:30:57 -0800, codewizard wrote:
> Regardless of what the policies are and how well they're enforced, if
> the mailing list is cut off from GG, I will stop reading it.
There is *absolutely nothing* we can do about that. Google doesn't listen
to us, and the suggestion that we
Perhaps:
import lzma
lzc = lzma.LZMACompressor()
out1 = lzc.compress(b"Some data\n")
out2 = lzc.compress(b"Another piece of data\n")
out3 = lzc.compress(b"Even more data\n")
out4 = lzc.flush()
# Concatenate all the partial results:
result = b"".join([out1, out2, out3, out4])
?
lzma compresses ha
I want to compress a sequence of bytes one byte at a time. (I am already
processing the bytes one byte at a time, for other reasons.) I don't
particularly care *which* compression method is used, and in fact I'm not
even interested in the compressed data itself, only its length. So I'm
looking
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 6:45:18 PM UTC-5, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 2/9/18 6:19 PM, codew...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 5:03:45 PM UTC-5, Richard Damon wrote:
> >> On 2/9/18 4:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
> On Frid
On 2/9/18 6:19 PM, codewiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 5:03:45 PM UTC-5, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/9/18 4:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 2:48:17 PM UTC-5, Chris Green wrote:
codew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 5:03:45 PM UTC-5, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 2/9/18 4:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 2:48:17 PM UTC-5, Chris Green wrote:
> >>> codew...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 3, 201
On 2/9/18 4:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 2:48:17 PM UTC-5, Chris Green wrote:
codew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 7:15:16 PM UTC-5, pyotr filipivich wrote:
[snip]
Those of us who do not us
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 2:48:17 PM UTC-5, Chris Green wrote:
>> codew...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 7:15:16 PM UTC-5, pyotr filipivich wrote:
>> > > [snip]
>> > > Those of us who do not use google-groups may not
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 2:48:17 PM UTC-5, Chris Green wrote:
> codew...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 7:15:16 PM UTC-5, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > Those of us who do not use google-groups may not notice the loss
> > > of the google groupies.
>
codewiz...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 7:15:16 PM UTC-5, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Those of us who do not use google-groups may not notice the loss
> > of the google groupies.
>
> I use GG to read comp.lang.python because of the following combination
>
On 09/02/18 18:35, Stanley Denman wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 1:08:27 AM UTC-6, dieter wrote:
Stanley Denman writes:
I am new to Python. I am trying to extract text from the bookmarks in a PDF
file that would provide the data for a Word template merge. I have gotten down
to a stri
On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 7:15:16 PM UTC-5, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> [snip]
> Those of us who do not use google-groups may not notice the loss
> of the google groupies.
I use GG to read comp.lang.python because of the following combination
of factors. I would definitely be happier
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 12:20:29 AM UTC-6, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 6:04:48 PM UTC+13, Stanley Denman wrote:
> > {'/Title': '1F: Progress Notes Src.: MILANI, JOHN C Tmt. Dt.:
> > 05/12/2014 - 05/28/2014 (9 pages)', '/Page': IndirectObject(465, 0),
> >
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 1:08:27 AM UTC-6, dieter wrote:
> Stanley Denman writes:
>
> > I am new to Python. I am trying to extract text from the bookmarks in a PDF
> > file that would provide the data for a Word template merge. I have gotten
> > down to a string of text pulled out of the
On 09/02/2018 15:37, Chris Green wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:45:29 +, Chris Green wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
[...]
Please don't waste your time with the gmane website. Just point any
(semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've
Su
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:45:29 +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > Mark Lawrence wrote:
> [...]
> >> Please don't waste your time with the gmane website. Just point any
> >> (semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've
> >
> > Surely you mean NNTP/
On 02/09/2018 08:07 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:45:29 +, Chris Green wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
[...]
Please don't waste your time with the gmane website. Just point any
(semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've
Surely you mean NNTP
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:45:29 +, Chris Green wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
[...]
>> Please don't waste your time with the gmane website. Just point any
>> (semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've
>
> Surely you mean NNTP/Usenet client.
That's what he said :-)
Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 09/02/18 11:23, John Ladasky wrote:
> >
> > I haven't visited GMane in a few years, but I found it difficult to
> > navigate.
> In particular, I found searching to be cumbersome. Weren't the archives
> broken into 30-day blocks?
> >
> > I just tried GMane again two
On 02/09/2018 12:23 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 12:50:16 AM UTC-8, Tim Golden wrote:
Gmane offers a newsgroup interface to the mailing list
I haven't visited GMane in a few years, but I found it difficult to navigate.
In particular, I found searching to be cumberso
On 09/02/18 11:23, John Ladasky wrote:
I haven't visited GMane in a few years, but I found it difficult to navigate.
In particular, I found searching to be cumbersome. Weren't the archives broken
into 30-day blocks?
I just tried GMane again two minutes ago. I can't confirm my recollections
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 12:50:16 AM UTC-8, Tim Golden wrote:
[snip and rearrange]
> So dropping GG altogether would probably not add very much, as we're
> generally blocking undesirable posts from there and we'd rather not
> block genuine posts which happen to be made through the relativ
On 09/02/2018 05:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 23:40:57 +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I don't see any spam in my inbox as I read on gmane, I'm pointing out
the disgraceful state of gg and why it should be dropped as it's less
than useless.
Who is it that you think should "drop"
24 matches
Mail list logo
