On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:39 am, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 5 November 2017 at 01:22, Steve D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 04:32 am, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to dump a Firefox IndexDB sqlite file to text using Python 3.5.
>>>
>>>
>>> import sqlite3
>>> con = sqlite3.connect('foo.s
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 03:57 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 09:06 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2017 07:09 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 06:15 am, Michael Torrie wrote:
> In fact if you have no b
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 01:39 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-11-05, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 04:44 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>> That conforms to my model. It's searching for the condition
>>> 'count > MAX_OBJECTS'.
>>
>> That's sounds to me that you are willing to call just about an
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:06 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>
>> On 2017-11-05, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> Jon Ribbens writes:
I've provided you with a way of thinking about 'for...else' that makes
its purpose and meaning intuitively obvious.
>>>
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:06 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-11-05, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Jon Ribbens writes:
>>> I've provided you with a way of thinking about 'for...else' that makes
>>> its purpose and meaning intuitively obvious.
>>
>> I've read that sentence several times, and I still can't mak
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2017-11-05, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Jon Ribbens writes:
> >> I've provided you with a way of thinking about 'for...else' that makes
> >> its purpose and meaning intuitively obvious.
> >
> > I've read that sentence several times, and I still can't make it
> > anything but
On 2017-11-05, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jon Ribbens writes:
>> I've provided you with a way of thinking about 'for...else' that makes
>> its purpose and meaning intuitively obvious.
>
> I've read that sentence several times, and I still can't make it
> anything but a contradiction in terms.
Well, kee
Jon Ribbens writes:
> I've provided you with a way of thinking about 'for...else' that makes
> its purpose and meaning intuitively obvious.
I've read that sentence several times, and I still can't make it
anything but a contradiction in terms.
Something that is “intuitively obvious” surely has
On 11/5/2017 4:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 05Nov2017 13:09, Στέφανος Σωφρονίου
wrote:
Folks,
More and more nonsense are coming in and I find it really difficult to
follow any new post that may come and I have to either search for
specific content or scroll down until I hit it by accident
On 05Nov2017 13:09, Στέφανος Σωφρονίου wrote:
Folks,
More and more nonsense are coming in and I find it really difficult to follow
any new post that may come and I have to either search for specific content or
scroll down until I hit it by accident.
Can we do something about it?
It's getting
Folks,
More and more nonsense are coming in and I find it really difficult to follow
any new post that may come and I have to either search for specific content or
scroll down until I hit it by accident.
Can we do something about it?
It's getting really frustrating :/
Cheers.
--
https://mai
On 5 November 2017 at 13:54, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Paul Moore writes:
>>But regardless, the Zen isn't intended to be taken quite as literally
>>as the OP was trying to do. It's a statement of principles, not a set
>>of rules.
>
> What I am looking for is a default notation to use in my
> beginn
On 2017-11-05, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 04:44 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> That conforms to my model. It's searching for the condition
>> 'count > MAX_OBJECTS'.
>
> That's sounds to me that you are willing to call just about any test of a
> condition inside a loop a "search". I don'
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:54 am, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Paul Moore writes:
>>But regardless, the Zen isn't intended to be taken quite as literally
>>as the OP was trying to do. It's a statement of principles, not a set
>>of rules.
>
> What I am looking for is a default notation to use in my
> begin
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 09:53 pm, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 11:28:44AM +1100, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> > Try in an interactive interpreter:
>> >
>> >python> "a string" is True
>>
>> Did you try that yourself?
>
> Yes, eventually, which is why I corrected myself publicly
On 5 November 2017 at 01:22, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 04:32 am, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to dump a Firefox IndexDB sqlite file to text using Python 3.5.
>>
>>
>> import sqlite3
>> con = sqlite3.connect('foo.sqlite')
>> with open('dump.sql', 'w') as f:
>> for line
On 5 November 2017 at 01:19, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 06:42 am, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
>> What is the one way to do it?
>
> There is no philosophy of "one way to do it" in Python, that is a
> misunderstanding (possibly deliberate...) spread about by Perl users, to
> contrast Python
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 11:28:44AM +1100, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> > Try in an interactive interpreter:
> >
> >python> "a string" is True
>
> Did you try that yourself?
Yes, eventually, which is why I corrected myself publicly.
However, while it doesn't return True (as I mistakenly
suggeste
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 12:49 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano writes:
>
>> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 06:42 am, Stefan Ram wrote:
>>
>> > What is the one way to do it?
>>
>> There is no philosophy of "one way to do it" in Python, that is a
>> misunderstanding (possibly deliberate...) spread about by P
19 matches
Mail list logo
