Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Ian wrote:
> >> "Larry Martell" wrote:
> >> 9:21 PM Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > > Statement 1: Aeroplanes fly. Statement 2: Submarines swim.
> > > > Are these two statements equally acceptable? [Inspired
> > > > by a talk by Noam Chomsky]
> > > There sh
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 5:05:41 PM UTC-4, Test Banks wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> You can get Test Bank for " Essentials of Sociology 6th Edition by Richard P.
> Appelbaum, Deborah Carr, Mitchell Duneier, Anthony Giddens " at very
> reasonable price. Our team is available 24/7 and 365 days /
On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Jon Ribbens
> wrote:
>> I said it in the majority of the posts I've made in this thread.
>> I said it in the post you were responding to just now. I'm using
>> threads. Now I've said it again.
>
> You said WHY you are using
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Jon Ribbens
>> wrote:
>>> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jon Ribbens
wrote:
> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wro
On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Jon Ribbens
> wrote:
>> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jon Ribbens
>>> wrote:
On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>>On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:25 am, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>With that in mind, "an Integral" is a shorthand for "an Integral value",
>
> In math, an integral value is called an /integer/.
> Therefore, in math, it would seem strange to avoid the noun
>
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jon Ribbens
>> wrote:
>>> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process is now terminated".
That's what happened wh
On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jon Ribbens
> wrote:
>> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process is now terminated".
>>> That's what happened when I pressed Ctrl-C (the IP address was
>>> deliberately pic
On 21/08/2017 15:34, Hamish MacDonald wrote:
I wanted to give a shout out to the wonderfully passionate contributions to
python I've witnessed following this and other mailing lists over the
last little bit.
The level of knowledge and willingness to help I've seen are truly
inspiring. Super mo
On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 11:23:26 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
> On 2017-08-25 15:40, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Rustom Mody declaimed the
> > following:
> >
> >
> >>This was true of Britain 100 years ago
> >>It was true of Rome 1000 years ago
> >
>
On 2017-08-25 15:40, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Rustom Mody
declaimed the following:
This was true of Britain 100 years ago
It was true of Rome 1000 years ago
Rome was still a problem in 1017? That's only 50 years away from the
Battle of Hasti
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process is now terminated".
>> That's what happened when I pressed Ctrl-C (the IP address was
>> deliberately picked as one that doesn't currently exist on my n
On 2017-08-25, dieter wrote:
> This may no longer work. Long ago, I have often been plagued
> by such EINTR exceptions, and I have wished heavily that in those
> cases the IO operation should be automatically resumed. In recent time,
> I have no longer seen such exceptions - and I concluded that m
On 2017-08-25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process is now terminated".
> That's what happened when I pressed Ctrl-C (the IP address was
> deliberately picked as one that doesn't currently exist on my network,
> so it took time).
Ok yes, so ctrl-C is sending
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2017 23:21:22 Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> I think Chomsky is a jerk, and I'm angry at media outlets like CNN
>> giving him a forum to spew his idiocies.
>
> I agree Larry, Chomsky can be described in even more flowery term
On Friday, 25 August 2017 14:16:05 UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yep. We're in agreement on that. My only point about the confusion was
> the way in which you could get "wrong answers" in binary but "right
> answers" in decimal, leading to the "0.1 + 0.2 != 0.3" problem. That's
> a sum that works
On 08/25/2017 06:10 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Do I miss any means to make the turtle graphics window
> behave more normally and at the same time be able to draw
> graphics interactivley from the console, watching the result
> of one move command and then interacticely typing in more
> move
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> How did we get onto prime factors of denominators? The point I was making is
> that there are plenty of fractions which are not multiples of 1/5 which
> nevertheless lead to unintuitive "wrong answers" in both Decimal and binary
> floating
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 04:12 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> And there are numbers which repeat in decimal but not binary, and numbers
>> which repeat in both, and numbers which don't repeat in either.
>
> Which ones repeat in decimal but not binary? An example, please.
What? No. I never said that, th
On 8/25/17 12:10 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano writes:
>> Did __next__ cache the most recently generated value?
> No but if they're going to change stuff, they might as well actually
> improve it instead of just renaming it to break code gratutiously.
The vast majority of iteration has n
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>>> And there are numbers which repeat in decimal but not binary,
>> Which ones repeat in decimal but not binary? An example, please.
>
> That should really have said binary but not decimal, since 2 divides 10.
Well, tho
Chris Angelico writes:
> ...
> That looks like an exception to me. Not a "process is now terminated".
> That's what happened when I pressed Ctrl-C (the IP address was
> deliberately picked as one that doesn't currently exist on my network,
> so it took time).
What Jon argues about: signals are de
22 matches
Mail list logo
