On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 2:47:26 PM UTC+8, Ho Yeung Lee wrote:
> On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 2:40:49 PM UTC+8, top...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Did you call freeze_support() function after script start?
> > https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.freeze_support
>
>
Ho Yeung Lee wrote:
> i use window subsystem ubuntu
> and install python 3 and tensorflow
>
> then when try deep learning
>
> https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/wide_and_deep
>
> got error when urlretrieve local directory in ubuntu in window
>
> tried urllib3 still have error
>
> import tem
On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 2:40:49 PM UTC+8, top...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Did you call freeze_support() function after script start?
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.freeze_support
no, i did not call freeze_support()
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Did you call freeze_support() function after script start?
https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.freeze_support
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i use window subsystem ubuntu
and install python 3 and tensorflow
then when try deep learning
https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/wide_and_deep
got error when urlretrieve local directory in ubuntu in window
tried urllib3 still have error
import tempfile
import pandas as pd
import urllib as u
i mean executable file can not run the multiprocessing thread
after convert to executable file with py2exe
On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 2:09:04 PM UTC+8, Ho Yeung Lee wrote:
> p = multiprocessing.Process(target=helloconnect, args=(host,"",))
>
> multiprocessing.Process can not start a thread in
p = multiprocessing.Process(target=helloconnect, args=(host,"",))
multiprocessing.Process can not start a thread in py2exe
it can compile and run without error
but it can not run function helloconnect
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Gregory Ewing
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> But since Python _does_ work with dynamic evaluation
>> (which consequently demands that these kinds of things be expressions
>> evaluated at compile time), it must by definition be possible to have
>> side effects
Chris Angelico wrote:
But since Python _does_ work with dynamic evaluation
(which consequently demands that these kinds of things be expressions
evaluated at compile time), it must by definition be possible to have
side effects.
In most languages, type declarations are not expressions
and aren'
On 05/20/2017 03:56 PM, bartc wrote:
> BTW /does/ Linux compile on /any/ modern compiler? I heard it was so
> difficult to compile that gcc had to be specially modified to make it
> possible.
The kernel compiles with recent bog standard gcc compilers just fine.
The last time there was an issue w
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:56 PM, bartc wrote:
> I would say there are two types of people: those who care about the answer,
> and those who don't.
I say there are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand
binary and those who don’t.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On 20/05/2017 19:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:11 AM, bartc wrote:
(Which is exactly what I strive to do. Although my projects are small, they
could still involve dozens of source and support files, and require running
non-standard tools to build, which would then requir
On Sun, 21 May 2017 04:11 am, bartc wrote:
> You've reduced
> the job of building a set of kitchen units to hammering in just one
> nail
"Where's the fridge go?"
"You don't need a fridge. Just put things outside, in the snow. When it
snows."
"Okay, how do I install a gas oven?"
"Sorry, you can
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:11 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 20/05/2017 17:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Viktor Hagström
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have followed this discussion since the beginning, and I have been
>>> intrigued. I recently read a relevant blog post that I'd lik
On 20/05/2017 17:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Viktor Hagström
wrote:
I have followed this discussion since the beginning, and I have been intrigued.
I recently read a relevant blog post that I'd like to share. It has arguments
for both sides: http://nullprogram.c
On 5/20/2017 1:19 AM, dieter wrote:
If your (590) pages are linked together (such that you must fetch
a page to get the following one) and page fetching is the limiting
factor, then this would limit the parallelizability.
The pages are not linked together. The URL requires a page number. If I
On Sun, 21 May 2017 12:14 am, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> You mean treat them as syntactically comments?
>>
>> def function(arg:I can put ***ANYTHING*** I like here!!!):
>
> They could be parsed as expressions and stored as an AST.
> That would allow introspection, and you co
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Viktor Hagström
wrote:
> I have followed this discussion since the beginning, and I have been
> intrigued. I recently read a relevant blog post that I'd like to share. It
> has arguments for both sides: http://nullprogram.com/blog/2017/03/30/.
>
"""
There’s a mu
سكس اسرائيلى موقع سميرة الشرموطة موقع الشرموطة سميرة موقع ميلتا للجنس العربي
موقع مليتا للسكس العربي موقع مليتا موقع 89
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
سكس اسرائيلى موقع سميرة الشرموطة موقع الشرموطة سميرة موقع ميلتا للجنس العربي
موقع مليتا للسكس العربي موقع مليتا موقع 89
سكس منيوكه مرفت جنس منيوكة مصرية منديات عرب لبنان سكس منتديات فلام إغتصاب
منتديات سكسية منتديات سكس منتديات شرموطة منتديات رومنسي السكسية منت
https://mslslat2017.blogspot
I have more than 100 ligand molecules. The image I showed at the beginning of
this discussion was only an example. It had missing atoms.
See it without missing any atom in the pdb format (coordinates in Angstrom
unit):
ATOM 1 O1 LIG 1 46.050 50.290 26.860
ATOM
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:41:02 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 05:15 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> > Oh but this is Bart we're talking about. Of course his code generator is
> > perfect, it is unthinkable that it emits incorrect code.
>
> I think we've picked on Bart enough for o
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 8:32:18 PM UTC+1, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2017 18:11, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > Seems a bit hypocritical, don't you think? Expecting people to go spelunking
> > into your undocumented mystery language source code to work out how to
> > build it from source, and then
I have followed this discussion since the beginning, and I have been intrigued.
I recently read a relevant blog post that I'd like to share. It has arguments
for both sides: http://nullprogram.com/blog/2017/03/30/.
2017-05-20 0:01 GMT+02:00 eryk sun
mailto:eryk...@gmail.com>>:
On Fri, May 19, 2
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Gregory Ewing
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> They're function metadata. What would the principle of least surprise
>> say about this?
>>
>> print("Spam")
>> def func(arg: print("Foo") = print("Quux")):
>> print("Blargh")
>> print("Fred")
>> func()
>> pri
On 20/05/2017 14:49, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 20 May 2017 09:13 pm, bartc wrote:
Try running the program.
(I did that but I can't follow this style of coding so can't help.)
Chris is within his rights to refuse to run untrusted code downloaded over
the internet.
It's not even the secu
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
You mean treat them as syntactically comments?
def function(arg:I can put ***ANYTHING*** I like here!!!):
They could be parsed as expressions and stored as an AST.
That would allow introspection, and you could evaluate them
if you wanted
Ever since they were introduced,
Dear subscribers,
We are pleased to announce the release of aioxmpp 0.9. The current release can
be obtained from GitHub [1] (check out the v0.9.0 tag or the master branch) or
PyPI [2]. The HTML documentation can be found at [3]. Examples can be found in
the GitHub repository, in the examples s
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2017 09:13 pm, bartc wrote:
>
>> On 20/05/2017 03:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Without any specific questions, you're not going to get anything more
>>> than a basic eyeballing of the code.
>>
>> Try running the program.
>>
>
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:42 am, gars...@gmail.com wrote:
> m using Python 3.4.2
> This is my code:
Please read this first:
http://sscce.org/
And then indent the "calc" method so that it is part of the class:
> def calc(self, display):
> try:
> display.set(eval(display.get()))
> e
Chris Angelico wrote:
They're function metadata. What would the principle of least surprise
say about this?
print("Spam")
def func(arg: print("Foo") = print("Quux")):
print("Blargh")
print("Fred")
func()
print("Eggs")
Most languages that have static type declarations wouldn't
let you write
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
Or /sbin or /usr/sbin or /opt :-)
Yes, there are a few others. The point is that there is a small
number of standard places for executables, and if you have them
on your path, you're good to go.
With Visual Studio it seems things get installed somewhere
that's not on you
On Sat, 20 May 2017 09:13 pm, bartc wrote:
> On 20/05/2017 03:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Without any specific questions, you're not going to get anything more
>> than a basic eyeballing of the code.
>
> Try running the program.
>
> (I did that but I can't follow this style of coding so can't h
>
> I have a problem to finding file in Python path,Anybody knows how to solve
> it?
>
> Unexpected error:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/nurzat/Documents/vmtk-build/Install/bin/vmtklevelsetsegmentation",
> line 20, in
> from vmtk import pypeserver
> File "/usr/loca
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:13 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 20/05/2017 03:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> def calc(self, display):
>>> try:
>>> display.set(eval(display.get()))
>>> except:
>>> display.set("Type an actual equation pl
On 20/05/2017 03:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote:
def calc(self, display):
try:
display.set(eval(display.get()))
except:
display.set("Type an actual equation please!")
Without any specific questions, you're not going to get anything m
Christopher Reimer writes:
> I'm developing a web scraper script. It takes 25 minutes to process
> 590 pages and ~9,000 comments. I've been told that the script is
> taking too long.
>
> The way the script currently works is that the page requester is a
> generator function that requests a page, c
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:57 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> They're function metadata. What would the principle of least surprise
> say about this?
>
> print("Spam")
> def func(arg: print("Foo") = print("Quux")):
> print("Blargh")
> print("Fred")
> func()
> print("Eggs")
>
> What should be printed
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:42 am, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:35 pm, Edward Ned Harvey (python) wrote:
>>
>>> I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
>>> doesn't...
>>
>> Why would you think that?
>
> Ever since Guido retconned the
39 matches
Mail list logo
