On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 4:17:23 PM UTC-7, qasi...@gmail.com wrote:
> The center of mass of the whole ligand that I calculated is the center of
> geometry (the average/mean atomic positions) from the sample input file
> provided. I don't take other things into account, such as knowledge of the
On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:43 am, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> bartc wrote:
[...]
>> By programmer-hostile do you mean Windows?
>
> Yes. At least it seems that way to people who are used to developing
> on unix systems. For example, your problems with not being able to
> run programs from the command line
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (python)
wrote:
> I think it's great that for built-in types such as int and str, backward
> compatibility of type hinting annotations is baked into python 3.0 to 3.4. In
> fact, I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
makes sense that the RHS of the equality (deafult value) should be
evaluated before the LHS (arg name + type) but if you hadn't pointed out
that something was not as you expected, i would not have paid attention and
anticipated as you did. Then again RHS vs LHS might have nothing to do with
the rea
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote:
> def calc(self, display):
> try:
> display.set(eval(display.get()))
> except:
> display.set("Type an actual equation please!")
Without any specific questions, you're not going to get anything more
than a basic eyeballing of the co
On 2017-05-20 02:42, gars...@gmail.com wrote:
m using Python 3.4.2
This is my code:
from tkinter import*
def iCalc(source, side):
storeObj= Frame(source, borderwidth= 1, bd= 4, bg="powder blue")
storeObj.pack(side=side, expand=YES, fill=BOTH)
return storeObj
def button (source,
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Gregory Ewing
wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:35 pm, Edward Ned Harvey (python) wrote:
>>
>>> I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
>>> doesn't...
>>
>>
>> Why would you think that?
>
>
> Ever since Guido retc
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:35 pm, Edward Ned Harvey (python) wrote:
I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
doesn't...
Why would you think that?
Ever since Guido retconned the purpose of annotations to be
for static type hinting *only*, it would ma
m using Python 3.4.2
This is my code:
from tkinter import*
def iCalc(source, side):
storeObj= Frame(source, borderwidth= 1, bd= 4, bg="powder blue")
storeObj.pack(side=side, expand=YES, fill=BOTH)
return storeObj
def button (source, side, text, command=None):
storeObj= B
Im using Python 3.4.2
This is my code:
from tkinter import*
def iCalc(source, side):
storeObj= Frame(source, borderwidth= 1, bd= 4, bg="powder blue")
storeObj.pack(side=side, expand=YES, fill=BOTH)
return storeObj
def button (source, side, text, command=None):
storeObj= Button(s
bartc wrote:
If I delete the .a file and do make again, then it will give me a list
of object files comprising libpython3.6m.a (not sure why it needs to be
a library, rather than bundle the list of .o files with python.o).
Most of the interpreter is built as a library so that other
programs ca
bartc wrote:
Compiling a C file should be nothing at all. Especially of a known,
working program.
Writing reasonably portable C is feasible, as long as you don't
use any platform-specific system calls or libraries, don't do any
low-level bit twiddling that depends on data sizes and endianness,
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
The build process on Windows is relatively neglected
compared to Linux (but not as much as on OS X)
If it's neglected on OSX, it's doing pretty well despite that!
I built Python 3.5.1 on my 10.6 system not long ago, and it
worked flawlessly.
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python
bartc wrote:
Actually, I remember struggling to get even tcc installed! I think I had
to compile from source, using configure and make (and that worked, this
being Linux). But didn't know how to set it up to work from anywhere. So
CC=tcc might not work.
If it comes with a standard gnu config
On 05/19/2017 03:38 PM, bartc wrote:
> If I delete the .a file and do make again, then it will give me a list
> of object files comprising libpython3.6m.a (not sure why it needs to be
> a library, rather than bundle the list of .o files with python.o).
The reason is that the core of CPython is a
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:29 AM, bartc wrote:
>> I disagree entirely. For a person who claims to have 40 years
>>programming experience I say he's completely clueless. Until such time
>> as he can show that he understands source code control, the
>> difficulties in building cross platform code a
On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:35 pm, Edward Ned Harvey (python) wrote:
> I think it's great that for built-in types such as int and str, backward
> compatibility of type hinting annotations is baked into python 3.0 to 3.4.
> In fact, I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
> does
On 19/05/2017 23:22, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:41:02 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 05/18/2017 05:15 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
Oh but this is Bart we're talking about. Of course his code generator is
perfect, it is unthinkable that it emits incorrect code.
The center of mass of the whole ligand that I calculated is the center of
geometry (the average/mean atomic positions) from the sample input file
provided. I don't take other things into account, such as knowledge of the mass
of each atom and so on. The difference between the center of mass and
On 5/19/2017 10:27 AM, Havalda Andrew wrote:
I have encountered a problem with Python 3.6 version, when I open IDLE
How did you start IDLE?
it says: "Subprocess startup error".
There are over 5 possible reasons for this.
> I am using Windows 10
That is helpful to know. How did you insta
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:18 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 19/05/2017 19:53, eryk sun wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:57 PM, bartc wrote:
>
>
>>> The 'improvement' seems to involve making things more complicated rather
>>> than less.
>
>
>> You don't need a full Visual Studio 2015 installation. Yo
On 19/05/2017 12:00, bartc wrote:
These are the binary files on my Python 3.4 system:
python.exe
pythonw.exe
DLLs/pyexpat.pyd
DLLs/python3.dll
...
So, which sources are needed to compile and link python.exe for example?
Which headers or other files need to be synthesised for them [to] be
co
On 19/05/2017 19:53, eryk sun wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:57 PM, bartc wrote:
The 'improvement' seems to involve making things more complicated rather
than less.
You don't need a full Visual Studio 2015 installation. You can install
Visual C++ 2015 Build Tools [1], which includes MSBu
Havalda Andrew wrote:
[Please answer to the list rather than in private mail. Thank you.]
> Yes, the message is exactly like that. I can't really use the command
> line, so could you please tell me how should I start it from there with
> the -n option?
I'm sorry I cannot give you any details as
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>
> In fact Python 3.6 ships with the latest version of the MSVCRT universal
> runtime.
Windows Python 3.6 is distributed with vcruntime140.dll, which is a
relatively small component of the CRT that's closely coupled to the
compiler. The Un
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:57 PM, bartc wrote:
>> Yes, we acknowledge that there's much improvement needed to building
>> Python, especially on Windows.
>
> The 'improvement' seems to involve making things more complicated rather
> than less.
>
> (So I need VS2015, .NET, GIT, SVN and MSBUILD. Or ma
We are pleased to announce our next keynote speaker for
EuroPython 2017:
* Katharine Jarmul *
About Katharine Jarmul
Katharine Jarmul is a pythonista and founder of Kjamistan,
a data consulting company in Berlin, Germany.
She’s been using P
On Friday 19 May 2017 10:21:26 Peter Otten wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 19 May 2017 09:32:00 Ethan Furman wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2017 04:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > I have a need for the subjects function but installed on wheezy.
> >> > But it is not in the repo's.
> >> >
> >> >
Havalda Andrew wrote:
> Dear Python team,
>
> I have encountered a problem with Python 3.6 version, when I open IDLE it
> sais: "Subprocess startup error". I attached a photo of it.
This is a text-only list, so we will not be able to see any pictures.
> And after I
> click "Ok" it closes. I ca
This pattern seems to work:
import sys
if sys.version_info[0] < 3:
raise RuntimeError("Must use at least python version 3")
# The 'typing' module, useful for type hints, was introduced in python 3.5
if sys.version_info[1] >= 5:
from typing import Optional
optional_float = Optional[fl
Edward Ned Harvey (python) wrote:
> I think it's great that for built-in types such as int and str, backward
> compatibility of type hinting annotations is baked into python 3.0 to 3.4.
> In fact, I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
> doesn't...
>
> I'm struggling to
Dear Python team,
I have encountered a problem with Python 3.6 version, when I open IDLE it
sais: "Subprocess startup error". I attached a photo of it. And after I
click "Ok" it closes. I can not even use IDEs either. (I can not run a
single print statement...)
I am using Windows 10 on a Dell la
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 19 May 2017 09:32:00 Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/2017 04:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > I have a need for the subjects function but installed on wheezy.
>> > But it is not in the repo's.
>> >
>> > Is there a solution that doesn't break wheezy?
>>
>> It's a p
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Havalda Andrew
Sent: 2017. május 18., csütörtök 19:56
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Python win 10 problem
Dear Python team,
I have encountered a problem with Python 3.6 version, when I open IDLE it sais:
"Subprocess startup error". I attached a photo
On Friday 19 May 2017 09:32:00 Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 05/19/2017 04:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I have a need for the subjects function but installed on wheezy.
> > But it is not in the repo's.
> >
> > Is there a solution that doesn't break wheezy?
>
> It's a pure Python module, so should wo
On 19/05/2017 12:41, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:36 pm, bartc wrote:
Which gcc version? I can't get mine (5.1.0) to report any of these, even
with -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic.
[steve@ando langs]$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-55)
Interesting; an older
I think it's great that for built-in types such as int and str, backward
compatibility of type hinting annotations is baked into python 3.0 to 3.4. In
fact, I *thought* python 3.0 to 3.4 would *ignore* annotations, but it
doesn't...
I'm struggling to create something backward compatible that re
On 05/19/2017 04:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I have a need for the subjects function but installed on wheezy. But it
is not in the repo's.
Is there a solution that doesn't break wheezy?
It's a pure Python module, so should work fine. But I would recommend
aenum instead as I only update enum
Greetings,
I'm developing a web scraper script. It takes 25 minutes to process 590
pages and ~9,000 comments. I've been told that the script is taking too
long.
The way the script currently works is that the page requester is a
generator function that requests a page, checks if the page cont
Greetings all;
I have a need for the subjects function but installed on wheezy. But it
is not in the repo's.
Is there a solution that doesn't break wheezy?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in tha
Hello everyone,
I have a problem to finding file in Python path,Anybody knows how to solve it?
Unexpected error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/nurzat/Documents/vmtk-build/Install/bin/vmtklevelsetsegmentation", line
20, in
from vmtk import pypeserver
File
"/usr/loca
On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:36 pm, bartc wrote:
> Which gcc version? I can't get mine (5.1.0) to report any of these, even
> with -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic.
[steve@ando langs]$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-55)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free soft
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:00 PM, bartc wrote:
> Just to get the ball rolling, they don't need to be perfect. Building
> python.exe would be a useful first step, even if it fails to run for many
> other reasons.
Actually, it's more useful if it completely fails to build. As I was
porting one parti
On 19/05/2017 08:56, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Bart, I think the original experiment you were trying to do
(compiling Python with tcc) would be much more easily performed
on Linux than Windows. Have you considered trying that?
Yes, the last time I tried to compile CPython, I had to do it on Linux.
On 19/05/2017 04:31, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2017 04:17 am, bartc wrote:
There is one uninitialised variable reported. And that is used only in
an error situation. But yes, that was a mistake.
"Only one"?
Its a bit naughty to claim "one" uninitialized variable when there
On 5/19/2017 2:33 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Caveat Emptor: I haven't run this build bat on Windows myself. I am a
bit astonished it depends on svn. Which software packages does it
download via svn?
At least some of the dependencies. You can check the external.bat
invoked by the -e opt
On 19/05/2017 10:06, BlindAnagram wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I woke up this morning realising that my published code for this
> tantaliser is not very good.
>
> I would hence be most grateful if you could substitute the attached version.
>
>best regards,
>
> Brian
Apologies - posted in err
Hi Jim,
I woke up this morning realising that my published code for this
tantaliser is not very good.
I would hence be most grateful if you could substitute the attached version.
best regards,
Brian
from itertools import combinations, permutations, product
# enumerate the names
A, B,
Bart, I think the original experiment you were trying to do
(compiling Python with tcc) would be much more easily performed
on Linux than Windows. Have you considered trying that?
Configure and compile it for Linux using gcc first, then
set CC=tcc and try to compile it again. If you're lucky,
you
qasimp...@gmail.com wrote:
"The atoms of the first part/half according to the main COM of
the ligand are C2, C7, C8 and C9. As for the second part they are C3, C4, C5
and C6 atoms."
Think *very* carefully about how you made that decision. Was it
based *only* on the position of the centre of mas
50 matches
Mail list logo
