On 03/08/2017 12:27 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a fairly simple application that populates a GUI window with
> fields from a database table. The fields are defined/configured by a
> dictionary as follows:-
Instead of ordering the data in Python, why not rely on the GUI to do
the sort? Most G
Use multiprocessing since you want to do multiple things at once
https://pymotw.com/2/multiprocessing/basics.html If I understand you
correctly, once the string is found you would terminate the process, so you
would have to signal the calling portion of the code using a Manager dictionary
or l
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Chris Green wrote:
>> > dbcol['firstname'] = col('First Name', True, False)
>> > dbcol['lastname'] = col('Last Name', True, False)
>>
>> http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/false
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> > dbcol['firstname'] = col('First Name', True, False)
> > dbcol['lastname'] = col('Last Name', True, False)
>
> http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
>
Yes, I'm well aw
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> dbcol['firstname'] = col('First Name', True, False)
> dbcol['lastname'] = col('Last Name', True, False)
http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:03:31 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a fairly simple application that populates a GUI window with
> fields from a database table. The fields are defined/configured by a
> dictionary as follows:-
>
> #
> #
> # Address Book field details, dict
Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 11:27 AM, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > The for loop gets the items from the dictionary in an order that isn't
> > what I want. How can I configure things so they're in the order I want?
>
> What order do you want?
>
Well probably the First Name and Last Name, th
Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
>
> > I have a fairly simple application that populates a GUI window with
> > fields from a database table. The fields are defined/configured by a
> > dictionary as follows:-
> >
> > #
> > #
> > # Address Book field details, dictionary
Chris Green writes:
> I have a fairly simple application that populates a GUI window with
> fields from a database table. The fields are defined/configured by a
> dictionary as follows:-
>
> #
> #
> # Address Book field details, dictionary key is the database column
> #
>
On 03/08/2017 11:27 AM, Chris Green wrote:
The for loop gets the items from the dictionary in an order that isn't
what I want. How can I configure things so they're in the order I want?
What order do you want?
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have a fairly simple application that populates a GUI window with
fields from a database table. The fields are defined/configured by a
dictionary as follows:-
#
#
# Address Book field details, dictionary key is the database column
#
dbcol = {}
dbcol['firstname'] = co
Sayth Renshaw writes:
>> To find an unpaired number in linear time with minimal space, try
>> stepping through the list and either adding to a set or removing from
>> it. At the end, your set should contain exactly one element. I'll let
>> you write the actual code :)
>>
>> ChrisA
>
> ChrisA the
Sayth Renshaw writes:
> Peter I really like this
>
> The complete code:
>
from collections import Counter
def find_it(seq):
> ... [result] = [k for k, v in Counter(seq).items() if v % 3 == 0]
> ... return result
You confirmed to Chris that you want the item that occurs an o
Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Peter I really like this
>
> The complete code:
>
from collections import Counter
def find_it(seq):
> ... [result] = [k for k, v in Counter(seq).items() if v % 3 == 0]
> ... return result
> ...
test_seq = [20,1,-1,2,-2,3,3,5,5,1,2,4,20,4,-1,-2,5]
>>>
Peter I really like this
The complete code:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> def find_it(seq):
... [result] = [k for k, v in Counter(seq).items() if v % 3 == 0]
... return result
...
>>> test_seq = [20,1,-1,2,-2,3,3,5,5,1,2,4,20,4,-1,-2,5]
>>> find_it(test_seq)
But what ma
Analyser is the only iOS app that integrated both Python and R engines.
build-in popular Python modules for stats/machine learning/image processing:
numpy,scipy,matplotlib,scikit-learn,scikit-image,pandas,pymc,nilearn,astroML,statsmodels,astropy..
https://itunes.apple.com/cn/app/fen-xi-zhe/i
I've been unsuccessfully looking for an alternative for signals, that works in
threads.
After updating a script of mine from being single-threaded to being
multi-threaded, I realised that signals do not work in threads.
I've used signals to handle blocking operations that possibly take forever
Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have got this dictionary comprehension and it works but how can I do it
> better?
List comprehensions (that's what you have) are nice, but overused.
> from collections import Counter
>
> def find_it(seq):
> counts = dict(Counter(seq))
There is no need to
selphi...@gmail.com writes:
> I am trying to understand how to write good API documentation. I have read
> “7. Documenting Python” in the python developers guide [1] and skimmed the
> Doc-SIG email archives, but I still have some questions and I would
> appreciate your help. (Whenever I refer to
19 matches
Mail list logo
