On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I would prefer when it would generate:
> '[
> "An array",
> "with several strings",
> "as a demo"
> ]'
>
> Is this possible, or do I have to code this myself?
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/json.html?highlight=
from __future__ import division
from sympy import *
x, y, z, t = symbols('x y z t')
k, m, n = symbols('k m n', integer=True)
f, g, h = symbols('f g h', cls=Function)
class AA(object):
@staticmethod
def __additionFunction__(a1, a2):
return a1*a2 #Put what you want instead of
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 2:01:57 AM UTC-5, Gus_G wrote:
> Hello, what do you think about building a marketplace website on connection
> of python+django? End effect-side should look and work similar to these:
> https://zoptamo.com/uk/s-abs-c-uk, https://www.ownerdirect.com/ . What are
> yo
On 2016-12-02, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Grant Edwards :
>> In general CISC processors like x86, AMD64, 68K have read-modify-write
>> instructions that allow you to increment a memory location or
>> set/clear a bit in memory with a single instruction:
>>
>> INC.W [R0]# increment memory word
On 2016-12-02, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:11:18 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I don't know what the "addr" array contains, but if addr is a byte
>> string, then the "int()" call is not needed, in Pythong 3, a byte is
>> already an integer:
>>
>> def format_ip(a
Grant Edwards :
> In general CISC processors like x86, AMD64, 68K have read-modify-write
> instructions that allow you to increment a memory location or
> set/clear a bit in memory with a single instruction:
>
> INC.W [R0]# increment memory word whose addr is in register R0
The x86 instru
On 12/01/2016 08:39 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 7:26:18 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
>> How is it possible that the 'if' portion runs, then 44/100,000ths of a
>> second later my process yields to another process which deletes the
>> file, then my process continues.
>
> A
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:11:18 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I don't know what the "addr" array contains, but if addr is a byte
> string, then the "int()" call is not needed, in Pythong 3, a byte is
> already an integer:
>
> def format_ip(a):
>return '.'.join(str(b) for b in a)
>
> add
On 2016-12-02, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm not an expert on the low-level hardware details, so I welcome
> correction, but I think that you can probably expect that the OS can
> interrupt code execution between any two CPU instructions.
Yep, mostly. Some CPUs have "lock" features that allow two
On 2016-12-02, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:39:02 +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:
>
>> There'll be a couple more issues with the printing but they should be
>> easy enough.
>
> I finally figured it out, I think. I'm not sure if my changes are
> what you had in mind but it is
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
> Then Twisted made a strong case for an asynchronous approach. One of their
> claims (which I have no reason to doubt) was that, because each user
> 'session' spends most of its time waiting for something - keyboard input,
> reply from database
"Frank Millman" :
> Then Twisted made a strong case for an asynchronous approach. One of
> their claims (which I have no reason to doubt) was that, because each
> user 'session' spends most of its time waiting for something -
> keyboard input, reply from database, etc - their approach allows
> hund
"Steve D'Aprano" wrote in message
news:58417e2d$0$1612$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com...
My first impressions on this is that we have a couple of good models for
preemptive parallelism, threads and processes, both of which can do
everything that concurrency can do, and more, and both of whi
Steve D'Aprano :
> py> await x
> File "", line 1
> await x
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
"await" is only allowed inside a coroutine.
> So why do we need asyncio? What is it actually good for?
Asyncio is a form of cooperative multitasking. It presents a framework
of "fake thr
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:53 pm, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> well that works - but I think it it is possible to explain it, without
> actually understanding what it does behind the scences:
>
> x = foo()
> # schedule foo for execution, i.e. put it on a TODO list
>
> await x
> # run the TODO list u
15 matches
Mail list logo
