On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:34:29 -0700, chris alindi wrote:
> simple while loop range(10) if user press esc exits loop
If I understand you correctly you want to exit a while loop
with the ESC key. That can be done but it depends on the
platform. For Windows use this: (not tested)
import msvcrt
wh
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:34 am, chris alindi wrote:
> simple while loop range(10) if user press esc exits loop
Your post is not a question nor even a grammatical sentence? Would you like
us to guess what you mean? Or perhaps you could ask your question in actual
proper sentences?
If English is no
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 04:36:15 UTC+11, Robert Clove wrote:
>
Not yet. There are a few people working towards it though.
Grant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
simple while loop range(10) if user press esc exits loop
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-10-23, Jason Friedman wrote:
>>
>> for message in mailbox.mbox(sys.argv[1]):
>> if message.has_key("From") and message.has_key("To"):
>> addrs = message.get_all("From")
>> addrs.extend(message.get_all("To"))
>> for addr in addrs:
>>
On 2016-10-23, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2016-10-23, Jason Friedman wrote:
>>>
>>> for message in mailbox.mbox(sys.argv[1]):
>>> if message.has_key("From") and message.has_key("To"):
>>> addrs = message.get_all("From")
>>> addrs.extend(message.get_all("To"))
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:56:59PM -0400, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> Looking for a quick way to calculate lines of code/comments in a
> collection of Python scripts. This isn't a LOC per day per developer
> type analysis - I'm looking for a metric to quickly judge the complexity
> of a set of scripts
On 10/23/2016 03:12 AM, pic8...@gmail.com wrote:
import multiprocessing as mp
def bar(**kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
print a,kwargs[a]
arguments={'name':'Joe','age':20}
p=mp.Pool(processes=4)
p.map(bar,**arguments)
p.close()
p.join()
What are you trying to do? The map method is similar
>
> for message in mailbox.mbox(sys.argv[1]):
> if message.has_key("From") and message.has_key("To"):
> addrs = message.get_all("From")
> addrs.extend(message.get_all("To"))
> for addr in addrs:
> addrl = addr.lower()
>
> Interesting. Generally, I allocate cursors exactly at the same time as I open
> transactions;
> not sure if this works with the mysql connector, but with psycopg2
> (PostgreSQL), my code looks like this:
>
> with conn, conn.cursor() as cur:
> cur.execute(...)
> ... = cur.fetchall()
>
>
Ok, I solved to this way:
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
from selenium import webdriver
driver = webdriver.Chrome()
driver.get('http://www.betexplorer.com/soccer/russia/youth-\league/matchdetails.php?matchid=rLu2Xsdi')
pg_src = driver.page_source
driver.close()
soup = BeautifulSoup(pg_src, 'html.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> It really is that simple which is why I am baffled. Given the throughput is so
> low, if I close the cursor and connection at the end of loop and instantiate
> them
> both at the start of the loop, it works as expected but that's obviousl
> Perhaps you simplified too much, but changes between the select and the
> update could be lost. I think you need at least three states:
>
> 1 mark rows where baz is null (by setting baz to some value other than NULL
> or 42, 24, say: set baz = 24 where baz is NULL)
> 2 show marked rows (select
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have some code that I am testing on Windows without c extensions which
> runs on a RHEL server with c extensions. In a simplified test case as
> follows:
>
> connection = mysql.connector.connect(...)
> cursor = connection.cursor(cursor_class=MySQLCursorDict)
> while Tr
I have some code that I am testing on Windows without c extensions which
runs on a RHEL server with c extensions. In a simplified test case as follows:
connection = mysql.connector.connect(...)
cursor = connection.cursor(cursor_class=MySQLCursorDict)
while True:
cursor.execute('SELECT foo,biz
在 2016年10月22日星期六 UTC+8下午9:15:06，Frank Millman写道：
> wrote in message
> news:9c91a4cf-1f3e-43b3-b75c-afc96b0b4...@googlegroups.com...
>
> > I have read Anssi's post already before I sent the post. To be frankly, I
> can't understand why he got the right answer. I'm sorry for my silly. "So
> when we
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:15 pm, eryk sun wrote:
>
>> I meant the behavior seems to have been copied to align with generator
>> expressions, even though the cited rationale doesn't apply. I'm not
>> saying this is wrong. It's useful that the ex
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:41:45 -0400 wrote Adam Jensen:
> On 10/22/2016 05:47 AM, andy wrote:
>> I would type: help(mailbox) after importing it.
>
> I guess the output of that might be more meaningful once I understand
> the underlying structures and conventions.
yes - you are right. fortunatelly pyt
import multiprocessing as mp
def bar(**kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
print a,kwargs[a]
arguments={'name':'Joe','age':20}
p=mp.Pool(processes=4)
p.map(bar,**arguments)
p.close()
p.join()
Errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "post.py", line 9, in
p.map(bar,**arguments)
import multiprocessing as mp
def bar(**kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
print a,kwargs[a]
arguments={'name':'Joe','age':20}
p=mp.Pool(processes=4)
p.map(bar,**arguments)
p.close()
p.join()
Errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "post.py", line 9, in
p.map(bar,**arguments)
20 matches
Mail list logo
