meInvent bbird writes:
> after google a several solutions,
> First method i searched has memory error
> sock.send(json.dumps(StreamArray()))
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "pusher.py", line 43, in
> sock.send(json.dumps(StreamArray()))
> ...
> MemoryError
"MemoryError" means
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\queues.py", line 262, in _feed
send(obj)
PicklingError: Can't pickle : attribute lookup __builtin__.gen
erator failed
#python pusher.py tcp://*:8080
import sys
import time
import zmq
from multiprocessing import Queue
I'm trying to run a script that calls pyhop (from pyhop import pyhop). Details
here > https://docs.extrahop.com/5.0/extrahop-python-api/#metrics
I've followed the directions to install and import pyhop, but no matter what I
do, I always get the following error when running a script that calls p
pozz :
> All the tricks have a common goal: to discover bugs as soon as possible,
> mostly during compilation process. Indeed I usually find some bugs
> during compilation (or static analysis). It seems to me very important.
Yes, it can be very useful, and with Python, you sacrifice that.
> I wi
Gregory Ewing :
> Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> This suggests even the promoters of functional programming
>> intuitively prefer imperative programming, but that's ok as long as
>> it's all functional under the hood.
>
> You make it sound like functional programmers like functional
> programming becaus
Gregory Ewing writes:
> A bit more on SMFs, and then some I/O.
>
> http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/essays/monads/DemystifyingMonads2.html
Thanks.
It would be good to spell out SMF at the start of the page.
"The definition of / above" (__truediv__ method) was not given "above"
(in th
i install in ubunbu 14
pip install graphviz
pip install pycallgraph
martin@ubuntu:~/Downloads$ pycallgraph graphviz -- ./pusher.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/pycallgraph", line 25, in
with __pycallgraph.PyCallGraph(config=__config):
File "/usr/local/lib/pytho
after google a several solutions,
First method i searched has memory error
sock.send(json.dumps(StreamArray()))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "pusher.py", line 43, in
sock.send(json.dumps(StreamArray()))
File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 243, in dumps
return _de
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 4:06:36 PM UTC-7, pozz wrote:
> I come from the C language, that is a compiled and strongly typed
> language. I learned many good tricks to write good code in C: choose a
> coding style, turn on as many warnings as possible, explicitly declare
> static variables
One other thing. The OP mentioned coming from C. If you are old enough, you
will remember that many errors caught by gcc and other modern compilers
used to be detected by external checkers like lint. Most Makefiles had
"lint" targets in them.
So although you might associate all sorts of error dete
On 14-10-2016 1:07, pozz wrote:
> All the tricks have a common goal: to discover bugs as soon as possible,
> mostly during
> compilation process. Indeed I usually find some bugs during compilation (or
> static
> analysis). It seems to me very important.
I wanted to reply a bit more to this parag
pozz writes:
> All the tricks have a common goal: to discover bugs as soon as
> possible, mostly during compilation process. Indeed I usually find
> some bugs during compilation (or static analysis). It seems to me very
> important.
Do you also use static code analysis? Do you find that static c
On 14-10-2016 1:07, pozz wrote:
> I come from the C language, that is a compiled and strongly typed language.
C is far from a strongly typed language, IMO...
You can convert (cast) almost anything to anything else without compiler errors.
Have a a float? Ah yes no I mean treat it as a pointer to
On 2016-10-13, pozz wrote:
> However, I think the language interpreter could emit the error before
> launching the script even without executing the wrong instruction,
> because it perfectly knows how many arguments the function wants and
> that one instruction calls it with a wrong number of
> I can execute the script without any problem and I will not notice the
bug until I
> test exactly the erroneous line of code (the call with only one argument).
The key phrase there being "until I test..." There are static
analysis tools for Python like pylint. Given this simple module:
#!/usr/
I come from the C language, that is a compiled and strongly typed
language. I learned many good tricks to write good code in C: choose a
coding style, turn on as many warnings as possible, explicitly declare
static variables and functions (when needed), explicitly declare const
variables (if t
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
This suggests even the promoters of functional programming intuitively
prefer imperative programming, but that's ok as long as it's all
functional under the hood.
You make it sound like functional programmers like functional
programming because it gives them a warm fuzzy f
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Irmen de Jong wrote:
>
>>> On 12-10-2016 12:56, Robin Becker wrote:
>>>
I notice an extra space at the windows command prompt compared with 3.5,
is that
deliberate?
>
> Wow that was stupid, sorry. Anyway, I'm not seeing it with 3.6.0b2 either:
A bit more on SMFs, and then some I/O.
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/essays/monads/DemystifyingMonads2.html
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-10-13 22:45, Irmen de Jong wrote:
On 13-10-2016 23:43, MRAB wrote:
On 2016-10-13 20:42, Irmen de Jong wrote:
On 12-10-2016 12:56, Robin Becker wrote:
I notice an extra space at the windows command prompt compared with 3.5, is that
deliberate?
C:\ux\XB33>\python35\python
Python 3.5.0
On 13-10-2016 23:43, MRAB wrote:
> On 2016-10-13 20:42, Irmen de Jong wrote:
>> On 12-10-2016 12:56, Robin Becker wrote:
>>
>>> I notice an extra space at the windows command prompt compared with 3.5, is
>>> that
>>> deliberate?
>>>
C:\ux\XB33>\python35\python
Python 3.5.0 (v3.5.0:374f50
On 2016-10-13 20:42, Irmen de Jong wrote:
On 12-10-2016 12:56, Robin Becker wrote:
I notice an extra space at the windows command prompt compared with 3.5, is that
deliberate?
C:\ux\XB33>\python35\python
Python 3.5.0 (v3.5.0:374f501f4567, Sep 13 2015, 02:27:37) [MSC v.1900 64 bit
(AMD64)]
on
Anyone else having problems with pip and python 3.6.0b2?
Pip now fails to create launcher scripts:
File "c:\python36\lib\site-packages\pip\_vendor\distlib\scripts.py", line
351, in
_get_launcher
result = finder(distlib_package).find(name).bytes
File "c:\python36\lib\site-packages\pip\_ven
On 12-10-2016 12:56, Robin Becker wrote:
> I notice an extra space at the windows command prompt compared with 3.5, is
> that
> deliberate?
>
>> C:\ux\XB33>\python35\python
>> Python 3.5.0 (v3.5.0:374f501f4567, Sep 13 2015, 02:27:37) [MSC v.1900 64 bit
>> (AMD64)]
>> on win32
>> Type "help", "c
Daiyue Weng writes:
> I am wondering how to correct the code above (what it tries to do is
> basically trying one processing block, if not working, running another
> block of code in except). Also a warning 'Too broad exception clause'
> will be generated.
Yes. You need to be *very* clear about
Daiyue Weng wrote:
> Hi, I have seen code using try_except with no exceptions,
>
> from dateutil import parser
>
> try:
> from_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['from_date'],
> '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f')
> to_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['to_date'],
> '%Y-%m-%d %H
Daiyue Weng writes:
> Hi, I have seen code using try_except with no exceptions,
>
> from dateutil import parser
>
> try:
> from_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['from_date'],
> '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f')
> to_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['to_date'],
> '%Y-%m-%d %H:
Hi, I have seen code using try_except with no exceptions,
from dateutil import parser
try:
from_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['from_date'],
'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f')
to_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parameters['to_date'],
'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f')
except:
from_date = pa
On 10/13/2016 02:19 AM, meInvent bbird wrote:
> is it possible to git pull a part of directory such as sched
> and compile this subdirectory and pycparser it?
I'm sure you could but it wouldn't help you. The parts of the kernel
are modular but you can't compile them without configuring the whole
Zeus does code folding, syntax highlighting, smart indenting, code
navigation for the Python language.
In addition the latest Zeus release has moved off Python 2.7x and
now supports the latest Python 3.5x release.
To see what new visit this link:
http://www.zeusedit.com/whatsnew.html
Jussi
Gregory Ewing :
> Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> The way you can usually tell your functional language has given up
>> purity in favour of mutating implementations is that your code
>> actually runs with non-toy amounts of data :-)
>
> Hmmm. Your argument here seems to be: "Everyone knows that functional
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
The way you can usually tell your functional language has given up purity in
favour of mutating implementations is that your code actually runs with
non-toy amounts of data :-)
Hmmm. Your argument here seems to be: "Everyone knows
that functional languages are impractical,
is it possible to git pull a part of directory such as sched
and compile this subdirectory and pycparser it?
i got error when run gcc -E
git submodule add he...@github.com:hello/repo.git kernel/sched
cd kernel/sched
git pull
martin@ubuntu:~/Downloads/kernel/sched$ gcc -E -std=c99 *.c
# 1 "auto_g
On Thursday 13 October 2016 07:37, LongHairLuke wrote:
> Hi l am on my way to make a bot for the game Piano Tiles 2.
> But the code l have written so far saids invalid syntax at 2nd line. Here is
> my code:
Folks, look at the email address of the poster:
trolleri.trollface at gmail.com
He's pos
34 matches
Mail list logo
