On 5/2/2016 2:05 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:00, DFS wrote:
I tried the 10-loop test several times with all versions.
The results were 100% consistent: VBSCript xmlHTTP was always 2x faster
than any python method.
Are you absolutely sure you're comparing the same job
On 5/2/2016 12:31 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
To save a webpage to a file:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com
/ex/001.html","D:\file.html")
On 5/1/2016 9:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2016 03:04 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2016-05-01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
precedents. Are there commands that have such a
Thanks for the opinion. I should add that is not my code in first post it's
the code from Rosetta on how to do Conway's GOL.
I thought it looked ugly.
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:59 PM, DFS wrote:
> startTime = time.clock()
> for i in range(loops):
> r = urllib2.urlopen(webpage)
> f = open(webfile,"w")
> f.write(r.read())
> f.close
> endTime = time.clock()
> print "Finished urllib2 in %.2g seconds" %(endTi
On 5/2/2016 1:37 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:23 PM, DFS wrote:
Trying the rawstring thing (say it fast 3x):
webpage = "http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com/ex/001.html";
webfile = "D:\\econpy001.html"
urllib.urlretrieve(
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:00, DFS wrote:
> I tried the 10-loop test several times with all versions.
>
> The results were 100% consistent: VBSCript xmlHTTP was always 2x faster
> than any python method.
Are you absolutely sure you're comparing the same job in two languages? Is
VB using a local
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:04, DFS wrote:
> 0.2 is half as fast as 0.1, here.
>
> And two small numbers turn into bigger numbers when the webpage is big,
> and soon the download time differences are measured in minutes, not half
> a second.
It takes twice as long to screw a screw into timber than
On 5/2/2016 1:15 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:00 PM, DFS wrote:
I tried the 10-loop test several times with all versions.
Also how, _exactly_, are you testing this?
C:\Python27>python -m timeit "filename='C:\\test.txt';
webpage='http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com/ex/001.
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:21, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:08 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 5/2/2016 1:02 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>> >> I actually use "D:\\file.html" in my code.
>> >
>> > Or you can do that. But the whole point of raw strings is not having to
>> > escape slashes :)
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:23 PM, DFS wrote:
> Trying the rawstring thing (say it fast 3x):
>
> webpage = "http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com/ex/001.html";
>
>
> webfile = "D:\\econpy001.html"
> urllib.urlretrieve(webpage,webfile) WORKS
> ---
On 5/2/2016 1:02 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:51 PM, DFS wrote:
On 5/2/2016 12:31 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
To save a webpage to a file:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://eco
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:17 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Just looking for your opinion on style would you write it like this
> continually calling range or would you use enumerate instead, or neither
> (something far better) ?
I can't comment on your specific code because there's too much noise to
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:08 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 5/2/2016 1:02 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> >> I actually use "D:\\file.html" in my code.
> >
> > Or you can do that. But the whole point of raw strings is not having to
> > escape slashes :)
>
>
> Nice. Where/how else is 'r' used?
Raw strings are
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:04 PM, DFS wrote:
> And two small numbers turn into bigger numbers when the webpage is big,
> and soon the download time differences are measured in minutes, not half
> a second.
Are you sure of that? Have you determined that the time is not a
constant overhead verses
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:00 PM, DFS wrote:
> I tried the 10-loop test several times with all versions.
Also how, _exactly_, are you testing this?
C:\Python27>python -m timeit "filename='C:\\test.txt';
webpage='http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com/ex/001.html'; import urllib2;
r = urllib2.urlopen(we
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:04 PM, DFS wrote:
> And two small numbers turn into bigger numbers when the webpage is big, and
> soon the download time differences are measured in minutes, not half a
> second.
>
> So, any ideas?
So, measure with bigger web pages, and find out whether it's really a
2:1
On 5/2/2016 1:02 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:51 PM, DFS wrote:
On 5/2/2016 12:31 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
To save a webpage to a file:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://eco
On 5/2/2016 1:00 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:50 PM, DFS wrote:
On 5/2/2016 12:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:06 PM, DFS wrote:
Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.
On 5/2/2016 12:49 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
DFS writes:
Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
iterations, vs 0.88 for python.
[…]
urllib2 and requests were about the same speed as urllib.urlretrieve,
while pycurl was significantly slower (1.2 seconds).
Network
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:50 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 5/2/2016 12:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:06 PM, DFS wrote:
> >>> Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
> >>> iterations, vs 0
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:51 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 5/2/2016 12:31 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
> >> To save a webpage to a file:
> >> -
> >> 1. import urllib
> >> 2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com
On 5/2/2016 12:31 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
To save a webpage to a file:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com
/ex/001.html","D:\file.html")
On 5/2/2016 12:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:06 PM, DFS wrote:
Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
iterations, vs 0.88 for python.
...
I know it's asking a lot, but is there a r
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> One simple way to do that: Run the exact same test many times (say,
> 10 000 or so) on the same machine, and then compute the average of all
> the durations.
>
> Do the same for each different program, and then you may have more
> meaningfully co
DFS writes:
> Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
> iterations, vs 0.88 for python.
>
> […]
>
> urllib2 and requests were about the same speed as urllib.urlretrieve,
> while pycurl was significantly slower (1.2 seconds).
Network access is notoriously erratic in
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:06 PM, DFS wrote:
>> Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
>> iterations, vs 0.88 for python.
> ...
>> I know it's asking a lot, but is there a really fast AND really short
>> python
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 09:06 PM, DFS wrote:
> Then I tested them in loops - the VBScript is MUCH faster: 0.44 for 10
> iterations, vs 0.88 for python.
...
> I know it's asking a lot, but is there a really fast AND really short
> python solution for this simple thing?
0.88 is not fast enough for
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:39 PM, DFS wrote:
> To save a webpage to a file:
> -
> 1. import urllib
> 2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com
> /ex/001.html","D:\file.html")
> -
Note, for paths on windows y
I posted a little while ago about how short the python code was:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve(webpage, filename)
-
Which is very sweet compared to the VBScript version:
--
Also not using enumerate but no ugly for i range implementation
this one from code review uses a generator on live cells only.
http://codereview.stackexchange.com/a/108121/104381
def neighbors(cell):
x, y = cell
yield x - 1, y - 1
yield x, y - 1
yield x + 1, y - 1
yield
To save a webpage to a file:
-
1. import urllib
2. urllib.urlretrieve("http://econpy.pythonanywhere.com
/ex/001.html","D:\file.html")
-
That's it!
Coming from VB/A background, some of the stuff you can do with python -
Your code (below) is too garbled to be able to read
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 12:00:59 AM UTC+5:30, David Shi wrote:
> Hello, I am back. Thank you very much for your positive response.
> I am trying to use Pandas apply to execute a lookup function, so that we can
> put abbreviation in a new colu
Django is an excellent framework. you can use it with sqlite.
cheers
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Gordon Levi wrote:
> "Fetchinson ." wrote:
>
> >Hi folks,go >
> >I have a vo ery specific set of requirements for a task and was
> >wondering if anyone had good suggestions for the best set of
Looking at various Python implementations of Conway's game of life.
I came across one on rosetta using defaultdict.
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life#Python
Just looking for your opinion on style would you write it like this continually
calling range or would you use enumerate
On Mon, 2 May 2016 03:04 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-05-01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
precedents. Are there commands that have such an option?
>>>
>>> It's pretty r
On 01May2016 17:04, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2016-05-01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
precedents. Are there commands that have such an option?
It's pretty rare. It is assumed that Unix
On 01May2016 21:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Is there an environment variable to tell the application what you
consider "short", or should it read your mind?
How about $LINES? If it's less than that, it'll fit on one screen. Of
course, that
On 01May2016 20:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2016 05:28 pm, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 01May2016 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
So you expect the environment variable to say which of multiple pagers
you might want, but only when you already want a pager. Okay. How is
an app supposed
Le jeudi 28 avril 2016 10:36:27 UTC+2, Rahul Raghunath a écrit :
> 0
> down vote
> favorite
>
>
> I'm trying to create a simple http server with basic GET and POST
> functionality. The program is supposed to GET requests by printing out a
> simple webpage that greets a user and askes how
Hello, I am back. Thank you very much for your positive response.
I am trying to use Pandas apply to execute a lookup function, so that we can
put abbreviation in a new column, in accordance to a state name in another
column.
Does anyone knows how to make this to work?
Regards.DavidLook up funct
On 05/01/2016 09:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
It's pretty rare. It is assumed that Unix uses can type " | less"
Is nobody except me questioning the assumption that we're only talking about
Unix users?
Even Windows has "more".
--
~Ethan~
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 13:04, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-05-01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Is nobody except me questioning the assumption that we're only
> > talking about Unix users?
>
> Didn't the OP specify that he was writing a command-line utility for
> Linux/Unix?
We've been talking a
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:36:48 Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
> >> precedents. Are there commands that have such an option?
> >
> > It's pretty rare. It is assumed that Unix uses can typ
On 2016-05-01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>> In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
>>> precedents. Are there commands that have such an option?
>>
>> It's pretty rare. It is assumed that Unix uses can type " | less"
>
>
On May 1, 2016 10:20 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can you please recommend to me a python3 library that I can use for
scrapping JS
I'm not sure what you mean by that. The tool I use is Splinter. Install it
using pip.
that works on windows as well as linux?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
On Mon, 2 May 2016 02:30 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
>> precedents. Are there commands that have such an option?
>
> It's pretty rare. It is assumed that Unix uses can type " | less"
Is nobody except me questioning the assumption t
On 2016-05-01, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Grant Edwards :
>
>> On 2016-05-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Okay. How is an app supposed to know whether or not to use a pager?
>> Command line option.
>>
>>> How do you expect them to mindread?
>> Nope, just recognize '-p' or somesuch.
>
> In discussions
Grant Edwards :
> On 2016-05-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Okay. How is an app supposed to know whether or not to use a pager?
> Command line option.
>
>> How do you expect them to mindread?
> Nope, just recognize '-p' or somesuch.
In discussions like these, it would be important to draw from
pre
Hi,
can you please recommend to me a python3 library that I can use for scrapping
JS that works on windows as well as linux?
Regards.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-05-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>> Yes, PAGER=cat would make "man" also not page, and likely almost everything.
>> And yet I am unwilling to do so. Why?
>>
>> On reflection, my personal problems with this approach are twofold:
>>
>> - I want $PAGER t
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 1 May 2016 05:28 pm, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
>
>> On 01May2016 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>>So you expect the environment variable to say which of multiple pagers
>>>you might want, but only when you already want a pager. Okay.
On Sun, 1 May 2016 05:28 pm, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
> On 01May2016 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>So you expect the environment variable to say which of multiple pagers
>>you might want, but only when you already want a pager. Okay. How is
>>an app supposed to know whether or not to use a pager?
On Sun, 1 May 2016 04:44 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>> Yes, PAGER=cat would make "man" also not page, and likely almost
>> everything. And yet I am unwilling to do so. Why?
>>
>> On reflection, my personal problems with this approach are twofold:
>>
>> - I
On Sun, 01 May 2016 17:28:53 +1000, cs wrote:
> On 01May2016 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>>> Yes, PAGER=cat would make "man" also not page, and likely almost
>>> everything.
>>> And yet I am unwilling to do so. Why?
>>>
>>> On reflection, my personal pr
On 01May2016 16:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
Yes, PAGER=cat would make "man" also not page, and likely almost everything.
And yet I am unwilling to do so. Why?
On reflection, my personal problems with this approach are twofold:
- I want $PAGER to specify
56 matches
Mail list logo
