On 16/03/2016 10:52, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16-03-16 om 10:51 schreef Mark Lawrence:
On 16/03/2016 09:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16-03-16 om 09:47 schreef Mark Lawrence:
Same with switch. You can use a hash table etc. to simulate switches,
but only if the codeblocks are independent. Other
Op 16-03-16 om 10:51 schreef Mark Lawrence:
> On 16/03/2016 09:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 16-03-16 om 09:47 schreef Mark Lawrence:
>>>
Same with switch. You can use a hash table etc. to simulate switches,
but only if the codeblocks are independent. Otherwise, if-elif chains
Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a colleague of mine (I write this mail because I am on the list) has the
> following issue:
>
>
> for x in my_iterable:
> # do
> empty:
> # do something else
>
>
> What's the most Pythonic way of doing this?
What would you expect?
>>> class Empty(Exc
On 16.03.2016 11:28, Joaquin Alzola wrote:
If len(my_iterable) is not 0:
for x in my_iterable:
# do
else:
# do something else
I am sorry, I should have been more precise here.
my_iterable is an iterator that's exhausted after a complete iteration
and cannot be restored.
I
On 16/03/2016 04:06, Mario R. Osorio wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 9:55:27 PM UTC-4, jj0ge...@gmail.com wrote:
You have apparently mistaken me for someone who's worried. I don't use Python, I was
just curious as to why a construct that is found, not only to be useful in 95% of other
la
You could do something like ...
If len(my_iterable) is not 0:
for x in my_iterable:
# do
else:
# do something else
There should be a more code efficient way to do this.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list
[mailto:python-list-bounces+joaquin.alzola=lebara@python.org] On Be
Hi,
a colleague of mine (I write this mail because I am on the list) has the
following issue:
for x in my_iterable:
# do
empty:
# do something else
What's the most Pythonic way of doing this?
Best,
Sven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 16/03/2016 09:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16-03-16 om 09:47 schreef Mark Lawrence:
Same with switch. You can use a hash table etc. to simulate switches,
but only if the codeblocks are independent. Otherwise, if-elif chains
are the way to go. Command line parsing is a case where switch
stat
Op 16-03-16 om 09:47 schreef Mark Lawrence:
>
>>
>> Same with switch. You can use a hash table etc. to simulate switches,
>> but only if the codeblocks are independent. Otherwise, if-elif chains
>> are the way to go. Command line parsing is a case where switch
>> statements are often used, e.g. in
Christian Gollwitzer :
> That happens indeed if one were to simulate polymorphism using switch
> statements, but not for other cases.
There are not many other cases. Decoding is the only generally valid
case I can think of.
> In Python, you need to go the other way round, you don't have a
> swit
On 16/03/2016 08:13, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 16.03.16 um 05:26 schrieb Mark Lawrence:
So you would rather write something like:-
switch (x):
case COW:
moo()
break
case DUCK:
quack()
break
default IDUNNO:
panic()
than:-
x.makeNoise()
No sane person
Am 16.03.16 um 05:26 schrieb Mark Lawrence:
So you would rather write something like:-
switch (x):
case COW:
moo()
break
case DUCK:
quack()
break
default IDUNNO:
panic()
than:-
x.makeNoise()
No sane person would do that. But just because you selected the w
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 05:59, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> On a more constructive note, python(1) (CPython) creates a binary (byte-
> code) “.pyc” file from “.py” files when it runs them.
To be precise, it creates a .pyc file when the file is imported, not run.
Just running a Python
13 matches
Mail list logo
