On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 07:09 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Yes, git is a capable tool. But so is Mercurial, and the arguments
>> weren't primarily based on differences in functionality (which are
>> pretty minor). It's mainly about the network
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 1/1/2016 4:08 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> > There were three reasons given in Brett's decision message:
> >
> > 1. No major distinguishing features between GitHub or GitLab
It seems “complete source code available and freely licensed, allowing
the community to implemen
Zachary Ware writes:
> On Jan 1, 2016 2:35 PM, "Paul Rubin" wrote:
> > Will everyone wanting to submit patches be required to use a Github
> > account? Or will it be enough to put the patch in an outside repo
> > and link to it in the Python issue tracker? I'm glad that (it sounds
> > like) no G
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 07:09 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yes, git is a capable tool. But so is Mercurial, and the arguments
> weren't primarily based on differences in functionality (which are
> pretty minor). It's mainly about the network effect.
You call it the network effect. I call it monoculture
Terry Reedy writes:
> While the decision might not be my personal first choice, we
> absolutely need more core developers contributing, including reviewing
> contributed patches.
Yeah, I'm not delighted by the choice either, but as long as the core
devs have bought in and it doesn't affect non-co
On 1/1/2016 4:08 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
arguments about the choice. I am guessing that there have been some.
Ea
On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 10:05:29 AM UTC+1, Harbey Leke wrote:
> Create a class called BankAccount
>
> .Create a constructor that takes in an integer and assigns this to a
> `balance` property.
>
> .Create a method called `deposit` that takes in cash deposit amount and
> updates the ba
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 12:06:07 AM UTC+1, Won Chang wrote:
> i have gotten the answer of that problem
Please Can you post the answer you got. If convenient send to my email
xaviertim...@gmail.com.
Thanks in advance.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 31.12.15 05:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Fifteen years later, and Tim Peters' Stupid Python Trick is still the
undisputed champion!
It may be platform depended, but on my computer the obvious way is 10%
faster the Stupid Python Trick.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/1/16 1:24 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 31/12/2015 17:15, Rob Gaddi wrote:
>> I'm looking for some advice on handling data collection/analysis in
>> Python. ...
>> The whole process feels a bit grindy; like I keep having to do a lot of
>> ad-hoc stitching things together. And I keep hearing
On 01.01.16 21:00, paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:02 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
Fifteen years later, and Tim Peters' Stupid Python Trick is still the
undisputed champion!
And should we be happy about that revel
On 31/12/2015 17:15, Rob Gaddi wrote:
I'm looking for some advice on handling data collection/analysis in
Python. I do a lot of big, time consuming experiments in which I run a
long data collection (a day or a weekend) in which I sweep a bunch of
variables, then come back offline and try to cut
Zachary Ware writes:
> Correct, no GitHub account will be required for interactions on the
> bugs.python.org tracker, and a patch can move all the way through to commit
> entirely on the b.p.o tracker (just as currently).
Thanks.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
> others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
> arguments about the choice. I am guessing that there have been some.
Easiest would be to look through the arch
On 01/01/2016 20:03, paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, it is good to know that a decision has been made so that we can move
forward.
Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
arguments about
On Jan 1, 2016 2:35 PM, "Paul Rubin" wrote:
>
> Zachary Ware writes:
> > ... the canonical CPython repository will be moving to GitHub in the
> > near future. Note that we will *not* be using the GitHub issue
> > tracker or wiki, just the hosting and review/pull request system.
>
> Will everyone
Zachary Ware writes:
> ... the canonical CPython repository will be moving to GitHub in the
> near future. Note that we will *not* be using the GitHub issue
> tracker or wiki, just the hosting and review/pull request system.
Will everyone wanting to submit patches be required to use a Github
acc
Daniel, after the download, please be sure to verify the MD5 checksum to
know that the download is correct.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 11:24 AM, Daniel Lee wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> When I try to run python.exe on my computer with Windows 8,
>>
>
> Which e
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
>> It's not entirely clear whether that message is an acceptance of PEP 481
> or not.
>
> I've lost track of the pep numbers, but Brett's decision is final; the
> canonical CPython repository will be moving to GitHub in the near future.
> Note th
Mark, it is good to know that a decision has been made so that we can move
forward.
Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
arguments about the choice. I am guessing that there have been some.
If
On Jan 1, 2016 1:47 PM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Mark Lawrence
wrote:
> > Please see
> > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-January/000345.html
> >
> > This should encourage developers at all levels to help out, such that
the
> > list of open i
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Please see
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-January/000345.html
>
> This should encourage developers at all levels to help out, such that the
> list of open issues on the bug tracker falls drastically.
How does that inte
Please see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-January/000345.html
This should encourage developers at all levels to help out, such that
the list of open issues on the bug tracker falls drastically.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what
On 01/01/2016 19:16, PythonLearner wrote:
Hello All,
I'm new to this group.
I'm looking for examples for Multiple and Multilevel Inheritance without the
use of super().
Thanks
An Avid Python Learner
Please tell us what you're trying to achive, as without super() you'll
be throwing DRY right
Hello All,
I'm new to this group.
I'm looking for examples for Multiple and Multilevel Inheritance without the
use of super().
Thanks
An Avid Python Learner
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:02 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> >> Fifteen years later, and Tim Peters' Stupid Python Trick is still the
> >> undisputed champion!
> >
> > And should we be happy about that revelation, or sad?
>
> Yes!
>
>
Which one,
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, tdspe...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to create a directory on a windows drive from my macbook air with
> python but get a permissions error because the windows ntfs drive is read
> only - does anyone know away to overcome this issue - I have looked
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:27 PM, wrote:
> I connect to a drive in a windows 10 computer smb://192.168.50.58/c from my
> mac but the drive is read only - i am looking for away to make the drive
> writable so I can make a directory on the drive from my python script.
>
You'll have to look into
On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 7:13:41 PM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 9:56 PM, wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am trying to create a directory on a windows drive from my macbook air
> > with python but get a permissions error because the windows ntfs drive is
> > read only
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 9:56 PM, wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to create a directory on a windows drive from my macbook air with
> python but get a permissions error because the windows ntfs drive is read
> only - does anyone know away to overcome this issue - I have looked for a
> utility bu
Hi All
I am trying to create a directory on a windows drive from my macbook air with
python but get a permissions error because the windows ntfs drive is read only
- does anyone know away to overcome this issue - I have looked for a utility
but have yet to find an answer.
Regards and Happy New
On 01/01/2016 00:25, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 31/12/2015 18:54, Karim wrote:
On 31/12/2015 19:18, otaksoftspamt...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to check a string over which I have no control for the first 2
non-white space characters (which should be '[{').
The string would ideally be: '[{...' b
otaksoftspamt...@gmail.com writes:
> I need to check a string over which I have no control for the first 2
> non-white space characters (which should be '[{').
>
> The string would ideally be: '[{...' but could also be something like
> ' [ { '.
>
> Best to use re and how? Something else?
> On 2016-01-01, at 07:43, Brian Simms wrote:
>
> when I go into Terminal to run "setup.py install" I keep getting "-bash:
> command not found".
Try:
python setup.py install
Greetings,
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
34 matches
Mail list logo
