On 11/1/2015 7:50 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
* 'Save-as' is not part of the regular workflow. It is done once per
file. Experienced users who know to avoid stdlib names will not see
the messages unless they accidentally duplicate one -- which is
possible because there are now s
Am 02.11.15 um 06:30 schrieb amn...@gmail.com:
Dear all;
I want to code algorithm in Python for driving from Arad to Bucharest as
quickly as possible.
It sounds a lot like a homework problem. If so, look into your notes for
"Dijkstra algorithm", or "A* algorithm". If not, look for a library
On 02/11/2015 00:08, Daniel Joffe wrote:
WinXP...32 bits...professional
I keep getting message
note also that there is no place on the install box to start...you just
click somewhere, and the install started.
I'm afraid you've been bitten by the fact that we no longer support
Windows XP an
WinXP...32 bits...professional
I keep getting message
note also that there is no place on the install box to start...you just
click somewhere, and the install started.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
amn...@gmail.com writes:
> I need a help in completing the Class Roaming problem using Euclidean
> function , Completing the Class Node .
I think you need to research how to solve this algorithm, and only
*then* think about how to code it in Python.
Is this a homework assignment?
> And def
Dear all;
I want to code algorithm in Python for driving from Arad to Bucharest as
quickly as possible.
I formulated the problem in python as following :
1- States : Various cities.
2- Actions : Drive distances between different cities.
3- Goal : To be in Bucharest.
class Problem:
def __ini
Hi All,
I'm pleased to announce the release of testfixtures 4.4.0. This is a
feature release that adds the following:
- Add support for labelling the arguments passed to compare().
- Allow expected and actual keyword parameters to be passed to
compare().
- Fix "TypeError: unorderable types
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> - Python as a whole should move "" from the start of sys.path to the end (or
> at least the middle, after the stdlib) so as to avoid accidental shadowing.
>
> - Even if Python doesn't do this, IDLE could do it, and could do it
> immediately
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:43 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Remember, people can click a direct download link
>> *on the python.org front page* and be immediately downloading Python 2
>> or 3 for the OS that the browser announces. Where would y
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:43 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Remember, people can click a direct download link
> *on the python.org front page* and be immediately downloading Python 2
> or 3 for the OS that the browser announces. Where would you put the
> big fat noisy warning?
Maybe the website shouldn'
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:07 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 11/1/2015 11:17 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>> In a message of Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:27:23 +1100, "Steven D'Aprano" writes
>> a reply to Michael Overtoon:
>
> He was actually responding to my proposal to warn about duplicating
> stdlib names wh
On 11/1/2015 10:54 AM, Michiel Overtoom wrote:
On 01 Nov 2015, at 16:43, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that
offer a Windows download not say a word about it not running on
Windows XP?
I'm also curious why Python 3.5 won't run on Wi
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:17 am, Laura Creighton wrote:
> I managed to delete the real mail I would like to reply to.
> This is, at least in the same thread
>
> In a message of Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:27:23 +1100, "Steven D'Aprano" writes
> a reply to Michael Overtoon:
Actually it's a reply to Terr
Terry Reedy writes:
> * 'Save-as' is not part of the regular workflow. It is done once per
> file. Experienced users who know to avoid stdlib names will not see
> the messages unless they accidentally duplicate one -- which is
> possible because there are now so many. I personally would like be
On 11/1/2015 5:28 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
todo list for more than a week now.
Not sure why it hasn't happened.
Thank you for the reminder.
On 11/1/2015 11:17 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:27:23 +1100, "Steven D'Aprano" writes
a reply to Michael Overtoon:
He was actually responding to my proposal to warn about duplicating
stdlib names when saving-as.
Users are inclined to ignore alerts, dialogs
On 11/1/2015 9:05 AM, Vindhyachal Takniki wrote:
I have made a python code & using multithreading in it. this is very basic code,
not using queues & other stuff.
You can run multiple windows, or one window with multiple panes, in one
thread with one event loop. Best to do gui stuff in the ma
writes:
> This would make an excellent opportunity to develop a curriculum to
> teach students how to maintain a 2.x and 3.x code base using 2to3.
The advice today reflects the great progress that has been made over
many years of migrating projects and organisations to Python 3.
Instead of ‘2to
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:28 AM, boB Stepp wrote:
> Of course if such
> people would only type in their issue into their favorite search
> engine... But that is a different issue--heavy sigh!
In their defense, "the installer for Python has a blank window" isn't
nearly as internet-searchable as an
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
> message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
> todo list for more than a week now.
>
> Not sure why it hasn't happened.
>
> Thank you for the reminder.
I have to confess I do not unde
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:27 AM, LJ wrote:
> Im wondering if there is a way in which I can use PyPy to solve the just
> subproblems in parallel, and return to CPython for the overall routines.
>
You could. What you'd have would be a setup where the subprocess is
utterly independent of the parent;
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>> We teach 3.4 (because that's what's available on the Ubuntu VMs that
>> we're recommending; anything 3.2+ will probably work just the same),
>> and that's it.
>
> The async keyword seems like one of Py3's bigger improve
Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
todo list for more than a week now.
Not sure why it hasn't happened.
Thank you for the reminder.
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
By the way, Im using python 2.7.
Thanks
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi All.
I hope you're having a good weekend. Im working on a large scale optimization
problem which invokes the Gurobi solver from python. Before invoking the solver
I use pure python to solve five subproblems in parallel using the
multiprocessing module. These subproblems are the bottleneck of
On 2015-11-01 19:41, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
On 11/01/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
[snip]
That is really shitty customer relations.
See above, and define 'customer'.
customer: the people to whom you are provi
Chris Angelico writes:
> We teach 3.4 (because that's what's available on the Ubuntu VMs that
> we're recommending; anything 3.2+ will probably work just the same),
> and that's it.
The async keyword seems like one of Py3's bigger improvements and it
makes its appearance in 3.5, iirc.
--
https:/
On 11/01/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>> I dont recall seeing anyone posting asking why they could not get
>> Python to install on Windows 95 recently. I only read this group
>> intermittently but I have seen *many* post
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:56:33 +, Grant Edwards writes:
>On 2015-11-01, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>> The whole message of 'get a newer os' is decidedly hard for them.
>> "It works fine, like my 2004 Ford car" they want to tell you.
>
>Except it _doesn't_ work fine, or they wouldn't b
On 2015-11-01, Laura Creighton wrote:
> The whole message of 'get a newer os' is decidedly hard for them.
> "It works fine, like my 2004 Ford car" they want to tell you.
Except it _doesn't_ work fine, or they wouldn't be complaining.
If you want to run Python 3.5, then XP just doesn't work. Wh
The important thing is that, numbers-wise, windowsXP was the
version of computer a whole lot of people got when they got
their first computer.
The notion of, not it "wearing out" but that the whole world
"wore out" or "advanced beyond" them is foreign to them.
They aren't computer-hobbyists -- t
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Windows XP has now been around for twelve years.
>
> It's older than that. Release date was August 1, 2001. More than 14
> years ago. My how the time flies.
>
> Though more recent versions o
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
> I dont recall seeing anyone posting asking why they could not get
> Python to install on Windows 95 recently. I only read this group
> intermittently but I have seen *many* posts asking why they couldnt
> install on XP.
>
> You ack
On 11/01/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Windows XP has now been around for twelve years.
It's older than that. Release date was August 1, 2001. More than 14
years ago. My how the time flies.
Though more recent versions of Windows have added features (which Python
now takes advantage o
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 8:52:55 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:43 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
> > Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> > a Windows download not say a word about it not running on Windows XP?
> >
> > Eve
I managed to delete the real mail I would like to reply to.
This is, at least in the same thread
In a message of Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:27:23 +1100, "Steven D'Aprano" writes
a reply to Michael Overtoon:
> Users are inclined to ignore alerts, dialogs and error messages, and
> applications try ve
> On 01 Nov 2015, at 16:43, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> a Windows download not say a word about it not running on Windows XP?
I'm also curious why Python 3.5 won't run on Windows XP. Which features does it
use th
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:43 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
> Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> a Windows download not say a word about it not running on Windows XP?
>
> Even if one is anal enough to go to the page about the 3.5 release.
> https://www.pyt
On 11/01/2015 03:06 AM, Chris Warrick wrote:
> On 1 November 2015 at 09:23, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> hi, i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer
>> for windows XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to
>> select, it was a white board and the onl
On 01/11/2015 14:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I remember from a few weeks back, a
teacher with the same problem posted this on the mailinglist. Eventually
she had a technician coming in to reinstall Windows, just to fix this
problem ;-) What an overkill...
If that is true, that's really sad. Were
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>>I'd rather not use 2to3 there. If you want to maintain a library that
>>can be used from 2.x and 3.x, it's much better to aim for the
>>compatible middle - u prefixes on all Unicode strings, b prefixes on
>>all byte strings, stick to ASCII w
In a message of Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:27:24 +1100, Chris Angelico writes:
>On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:11 AM, wrote:
>> On Nov 1, 2015 2:45 AM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm proud to say that a Python tutoring company has just converted its
>>> course over from teaching Python 2.7 to teaching 3
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 01:50 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/31/2015 9:45 PM, Michiel Overtoom wrote:
>> I'd go even a step further. I think IDLE should not only warn, but
>
> The warning will require a choice, with the default (if one just hits
> ) being to reject the duplicate and go back to the Sa
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Vindhyachal Takniki
wrote:
> #get reading at every 1 second
> def get_analog_1(thread_name):
> global read_ok_1, current_time_1,analog_1
> while True:
> if((time.time() - current_time_1) > 1):
> if(0 == read_ok_1):
> curre
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 12:45 pm, Michiel Overtoom wrote:
>
>> On 31 Oct 2015, at 06:59, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> This is a different issue than IDLE avoiding clashes. I opened
>> https://bugs.python.org/issue25522
>
> Terry, thanks for recording this into the issue tracker.
>
> I'd go even a step fu
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:11 AM, wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2015 2:45 AM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>>
>> I'm proud to say that a Python tutoring company has just converted its
>> course over from teaching Python 2.7 to teaching 3.x. For the
>> naysayers out there, it actually wasn't much of a transition;
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 06:05:58 -0800, Vindhyachal Takniki writes:
>I have made a python code & using multithreading in it. this is very basic
>code, not using queues & other stuff.
This is your problem.
The code that uses queues is more basic.
For tkinter you cannot use threads like yo
On Nov 1, 2015 2:45 AM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>
> I'm proud to say that a Python tutoring company has just converted its
> course over from teaching Python 2.7 to teaching 3.x. For the
> naysayers out there, it actually wasn't much of a transition;
This would make an excellent opportunity to de
I have made a python code & using multithreading in it. this is very basic
code, not using queues & other stuff.
1. Task is to create two independent Tkinter windows
2. Code has four files:
main.py:creates individual thread
analog.py: generate random values every 1 sec & 10 sec
screen.py: Tkint
gers antifx wrote:
> I have to write a LU-decomposition. My Code worked so far but (I want to
> become better:) ) I want to ask you, if I could write this
> LU-decomposition in a better way?
>
> def LU(x):
> L = np.eye((x.shape[0]))
> n = x.shape[0]
> for ii in range(n-1):
> f
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 11:24:55 +0100, Laura Creighton writes:
>In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:23:15 +0200, t_ciorba--- via Python-list wr
>ites:
>>hi,
>>i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
>>XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:23:15 +0200, t_ciorba--- via Python-list wr
ites:
>hi,
>i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
>XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to select, it was a white
>board and the only button on it was "cancel". here is
Am 30.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Robinson, Wendy:
Hi there,
I installed Python 3.5.0 64-bit for Windows yesterday and tried some
basic programs successfully.
This morning I rebooted my computer and can’t get a single one to work.
The interpreter seems to be fine and the environment variables look
In a message of Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:20:23 -0700, "Robinson, Wendy" writes:
>Hi there,
>I installed Python 3.5.0 64-bit for Windows yesterday and tried some basic
>programs successfully.
>This morning I rebooted my computer and can't get a single one to work. The
>interpreter seems to be fine and
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:04 PM, gers antifx wrote:
> I have to write a LU-decomposition. My Code worked so far but (I want to
> become better:) ) I want to ask you, if I could write this LU-decomposition
> in a better way?
>
> def LU(x):
> L = np.eye((x.shape[0]))
> n = x.shape[0]
>
Robinson, Wendy wrote:
> Hi there,
> I installed Python 3.5.0 64-bit for Windows yesterday and tried some basic
> programs successfully.
> This morning I rebooted my computer and can't get a single one to work.
> The interpreter seems to be fine and the environment variables look
> correct. But
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:23 PM, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
wrote:
>
> i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
> XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to select, it was a white
> board and the only button on it was "cancel".
>
Yep. The installer isn
On 1 November 2015 at 09:23, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
wrote:
>
> hi,
> i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
> XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to select, it was a white
> board and the only button on it was "cancel". here is a screen of it
Hey,
I have to write a LU-decomposition. My Code worked so far but (I want to become
better:) ) I want to ask you, if I could write this LU-decomposition in a
better way?
def LU(x):
L = np.eye((x.shape[0]))
n = x.shape[0]
for ii in range(n-1):
for ll in range(1+ii,n):
hi,
i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to select, it was a white
board and the only button on it was "cancel". here is a screen of it:
when i click on random points of this empty board, i get random stuff,
Hi there,
I installed Python 3.5.0 64-bit for Windows yesterday and tried some basic
programs successfully.
This morning I rebooted my computer and can't get a single one to work. The
interpreter seems to be fine and the environment variables look correct. But
every py file I try to run at the
What error message do you get exactly ? without error message how
people gonna know what is going on?
best wishes,
-navid
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:53 AM, josephine ewers via Python-list
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am doing an online training c
I'm proud to say that a Python tutoring company has just converted its
course over from teaching Python 2.7 to teaching 3.x. For the
naysayers out there, it actually wasn't much of a transition; putting
parentheses around all print calls, plus changing the way virtual
environments get created, pret
63 matches
Mail list logo
