On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 12:04:18 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> At
> >> https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-i
On 11/10/2015 06:57, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 11:09:17 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 11/10/2015 06:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-t
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> At
>> https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
>>
>> it says
>> In Py
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:53 PM, dieter wrote:
> Otherwise, you can likely use a technique called "monkey patching".
> This is dynamically changing code at startup time.
> In your case, it could look like:
>
>from ... import Node
>
>def new_method(self, ...):
> ...
>
>Node.new_me
Rustom Mody writes:
> On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 11:09:17 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On 11/10/2015 06:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > At https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/[…]
> > >
> > > it says
> > > In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list,
> > > dict, e
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> At
> https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
>
> it says
> In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, li
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 11:09:17 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 06:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > At
> > https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
> >
> > it says
speeze.pear...@gmail.com writes:
> ...
> Someone wrote a library that creates and manipulates `Node`s.
> I would like to write another layer on top of this, to make
> trees that behave just like the library's trees, but whose nodes
> have some extra methods.
If you are happy, the library supports
Johannes Bauer writes:
> I'm running an Apache 2.4 webserver using mod_wsgi 4.3.0. There are two
> different applications running in there running on two completely
> separate vhosts.
>
> I'm seeing some weird crosstalk between them which I do not understand.
> In particular, crosstalk concerning
On 11/10/2015 06:11, Rustom Mody wrote:
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
it says
In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list, dict,
etc.
So
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> At
> https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
>
> it says
> In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, l
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
it says
In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list, dict,
etc.
So is it 3.5 or 2.2?
For some reason google
At
https://docs.python.org/3.5/faq/extending.html#can-i-create-an-object-class-with-some-methods-implemented-in-c-and-others-in-python-e-g-through-inheritance
it says
In Python 2.2, you can inherit from built-in classes such as int, list, dict,
etc.
So is it 3.5 or 2.2?
For some reason google
On 10/09/2015 10:26 AM, John Michael Lafayette wrote:
> I would like Python to have a strong typing feature that can co-exist with
> the current dynamic typing system. Currently Python is like this:
>
> var animal = Factory.make("dog") # okay.
> var dog = Factory.make("dog") # okay.
Laura Creighton wrote:
don't fear mixins and multiple
inheritance unduly. They are a practical solution for a lot of
problems. You might have one of them.
I don't think mixins are a solution here, because they
still require controlling the instantiation of the classes
so that you can substitu
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 04:02 am, speeze.pear...@gmail.com wrote:
> (This is a long post, but the question is simple. Most of this is
> just me enumerating what I've already tried.)
>
> Someone wrote a library that creates and manipulates `Node`s.
> I would like to write another layer on top of this,
On 09/10/2015 17:26, John Michael Lafayette wrote:
I would like Python to have a strong typing feature that can co-exist
with the current dynamic typing system. Currently Python is like this:
var animal = Factory.make("dog") # okay.
var dog = Factory.make("dog") # okay.
var
In a message of Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:39:29 +0100, Mark Lawrence writes:
>On 10/10/2015 07:15, Sébastien Pinsonneault wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've downloaded Python 3.5.0 64 bits, but I can't open it. It ask me
>> each time if I want to modify, repair or uninstall, but doesn't open.
>>
>> I have Windows
On 10/10/2015 2:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Shreenivas Potnis wrote:
I have 32 bit machine with XP service pack 3.
I installed x86 version of python.
While running I get the following error:
Python 3.5 does not run on XP.
One of the goals for the 3.5.1
On 09/10/2015 17:03, John Michael Lafayette wrote:
I would like Python to have a strong typing feature that can co-exist
with the current dynamic typing system. Currently Python is like this:
var animal = Factory.make("dog") #okay
var dog = Factory.make("dog") #okay
As Ben Finney has all read
On 10/10/2015 07:15, Sébastien Pinsonneault wrote:
Hi,
I've downloaded Python 3.5.0 64 bits, but I can't open it. It ask me
each time if I want to modify, repair or uninstall, but doesn't open.
I have Windows 10 64 bits.
Thx
Check out the issue tracker as there are known problems. If you'r
In a message of Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:02:24 -0700, speeze.pear...@gmail.com write
s:
>I should just use the existing library's `Node` class, and write
>my library in a functional style. Don't define `MyNode.foo()`,
>instead define `mylibrary.foo(my_node)`.
>I've got nothing against functional progra
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
> (This is a long post, but the question is simple. Most of this is
> just me enumerating what I've already tried.)
>
> Someone wrote a library that creates and manipulates `Node`s.
> I would like to write another layer on top of this, to make
> trees that
(This is a long post, but the question is simple. Most of this is
just me enumerating what I've already tried.)
Someone wrote a library that creates and manipulates `Node`s.
I would like to write another layer on top of this, to make
trees that behave just like the library's trees, but whose nodes
Laura,
Thanks for the pointer to PyXB, I think this will work for my purposes and it
appears to be Python 3.4 / Windows compatible.
Thank you to all who helped.
On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 1:14:32 PM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:24:34 -0700, Gary Hanyze
On 10/10/2015 4:42 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>To avoid this, I have adopted this habit -
>
>export_spreekwoorden = (
>"SELECT spreekwoord "
>"FROM spreekwoorden "
>"ORDER BY spreekwoord COLLATE LOCALIZED"
>)
>
>To my eye, the result is nicer, at virtually no extra effort. Just
>don't forget the
Hi there,
I'm running an Apache 2.4 webserver using mod_wsgi 4.3.0. There are two
different applications running in there running on two completely
separate vhosts.
I'm seeing some weird crosstalk between them which I do not understand.
In particular, crosstalk concerning the locales of the two.
On Saturday 10 Oct 2015 13:42 CEST, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> On Saturday 10 Oct 2015 09:45 CEST, Frank Millman wrote:
>
>> "Cecil Westerhof" wrote in message
>> news:87a8rsnkmw@equus.decebal.nl...
>>
>> This has got nothing to do with your question (which I found
>> interesting) but I thought
On Saturday 10 Oct 2015 09:45 CEST, Frank Millman wrote:
> "Cecil Westerhof" wrote in message
> news:87a8rsnkmw@equus.decebal.nl...
>
> This has got nothing to do with your question (which I found
> interesting) but I thought I would mention it.
>
>> export_spreekwoorden is defined as:
>> expo
"Cecil Westerhof" wrote in message news:87a8rsnkmw@equus.decebal.nl...
This has got nothing to do with your question (which I found interesting)
but I thought I would mention it.
export_spreekwoorden is defined as:
export_spreekwoorden= '''
SELECT spreekwoord
FROM
John Michael Lafayette writes:
> I would like Python to have a strong typing feature that can co-exist
> with the current dynamic typing system.
You have incorrectly conflated two separate matters.
The opposite of string typing is weak typing. Python has strong typing:
its objects will only beh
31 matches
Mail list logo
