On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 10:40:57 -0700, Ronald Cosentino wrote:
> def funA(x,y,z):
> return (x+y) * z
> def funB(x,y):
> return(x-y)
> print(funA(4,funB(2,3), funB(3,2)))
>
> the answer is 3. I don't know how it works.
def funA(x, y, z):
return (x+y) * z
def funB(x, y):
return (x-y)
hi,
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Ronald Cosentino wrote:
> def funA(x,y,z):
> return (x+y) * z
> def funB(x,y):
> return(x-y)
> print(funA(4,funB(2,3), funB(3,2)))
>
> the answer is 3. I don't know how it works.
it's simple:
- there is a "composition of functions", generall
Hi Ronald,
Answers inline.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list
[mailto:python-list-bounces+joseph.lee22590=gmail@python.org] On Behalf
Of Ronald Cosentino
Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2015 10:41 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: function code snippet that has function calls I have
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Ronald Cosentino
wrote:
> def funA(x,y,z):
> return (x+y) * z
>
The above takes 3 values and returns a value
> def funB(x,y):
> return(x-y)
>
The above takes 2 values and returns a value
> print(funA(4,funB(2,3), funB(3,2)))
>
you are printing the resu
def funA(x,y,z):
return (x+y) * z
def funB(x,y):
return(x-y)
print(funA(4,funB(2,3), funB(3,2)))
the answer is 3. I don't know how it works.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In a message of Sat, 03 Oct 2015 08:38:53 -0600, Michael Torrie writes:
>On 10/03/2015 03:19 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>> With better searching, I find this bug.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1501345
>>
>> Looks like that's the real one.
>
>This ubuntu bug and
On 10/02/2015 02:23 PM, Kenneth L wrote:
> No don't tell me what to do. I joined the military 3 years ago. You
> wouldn't believe the stuff I wasn't able to do before but now I am.
> You can keep your advice to yourself. I wasn't asking for something
> simple. I was asking for a starting point. The
On 10/03/2015 03:19 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> With better searching, I find this bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1501345
>
> Looks like that's the real one.
This ubuntu bug and the other bug you mention seem to be about FTDI
devices. Rob said in his origi
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:21 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:39:26 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>>I have a document written in Restructured Text format, and I use lots of
>>footnotes:
[...]
> You shouldn't have numbered them manually in the first place.
> Use '#' i
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:12 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
> People think logically
LOL :-)
--
Steven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In a message of Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:39:26 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>I have a document written in Restructured Text format, and I use lots of
>footnotes:
>
>blah blah blah [1]_ and blah blah blah [2]_.
>blah blah [3]_ blah ... blah blah
>blah blah [999]_.
>
>.. [1] fe
>..
Actually, the fact that adults have more difficulty processing
negations is one of the earliest things proven experimentally
in experimental psychology.
Clark, H., & Chase, W. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against
pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.
is one of the most hea
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I need to add a footnote between [2] and [3], but I don't want to have to
> renumber the following 997 footnotes by hand. Is there something I can do,
> within the syntax of ReST itself, to help?
Now that they're all numbered manually? Not
I have a document written in Restructured Text format, and I use lots of
footnotes:
blah blah blah [1]_ and blah blah blah [2]_.
blah blah [3]_ blah ... blah blah
blah blah [999]_.
.. [1] fe
.. [2] fi
.. [3] fo
...
.. [999] fum
I need to add a footnote between
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 04:35 pm, neubyr wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any resource that explains why certain methods
> like str() and type() were implemented the way they are, rather than
> .to_string() or .type() instance/object methods.
There is a FAQ that might help with this question:
htt
On 03/10/2015 11:29, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:45 am, John Gordon wrote:
I find this discussion about the relative readability of
not 0 <= x <= 10 #1
versus
0 < x or x > 10 #2
0 < x or 10 < x
to be a good example of people's propensity to invent so-called "rational"
ju
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:45 am, John Gordon wrote:
> In <87r3le1ht3@elektro.pacujo.net> Marko Rauhamaa
> writes:
[...]
>> Wouldn't
>
>>x < 0 or 10 < x
>
>> be even more visual?
>
> I don't know what you mean by "more visual".
>
> In my opinion, when comparing a variable to a constant, it
On 10/3/2015 2:35 AM, neubyr wrote:
I was wondering if there is any resource that explains why certain
methods like str() and type()
These are classes. Calling a class calls the class construction and
initialization functions. These return an instance of the class.
While reading the tutoria
With better searching, I find this bug.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1501345
Looks like that's the real one.
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In a message of Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:07:04 +0200, Laura Creighton writes:
>In a message of Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:36:23 -, Rob Gaddi writes:
>>So, this is odd. I'm running Ubuntu 14.04, and my system did a kernel
>>upgrade from the repository from 3.13.0-63-generic to 3.13.0-65-generic.
>>And p
In a message of Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:36:23 -, Rob Gaddi writes:
>So, this is odd. I'm running Ubuntu 14.04, and my system did a kernel
>upgrade from the repository from 3.13.0-63-generic to 3.13.0-65-generic.
>And pyserial (2.7, installed through pip) stopped working.
>
>Specifically, when I
In a message of Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:35:28 -0700, neubyr writes:
>I was wondering if there is any resource that explains why certain methods
>like str() and type() were implemented the way they are, rather than
>.to_string() or .type() instance/object methods.
>
>I find instance/object methods more
22 matches
Mail list logo
