Am 15.05.15 um 05:58 schrieb Skybuck Flying:
Thanks for the ideas, I haven't tried them yet.
I wonder if they will work in a multi-threaded fashion.
I doubt it.
The run_script runs in it's own thread.
It would be of enormous help if you would create a minimal script just
like the above for
BartC wrote:
It appears to be those "<=" and "+" operations in the code above where
much of the time is spent. When I trace out the execution paths a bit
more, I'll have a better picture of how many lines of C code are
involved in each iteration.
The path from decoding a bytecode to the C cod
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>> Yes, but sometimes it's at the file system's discretion - particularly
>> when you're working with network mounts. The application may not even
>> know that the file got hard deleted.
>
> Citation needed.
>
> "Move to trash" is a move oper
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:56 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On May 14, 2015 7:55 PM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>>> (Though when
>>> it comes to the bikeshedding phase, I'm sure there'll be some who say
>>> "if it can't be trashed, just hard delete it
Dear all,
I am writing a code using Python now.
I want to know how to find out values of all feasible x under constraints.
x = [x_1, x_2, x_3,..., x_10]
constraints:
x_i = 0,1,2,3 or 4, where i=1,2,10
x_1 + x_2 + x_3 +...+x_10 <= 15
How to find out all the feasible solutions x (d
"Steven D'Aprano" wrote in message
news:5553145b$0$9$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com...
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 17:27, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
A clean way to exit your script could be to raise an exception. It
should propagate to the toplevel and halt your script. However it is not
poss
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 8:14:39 PM UTC+5:30, zipher wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 10:35:29 PM UTC-5, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 8:00:50 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > Why can't a language be designed with a *practical and concrete* need in
> > > min
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On May 14, 2015 7:55 PM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>> (Though when
>> it comes to the bikeshedding phase, I'm sure there'll be some who say
>> "if it can't be trashed, just hard delete it", and others who say "if
>> it can't be trashed, raise an
On May 14, 2015 7:55 PM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
> (Though when
> it comes to the bikeshedding phase, I'm sure there'll be some who say
> "if it can't be trashed, just hard delete it", and others who say "if
> it can't be trashed, raise an exception". And neither is truly wrong.)
The answer is "r
On 5/14/2015 10:03 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The idea is that the library will hide that complexity from you, so your
python code will just say:
import shutil
shutil.move_to_trash(filename)
Since 'trash' is (or is used as) a verb, shutil.trash(filename)
seems sufficient.
and it will work o
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:59 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2015-05-14, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>>
>>> How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or
>
On Fri, 15 May 2015 03:32 am, Dave Farrance wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>
>>How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts
>>where a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
>>
>>Would you like
On Fri, 15 May 2015 04:06 am, Billy Earney wrote:
> Hello friends:
>
> I saw the following example at
>
http://nafiulis.me/potential-pythonic-pitfalls.html#using-mutable-default-arguments
> and
> did not believe the output produced and had to try it for myself
>
> def foo(a,b,c=[]):
> c.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:49 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> On 2015-05-14, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>>
>>> How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:49 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-14, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>
>> How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or
>> scripts where a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
On 14/05/2015 22:55, BartC wrote:
> def whiletest():
> i=0
> while i<=1:
> i=i+1
>
> whiletest()
>
Python 2.5 9.2 seconds
Python 3.1 13.1
Python 3.4.317.0
Python 3.4.314.3 (under Ubuntu on same machine, using the version
I buil
On 2015-05-14 22:55, BartC wrote:
On 14/05/2015 17:29, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
That's a shame because I wanted to tinker with the main dispatcher
loop to try and find out what exactly is making it slow. Nothing that
seems obvious at first sight.
My guess is the main culprit is attribut
On 14/05/2015 17:29, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
That's a shame because I wanted to tinker with the main dispatcher
loop to try and find out what exactly is making it slow. Nothing that
seems obvious at first sight.
My guess is the main culprit is attribute lookup in two ways:
* Each obj
On 14/05/2015 19:06, Billy Earney wrote:
Hello friends:
I saw the following example at
http://nafiulis.me/potential-pythonic-pitfalls.html#using-mutable-default-arguments
Thanks for this link, the title "Engineering Fantasy" could have been
made for the troll who's just arrived back here afte
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Billy Earney wrote:
> Hello friends:
>
> I saw the following example at
> http://nafiulis.me/potential-pythonic-pitfalls.html#using-mutable-default-arguments
> and did not believe the output produced and had to try it for myself
See also
https://docs.python.
On 05/14/2015 11:43 AM, Chris Warrick wrote:
And if you are looking for a mostly-compliant Python library/app (and
a shameless plug): https://pypi.python.org/pypi/trashman/1.5.0
The docs listed link to Package Builder. How is that related to TrashMan?
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/m
> I saw the following example at
> http://nafiulis.me/potential-pythonic-pitfalls.html#using-mutable-default-arguments
> and did not believe the output produced and had to try it for myself
Pylint (and perhaps other Python "linters") would, I think, warn you
that you were using a mutable objec
On 5/14/2015 1:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
2) make test - run the entire test suite. Takes just as long every
time, but most of it won't have changed.
The test runner has an option, -jn, to run tests in n processes instead
of just 1. On my 6 core pentium, -j5 cuts time to almost exactly 1/5
> > No, Common LISP does, but as the website says Common LISP is a
> > "multi-paradigm" langauge. It's trying to be everything to everybody,
> > just like Python tried to do in the other direction, making "everything an
> > object". Python was trying to be too pure, while LISP was trying to be
>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-14, Dave Farrance wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>>>I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>>
>>>How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts where
>>>a "Move file to trash"
On 05/14/2015 08:45 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts where
a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
Never.
Would you like to see that in the standard librar
On 2015-05-14, Dave Farrance wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>
>>How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts where
>>a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
>>
>>Would you like to see that in t
Hello friends:
I saw the following example at
http://nafiulis.me/potential-pythonic-pitfalls.html#using-mutable-default-arguments
and
did not believe the output produced and had to try it for myself
def foo(a,b,c=[]):
c.append(a)
c.append(b)
print(c)
foo(1,1)
foo(1,1)
foo(1,1)
p
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:32 AM, BartC wrote:
> OK, thanks. I didn't even know where the executable was put! Now I don't
> need 'make install', while 'make test' I won't bother with any more.
>
> Making a small change and typing 'make' took 5 seconds, which is reasonable
> enough (although I had t
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>
>How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts where
>a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
>
>Would you like to see that in the standard library, even if it meant that
>th
On 14/05/2015 18:11, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:02 AM, BartC wrote:
I hope there's a quicker way of re-building an executable after a minor
source file change, otherwise doing any sort of development is going to be
impractical.)
The whole point of 'make' is to rebuild o
On 2015-05-14 09:57, 20/20 Lab wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 06:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> I have a LARGE csv file that I need to process. 110+ columns,
>>> 72k rows. I managed to write enough to reduce it to a few
>>> hundred rows, and the five columns I'm interested in.
> I actually stumbled ac
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:02 AM, BartC wrote:
> Actually I had VirtualBox with Ubuntu, but I don't know my way around Linux
> and preferred doing things under Windows (and with all my own tools).
>
> But it's now building under Ubuntu.
>
> (Well, I'm not sure what it's doing exactly; the instructi
-
On Thu, May 14, 2015 3:35 PM CEST Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>On Wed, 13 May 2015 16:24:30 -0700, 20/20 Lab declaimed
>the following:
>
>>Now is were I have my problem:
>>
>>myList = [ [123, "XXX", "Item", "Qty", "Noise"],
>>[72976, "YYY", "Item", "Qty", "
On 05/14/2015 01:02 PM, BartC wrote:
On 14/05/2015 17:09, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:51 AM, BartC wrote:
OK, the answer seems to be No then - you can't just trivially compile
the C
modules that comprise the sources with the nearest compiler to hand.
So much
for C's famous
On 14/05/2015 17:09, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:51 AM, BartC wrote:
OK, the answer seems to be No then - you can't just trivially compile the C
modules that comprise the sources with the nearest compiler to hand. So much
for C's famous portability!
(Actually, I think you a
On 05/13/2015 06:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2015 09:24 am, 20/20 Lab wrote:
I'm a beginner to python. Reading here and there. Written a couple of
short and simple programs to make life easier around the office.
That being said, I'm not even sure what I need to ask for. I'
BartC :
> That's a shame because I wanted to tinker with the main dispatcher
> loop to try and find out what exactly is making it slow. Nothing that
> seems obvious at first sight.
My guess is the main culprit is attribute lookup in two ways:
* Each object attribute reference involves a diction
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:51 AM, BartC wrote:
> OK, the answer seems to be No then - you can't just trivially compile the C
> modules that comprise the sources with the nearest compiler to hand. So much
> for C's famous portability!
>
> (Actually, I think you already lost me on your first line.)
>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-14, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>>
>> How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or
>> scripts where a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
On 13/05/2015 23:34, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/13/2015 3:36 PM, BartC wrote:
I'm interested in playing with the CPython sources. I need to be able to
build under Windows, but don't want to use make files (which rarely work
properly), nor do a 6GB installation of Visual Studio Express which is
what
On 2015-05-14, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
>
> How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or
> scripts where a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
How would you even define what "move to trash" means in a sta
I'd like to do a little survey, and get a quick show of hands.
How many people have written GUI or text-based applications or scripts where
a "Move file to trash" function would be useful?
Would you like to see that in the standard library, even if it meant that
the library had feature-freeze and
43 matches
Mail list logo
