Op Thursday 30 Apr 2015 02:33 CEST schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:08 AM, siva sankari R
> wrote:
>> file=open("input","r")
>> line=file.seek(7)
>> print line
>>
>> The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none". I
>> don't know where the mistake is. Help.!
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
>> If you have a Java background, you might find this useful:
>>
>> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
>>
>> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/java-is-not-python-either.html
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't find
Steven D'Aprano :
> If you have a Java background, you might find this useful:
>
> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
>
> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/java-is-not-python-either.html
Unfortunately, I didn't find those articles all that insightful.
The one big difference betwee
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 21:24, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I am trying to make my modules also work under Python 3. I found that
> str is more precise in Python 3. The expression:
> str(134 / 6.0)
> gives in 2.7.8:
> '22.33'
> and in 3.4.1:
> '22.332'
The precise d
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 16:32, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> The convention is, if the caller messes with your private attributes
>> or variables, and their code breaks, they have nobody to blame but
>> themselves, and we are allowed to laugh at them. We're consenting
>> adults here.
>
> Coming fr
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> I have a small issue.
>
> Going to https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/, I see the python
> 2.7.9 download for x86 only. There is no 64-bit installer.
>
> Where can I get one?
>
> I'm on Win8.1 64-bit OS and prefer to work with 6
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> I have a small issue.
>
> Going to https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/, I see the python
> 2.7.9 download for x86 only. There is no 64-bit installer.
>
> Where can I get one?
>
> I'm on Win8.1 64-bit OS and prefer to work with
Hi, ALL,
I have a small issue.
Going to https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/, I see the python
2.7.9 download for x86 only. There is no 64-bit installer.
Where can I get one?
I'm on Win8.1 64-bit OS and prefer to work with 64-bit version...
Thank you.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On 04/29/2015 12:16 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Prefix those names with a single leading underscore, which is the
>> convention for private variables.
>
> Done.
>
>> This way, if some user (maybe you! ;) has a good reason to change
>> those values in can be done, but it is quite clear that said
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:57 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof
>> wrote:
>>> I was wondering if there is a way to do this:
>>> for del_index in range((sieve_len // skip_count) * skip_count
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Thursday 30 Apr 2015 00:38 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
>> In that case you can definitely omit the middle term of the slice,
>> which will be both more concise and clearer in intent, though
>> probably not significantly faster.
>
> It is cer
On 04/29/2015 10:16 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-04-28, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
If I remember correctly you can not hide variables of a class or make
them read-only?
I want to rewrite my moving average to python. The init is:
def __init__(self, length):
if type(length) != int:
Does anyone know of any current Python projects that utilize Google's search
engine to return quick answers to questions? For example, if you Google "When
did Abraham Lincoln die", Google returns "April 15, 1865" before listing any
results. I know of many projects that utilize Google search to r
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Ben Sizer wrote:
> 1) There clearly is a module named OMDBMap, and it's importable - it's there
> in the 2nd line of the traceback.
>
> Does anybody have any suggestions on how I can go about debugging this? Or
> refactoring it to avoid whatever is happening here
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:08 AM, siva sankari R wrote:
> file=open("input","r")
> line=file.seek(7)
> print line
>
> The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none". I don't know
> where the mistake is. Help.!
Going right back to the beginning... Are you aware that 'seek' works
w
Op Thursday 30 Apr 2015 00:38 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
>>> And although it's not clear to me what this is supposed to be
>>> doing, you probably no longer need the middle term if the
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:53 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> The only good top poster is a dead top poster, except for...
Since you just top posted, at least you're being honest.
Mark, I'm fairly sure you were trying to be funny, but I think you just
crossed a line from "funny and mean" to "just mean bu
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:57 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof
> wrote:
>> I was wondering if there is a way to do this:
>> for del_index in range((sieve_len // skip_count) * skip_count
>> - 1,
>> skip_c
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 1:42:18 PM UTC-7, Kashif Rana wrote:
> Hello Experts
>
> I have below lines with some variations.
>
> 1- set policy id 1000 from "Untrust" to "Trust" "Any" "1.1.1.1" "HTTP" nat
> dst ip 10.10.10.10 port 8000 permit log
>
> 2- set policy id 5000 from "Trust" to "U
On 2015-04-29 14:22, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 4/29/2015 1:49 PM, Kashif Rana wrote:
> > pol_elements =
> > re.compile('id\s(?P.+?)(?:\sname\s(?P.+?))?\sfrom\s(?P.+?)\sto\s(?P.+?)\s{2}(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:(?P\snat)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?P\sdip-id\s[^\s]+?)?)?\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:\sschedul
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> >> I was wondering if there is a way to do this:
> >> for del_index in range((sieve_len // skip_count) * skip_count - 1,
> >> skip_count - 2, -skip_count):
> >> del sieve[del_index]
> >> in a more efficient way.
> >
> > You can delete usin
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
>> And although it's not clear to me what this is supposed to be doing,
>> you probably no longer need the middle term if the intention is to
>> continue deleting all the way to the end
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 22:51 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
> On 29/04/2015 18:08, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 18:04 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
>>
From the amount of messages you could think I am a spammer. ;-)
>>>
>>> Did you mean spanner? ;-)
>>
>> My English is
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I was wondering if there is a way to do this:
>> for del_index in range((sieve_len // skip_count) * skip_count - 1,
>> skip_count - 2, -skip_count):
>> del sieve[del_index]
>> in a
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:03 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
>> I was judging from the look of your MovingAverage.
>>
>> I don't like the interface, it really should take an iterable so
>> that you can write
>>
> list(moving_average([1,2,3], 2))
>> [1.5, 2.5]
>
> I shoul
On 29/04/2015 22:22, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 4/29/2015 1:49 PM, Kashif Rana wrote:
pol_elements =
re.compile('id\s(?P.+?)(?:\sname\s(?P.+?))?\sfrom\s(?P.+?)\sto\s(?P.+?)\s{2}(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:(?P\snat)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?P\sdip-id\s[^\s]+?)?)?\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:\sschedule\s(?P[
On 2015-04-29 22:22, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 4/29/2015 1:49 PM, Kashif Rana wrote:
pol_elements =
re.compile('id\s(?P.+?)(?:\sname\s(?P.+?))?\sfrom\s(?P.+?)\sto\s(?P.+?)\s{2}(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:(?P\snat)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?P\sdip-id\s[^\s]+?)?)?\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:\sschedule\s(?P
On 4/29/2015 1:49 PM, Kashif Rana wrote:
pol_elements =
re.compile('id\s(?P.+?)(?:\sname\s(?P.+?))?\sfrom\s(?P.+?)\sto\s(?P.+?)\s{2}(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:(?P\snat)\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?P\sdip-id\s[^\s]+?)?)?\s(?P[^\s]+?)(?:\sschedule\s(?P[^\s]+?))?(?P\slog)?$'
)
... and that's why
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:03 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
>>> Realistically a Python coder with a little experience will have a
>>> glance at your code and run away.
>>
>> Oops, that is not nice to hear. :'-(
>
> Sorry, I did not mean to discourage you or insult you, I just wanted
> to make it cle
The only good top poster is a dead top poster, except for...
On 29/04/2015 19:42, Billy Earney wrote:
if your filename is input.cpp, you first line of code should be:
file=open("input*.cpp*","r")
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:26 PM, siva sankari R
wrote:
There is a file named "input.cpp"(c++ fi
On 29/04/2015 18:08, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 18:04 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
From the amount of messages you could think I am a spammer. ;-)
Did you mean spanner? ;-)
My English is not good enough to understand what you mean by this.
Seek, and ye shall find.
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 12:42:18 AM UTC+4, Kashif Rana wrote:
> Hello Experts
>
> I have below lines with some variations.
>
> 1- set policy id 1000 from "Untrust" to "Trust" "Any" "1.1.1.1" "HTTP" nat
> dst ip 10.10.10.10 port 8000 permit log
>
> 2- set policy id 5000 from "Trust" to "U
Hello Experts
I have below lines with some variations.
1- set policy id 1000 from "Untrust" to "Trust" "Any" "1.1.1.1" "HTTP" nat dst
ip 10.10.10.10 port 8000 permit log
2- set policy id 5000 from "Trust" to "Untrust" "Any" "microsoft.com" "HTTP"
nat src permit schedule "14August2014" log
3-
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I was wondering if there is a way to do this:
> for del_index in range((sieve_len // skip_count) * skip_count - 1,
> skip_count - 2, -skip_count):
> del sieve[del_index]
> in a
Python has a return object dependency on its input parameter call. I overlooked
the fact specifying a "chunksize" parameter in the read_csv function returns a
TextFileReader object, which is used for iteration purposes. I might need to
work with that, as well as a ref manual such as Python for D
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> I was judging from the look of your MovingAverage.
>
> I don't like the interface, it really should take an iterable so that you
> can write
>
list(moving_average([1,2,3], 2))
> [1.5, 2.5]
The problem with this is that m
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 18:27 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
>
>> Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>>> I have experience with Python, but it has been some time ago. The
>>> best way to relearn a language (for me) is just make a lot of code
>>> with it. But it would be nice if it was
In <8b2bd328-08a6-4211-85c4-8d117d1aa...@googlegroups.com> siva sankari R
writes:
> file=open("input","r")
> line=file.seek(7)
> print line
> The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none".
> I don't know where the mistake is. Help.!
The seek() function doesn't return any data
On 2015-04-29 19:08, siva sankari R wrote:
file=open("input","r")
line=file.seek(7)
print line
The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none". I don't know
where the mistake is. Help.!
'seek' will seek to position 7 in the file. It doesn't read. That's
what 'read' is for! :-)
I wrote a function lucky_numbers:
def lucky_numbers(n):
if n < 3:
return [1]
sieve = range(1, n + 1, 2)
sieve_index = 1
while True:
skip_count = sieve[sieve_index]
sieve_len = len(sieve)
if sieve_len < skip_count
if your filename is input.cpp, you first line of code should be:
file=open("input*.cpp*","r")
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:26 PM, siva sankari R
wrote:
> There is a file named "input.cpp"(c++ file) that contains some 80 lines of
> code.
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
There is a file named "input.cpp"(c++ file) that contains some 80 lines of
code.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:08 PM, siva sankari R wrote:
> file=open("input","r")
> line=file.seek(7)
> print line
>
> The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none". I don't know
> where the mistake is. Help.!
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What is in
On 2015.04.29 04:08, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 29/04/2015 09:29, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
>> following:
>> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
>>str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine s
file=open("input","r")
line=file.seek(7)
print line
The above code is supposed to print a line but it prints "none". I don't know
where the mistake is. Help.!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 18:27 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> I have experience with Python, but it has been some time ago. The
>> best way to relearn a language (for me) is just make a lot of code
>> with it. But it would be nice if it was useful at the same time. I
>> st
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 18:04 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
>> From the amount of messages you could think I am a spammer. ;-)
>>
>
> Did you mean spanner? ;-)
My English is not good enough to understand what you mean by this.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.link
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I have experience with Python, but it has been some time ago. The best
> way to relearn a language (for me) is just make a lot of code with it.
> But it would be nice if it was useful at the same time. I started a
> Python library on GitHub:
> https://github.com/CecilW
On 29/04/2015 15:40, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 15:14 CEST schreef Dave Angel:
On 04/29/2015 08:42 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I have the folowing print statements:
print(
'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize and'
'fibonacci_memoize once for {0} '.format(large_fibo
I'm saving some data via pickle, and loading it in is proving tricky.
Traceback (most recent call last):
[...some lines removed...]
File "/home/kylotan/OMDBSetup.py", line 44, in get_omdb_map
__omdb_map = OMDBMap.OMDBMap.load_from_binary(full_path)
File "/home/kylotan/OMDBMap.py", line 87, in
I have experience with Python, but it has been some time ago. The best
way to relearn a language (for me) is just make a lot of code with it.
But it would be nice if it was useful at the same time. I started a
Python library on GitHub:
https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/PythonLibrary
Anyone an
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 15:14 CEST schreef Dave Angel:
> On 04/29/2015 08:42 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I have the folowing print statements:
>> print(
>> 'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize and '
>> 'fibonacci_memoize once for {0} '.format(large_fibonacci))
>>
>>
>> print(
>> 'Calcu
On 2015-04-28, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> If I remember correctly you can not hide variables of a class or make
> them read-only?
>
> I want to rewrite my moving average to python. The init is:
> def __init__(self, length):
> if type(length) != int:
> raise ParameterError, 'P
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:29 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
> following:
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
That's perfectly fine,
On 04/29/2015 08:42 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I have the folowing print statements:
print(
'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize and '
'fibonacci_memoize once for {0} '.format(large_fibonacci))
print(
'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize an
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> In 2.7 that gives:
>('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for', 40, 'to determine
> speed increase')
>
> So I am going to use the one above it.
Start your script with:
from __future__ import print_function
Problem solv
I have the folowing print statements:
print(
'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize and '
'fibonacci_memoize once for {0} '.format(large_fibonacci))
print(
'Calculating fibonacci_old, fibonacci_memoize and '
'fibonacci_memoize once for {0} '.format(l
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 11:24 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
>> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
>> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
>
> You could write that as
>
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for '
> '{} to determine spe
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 13:55 CEST schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I am trying to make my modules also work under Python 3. I found
>> that str is more precise in Python 3. The expression: str(134 /
>> 6.0) gives in 2.7.8: '22.33' and
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 10:58 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
>> It is not only performance wise, I find the code without the try
>> also better looking. But that is very personally I suppose.
>>
>
> You might find this interesting
> http://www.jeffknupp.com/blog/2013/02/06/write-cleaner-python-use-e
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:57 pm, Φώντας Λαδοπρακόπουλος wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much Steven!
>>
>> Indeed it worked!!
>>
>> One last thing. Can you please explain to me inplain English what exactly
>> was that weird problem?
>
> Probably no
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I am trying to make my modules also work under Python 3. I found that
> str is more precise in Python 3. The expression:
> str(134 / 6.0)
> gives in 2.7.8:
> '22.33'
> and in 3.4.1:
> '22.332'
>
> Was not ver
On 29/04/2015 12:24, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I am trying to make my modules also work under Python 3. I found that
str is more precise in Python 3. The expression:
str(134 / 6.0)
gives in 2.7.8:
'22.33'
and in 3.4.1:
'22.332'
Was not very hard to solve:
if
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:57 pm, Φώντας Λαδοπρακόπουλος wrote:
> Thank you very much Steven!
>
> Indeed it worked!!
>
> One last thing. Can you please explain to me inplain English what exactly
> was that weird problem?
Probably not. I'm not a C expert and don't really understand in full detail
ho
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 11:24 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use
>> the following: print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize
>> once for ' + str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
>>
>>
I am trying to make my modules also work under Python 3. I found that
str is more precise in Python 3. The expression:
str(134 / 6.0)
gives in 2.7.8:
'22.33'
and in 3.4.1:
'22.332'
Was not very hard to solve:
if python_version == 3:
output06[5] = '22.333
On 27/04/2015 11:29, Colin McPhail wrote:
...
Is it possible to get core dumps on the Mac for debugging purposes? Would the
detached process inherit flags etc etc from the starting process? I know little
about OS X/Mach.
My first thought would be to run Applications -> Utilities ->
Dear Group,
I have a good amount of data in a remote location.
It is in MySql Database. I am trying to access it as,
>>> import pymysql
>>> import pymysql.cursors
...
...
with connection.cursor() as cursor:
# Read a single record
sql = "SELECT candidateid,cnd.First
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
> following:
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
>
> But I was told that using + with strings was bad
On Monday 27 April 2015 12:37, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
def multiply(n):
def deco(func):
def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
return newfunc
return deco
I'd like to be able to write that as
def multiply(n)(func)(*args, **kwargs):
return n
On 29/04/2015 09:29, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
following:
print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
But I was told that using + with stri
On 29/04/2015 05:05, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 12:52:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney
wrote:
It doesn't have to.
Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
following:
print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
But I was told that using + with strings was bad practice. Is this
true? If so, what
On 29/04/2015 09:04, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 09:02 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Monday 27 Apr 2015 22:35 CEST schreef Albert-Jan Roskam:
def some_func(arg, _memoize={}):
try:
return _memoize[arg]
except KeyError:
Hi All,
We are a group of researchers interested in knowing how Software Developers can
make best use of Social Media in their work. We would be very grateful if you
could help us in understanding on what kind of Twitter accounts you would like
to follow to help you with Software Development ac
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 09:02 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Monday 27 Apr 2015 22:35 CEST schreef Albert-Jan Roskam:
>>> def some_func(arg, _memoize={}):
>>> try:
>>> return _memoize[arg]
>>> except KeyError:
>>> result = some_expensive_
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Tuesday 28 Apr 2015 10:06 CEST schreef Chris Angelico:
>> (note that I'm avoiding the multiple-argument syntax which doesn't
>> work in Python 3;
>
> I already did this with print. Are there other statements I have to
> take care for the
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Op Monday 27 Apr 2015 22:35 CEST schreef Albert-Jan Roskam:
>> def some_func(arg, _memoize={}):
>> try:
>> return _memoize[arg]
>> except KeyError:
>> result = some_expensive_operation(arg)
>> _memoize[arg] = result
>> return result
>
> Th
Op Tuesday 28 Apr 2015 10:37 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
> On Tuesday 28 April 2015 17:33, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly you can not hide variables of a class or
>> make them read-only?
>
> In Python circles, the preferred terminology for class and instance
> members is "at
79 matches
Mail list logo
