Le dimanche 25 mai 2014 02:27:11 UTC+2, Terry Reedy a écrit :
> On 5/24/2014 3:49 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>
>
> > Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
>
> > Python 3 had something everybody wants and nothing else provides, the
>
> > people will come, even th
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, bookaa bookaa wrote:
> This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source to
> Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable binary.
> (btw: Go is a new C-like compilable language, open source).
>
Sounds like you're wr
Make Python Compilable
This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source to
Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable binary.
(btw: Go is a new C-like compilable language, open source).
Generally, people consider Python as a script language. It h
On 5/24/2014 3:49 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had something everybody wants and nothing else provides, the
people will come, even the legacy libraries will be ported then.
I cannot think of anything beyond the core tha
On 24/05/2014 23:47, Igor Korot wrote:
Mark,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/05/2014 23:12, Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, ALL,
I'm running Windows XP SP3 with python 2.7.
According to https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html all I need
is to download get-pip.py and
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Deb Wyatt wrote:
>
> Hello. I am a total python newbie and would like to ask questions but all my
> questions seem so stinkin' elementary compared to the posts I've read so far.
> Is there a beginning python list anywhere? I have searched and searched.
> Mea
Mark,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/05/2014 23:12, Igor Korot wrote:
>>
>> Hi, ALL,
>> I'm running Windows XP SP3 with python 2.7.
>>
>> According to https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html all I need
>> is to download get-pip.py and then run "python get-pip.
On 24/05/2014 23:12, Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, ALL,
I'm running Windows XP SP3 with python 2.7.
According to https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html all I need
is to download get-pip.py and then run "python get-pip.py".
However, after that running pip does not do anything. It says "pip is
not
On 25.05.2014 00:14, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2014-05-24 23:05, Luis José Novoa wrote:
Hi All,
Hope you're doing great. One quick question. I am defining an array of
sets using numpy as:
a=array([set([])]*3)
Has nothing to do with numpy, but the problem is exclusively with your
innermost expr
On 2014-05-24 23:05, Luis José Novoa wrote:
Hi All,
Hope you're doing great. One quick question. I am defining an array of sets
using numpy as:
a=array([set([])]*3)
Now, if I want to add an element to the set in, lets say, a[0], and I use the
.add(4) operation, which results in:
array([set(
Hi, ALL,
I'm running Windows XP SP3 with python 2.7.
According to https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html all I need
is to download get-pip.py and then run "python get-pip.py".
However, after that running pip does not do anything. It says "pip is
not recognized as an internal command".
My
Hi All,
Hope you're doing great. One quick question. I am defining an array of sets
using numpy as:
a=array([set([])]*3)
Now, if I want to add an element to the set in, lets say, a[0], and I use the
.add(4) operation, which results in:
array([set([4]), set([4]), set([4])], dtype=object)
whi
On 24/05/2014 20:51, Deb Wyatt wrote:
Hello. I am a total python newbie and would like to ask questions but
all my questions seem so stinkin' elementary compared to the posts I've
read so far. Is there a beginning python list anywhere? I have
searched and searched. Meanwhile I will continue t
Hello. I am a total python newbie and would like to ask questions but all my questions seem so stinkin' elementary compared to the posts I've read so far. Is there a beginning python list anywhere? I have searched and searched. Meanwhile I will continue to read the messages here to cram as
On 24/05/2014 20:49, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Devin Jeanpierre :
If you want to migrate to Python 3, help that library forward, rather
than trying to make some bespoke replacement you think will be a
killer app.
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had so
Devin Jeanpierre :
> If you want to migrate to Python 3, help that library forward, rather
> than trying to make some bespoke replacement you think will be a
> killer app.
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had something everybody wants and nothing else
Devin Jeanpierre, 24.05.2014 18:03:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> blindanagram:
>> Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
>> there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
>> killer module/application/library that is
On 05/24/2014 09:03 AM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
killer module/application/library that is only ava
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 24, 2014, at 7:35, blindanagram wrote:
>
>> On 24/05/2014 08:13, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
>>> An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
>>>
>>> http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> blindanagram :
> Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
> there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
> killer module/application/library that is only available on Python3.
>
> Asyncio
> # CODE #
> PyModuleDef moduledef = { PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL,
> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL };
>
> moduledef.m_name = "MyModule";
> moduledef.m_doc = "MyModule";
> pModule = PyModule_Create( &moduledef );
> PyState_AddModule( pModule, &moduledef );
>
> PyRun_SimpleString( "print( gl
On 2014-05-24, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Python 3 will never work.
Neither will color TV.
All that phase detection stuff and that shadow-mask thing?
And airplanes? Bah!
Completely ridiculous.
--
Grant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 3:29:01 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>
>
> Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
> there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
> killer module/application/library that is only available on Python3.
>
I t
blindanagram :
>> Quote:
>> """ And with Python 3.4 I really have not heard anyone complain that
>> they wouldn't like to use Python 3 instead of Python 2. """
>>
>> Or the devs do not wish to listen.
>>
>> Python 3 will never work.
>
> It works for me.
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy li
On 2014-05-24 07:46, Charles Gagnon wrote:
We were happily using PiCloud for several long calculations and we very happy
with with it. With their realtime cores, we could take really large
calculations set and run through fairly quickly.
Now that PiCloud is going away, we ran a few tests on Mu
On 24/05/2014 08:13, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
>> An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
>>
>> http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/my-view-on-the-current-state-of-python-3
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> My fellow Pytho
Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
> An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
>
> http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/my-view-on-the-current-state-of-python-3
>
>
>
> --
>
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
27 matches
Mail list logo
