eschneide...@comcast.net wrote:
> I'm on chapter 9 of this guide to python:
> http://inventwithpython.com/chapter9.html but I don't quite understand
> why line 79 is what it is (blanks = blanks[:i] + secretWord[i] +
> blanks[i+1:]). I particularly don't get the [i+1:] part. Any additional
eschneide...@comcast.net wrote:
> I'm on chapter 9 of this guide to python:
> http://inventwithpython.com/chapter9.html but I don't quite understand
> why line 79 is what it is (blanks = blanks[:i] + secretWord[i] +
> blanks[i+1:]). I particularly don't get the [i+1:] part. Any additional
> i
On 5 August 2013 06:11, wrote:
> I'm on chapter 9 of this guide to python:
> http://inventwithpython.com/chapter9.html but I don't quite
> understand why line 79 is what it is (blanks = blanks[:i] + secretWord[i] +
> blanks[i+1:]). I particularly don't get the [i+1:] part. Any additional
> i
I'm on chapter 9 of this guide to python:
http://inventwithpython.com/chapter9.html but I don't quite understand why
line 79 is what it is (blanks = blanks[:i] + secretWord[i] + blanks[i+1:]). I
particularly don't get the [i+1:] part. Any additional information and help
would be greatly ap
On 5 August 2013 03:05, Francois Lafont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Up. ;-)
>
> Le 04/08/2013 04:10, Francois Lafont a écrit :
>
> > Is it possible with argparse to have this syntax for a script?
> >
> > my-script (-a -b VALUE-B | -c -d VALUE-D)
> >
> > I would like to do this with the argparse module.
>
Hello,
Up. ;-)
Le 04/08/2013 04:10, Francois Lafont a écrit :
> Is it possible with argparse to have this syntax for a script?
>
> my-script (-a -b VALUE-B | -c -d VALUE-D)
>
> I would like to do this with the argparse module.
>
> Thanks in advance.
I have found this post:
https://groups.goo
On 2013/8/5 2:20, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote:
Le 04/08/2013 18:06, Jacknaruto a écrit :
Hi, Guys!
I created a thread class based QThread, and defined some signals to
update UI through main thread.
the UI used a stackedWidget,someone page named 'progressPage' have a
progressBar and a Label, t
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 03:46 AM, cool1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I do know some Python programming, I just dont know enough to put
> > together the various scripts I need...I would really really
> > appreciate if some one can help me with that...
>
Hi
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Markus Rother wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following behaviour seen in 3.2 seems very strange to me:
>
> As expected:
() == []
> False
>
> However:
().__eq__([])
> NotImplemented
[].__eq__(())
> NotImplemented
You don't normally want to be calling dunder
On 04/08/2013 23:35, Markus Rother wrote:
Hello,
The following behaviour seen in 3.2 seems very strange to me:
As expected:
>>> () == []
False
However:
>>> ().__eq__([])
NotImplemented
>>> [].__eq__(())
NotImplemented
And:
>>> bool(NotImplemented)
True
Hence:
>>> bool(().__eq__([])
On 08/02/2013 03:46 AM, cool1...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do know some Python programming, I just dont know enough to put
> together the various scripts I need...I would really really
> appreciate if some one can help me with that...
Seems like your first task, then, is to become proficient at python
Hello,
The following behaviour seen in 3.2 seems very strange to me:
As expected:
>>> () == []
False
However:
>>> ().__eq__([])
NotImplemented
>>> [].__eq__(())
NotImplemented
And:
>>> bool(NotImplemented)
True
Hence:
>>> bool(().__eq__([]))
True
>>> ( () == [] ) != ( ().__eq__([]) )
True
Ho
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:21 PM, JohnD wrote:
> On 2013-08-04, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> Thank you very much. The dust is slowly starting to move.
> The code posted is nothing like the real thing, but I tried
> to capture the essence.
>
> From your commants I think I see my mistake.
>
> Than
On 2013-08-04, Chris Angelico wrote:
[...]
Thank you very much. The dust is slowly starting to move.
The code posted is nothing like the real thing, but I tried
to capture the essence.
>From your commants I think I see my mistake.
Thank you very much for your reply!
--
http://mail.python.org/m
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 7:20 PM, JohnD wrote:
> #~/usr/bin/python
If this is meant to be a Unix-style shebang, the second character
needs to be ! not ~. This has no effect on Python though.
> import random
> class boys:
> state={}
> class boy:
> state={
> 'name':'',
> 'age
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> @ Terry Jan Reedy
>
> If there is an issue in place for improving the lambda forms then that's
> good. I wanted a link about functional programming because it is mentioned as
> if it were a household word.
It depends on your household I sup
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> programmers, like engineers, have to deal with the
>> possibility (or certainty) of idiots using their products.
>
> As a programmer, I'm OK with the idea that idiots are using my programs.
> What bother
After 5 year of no Python programming I decided that I needed to brush
up my skills. Started writing on a reasonably complicated problem.
Unfortunately my basic Python skill are gone.
I present the bare-bore problem. This code does not produce the expected
result: can anyone tell me why? As you wi
Le 04/08/2013 18:06, Jacknaruto a écrit :
Hi, Guys!
I created a thread class based QThread, and defined some signals to
update UI through main thread.
the UI used a stackedWidget,someone page named 'progressPage' have a
progressBar and a Label, the next page named 'resultsPage' shows
result
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> programmers, like engineers, have to deal with the
> possibility (or certainty) of idiots using their products.
As a programmer, I'm OK with the idea that idiots are using my programs.
What bothers me more is when, as a user of a program, I have to deal
w
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I have always found, computer scientists are funny scientists.
>
> I have always found that sciences which contain the word "science" in
> their name tend to not be very scientific.
>
> Biology, Chem
@ Terry Jan Reedy
If there is an issue in place for improving the lambda forms then that's good.
I wanted a link about functional programming because it is mentioned as if it
were a household word.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:57 PM, wrote:
> I understand I did not ask the question correctly, but is there any chance
> you can help me put together this code? I know that you all do this for fun
> and enjoy it and that is why I asked you guys instead of asking some one who
> will charge me for
>Oh hai - as I was reading the documentation, look what I found:
>
>http://docs.python.org/2/library/logging.html#filter
>
>Methinks that should do exactly what you want.
Hi Wayne,
I was too hasty when I looked at filters as I didn't think they could do
what I wanted. Turns out a logging object se
Hi, Guys!
I created a thread class based QThread, and defined some signals to update UI
through main thread.
the UI used a stackedWidget,someone page named 'progressPage' have a
progressBar and a Label, the next page named 'resultsPage' shows results(some
Labels).
When the window showed progress
I understand I did not ask the question correctly, but is there any chance you
can help me put together this code? I know that you all do this for fun and
enjoy it and that is why I asked you guys instead of asking some one who will
charge me for a very simple line of code.
I would appreciate it
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:57:32 AM Aseem Bansal wrote:
> I was writing a Python script for getting the user stats of a
> website(Specifically codereview.stackexchange). I wanted to store the
stats
> in a database. I found Python3's sqlite3 library. I found that I needed sql
> commands for us
In article <07f6b1c7-069d-458b-a9fe-ff30c09f2...@googlegroups.com>,
matt.doolittl...@gmail.com wrote:
> self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(time(
> [...]
> 1375588774.89
> [...]
> Why is it only giving me the centisecond precision? the docs say i should
> get microsecond precision
When citing d
You basically have, currently, widgets,data,data manipulation through
variables and widget utilization to call the functions,and data
visualization.
Next step would be algorithm, and pseudo code, plus a prototyped mockup of
the GUI.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What about Earth Science? But in this case, it is indeed science,
because in its name the word science is applied to the object of its
study. But in the case of "computer science", the word science is
applied to the word which describes the tool this "science" uses!! It's
like it was Telescope Scie
Let's say computer science isn't science.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article ,
wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have always found, computer scientists are funny scientists.
I have always found that sciences which contain the word "science" in
their name tend to not be very scientific.
Biology, Chemistry, Physics, those are real sciences. Computer Science,
So
matt.doolittl...@gmail.com wrote:
> ok so now i import the module like this:
>
>from time import strftime, time
>
> i made the write statement like this:
>
>self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(strftime("%Y-%m-%d",
>self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(strftime("%H:%M:%S",
>self.logf
This statement might be more true than you realize.
I can't speak for the tools Blue Sky uses for their films, but when the
studio I worked at created the "Minion Mayem" ride for Universal Orlando we
used a number of tools that relied heavily on Python for everything from
character rigging to rend
matt.doolittl...@gmail.com writes:
>self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(time(
[...]
> 2013-08-0323:59:341375588774.89
[...]
> Why is it only giving me the centisecond precision? the docs say i
> should get microsecond precision with the code i put together.
Because of str()'s defau
ok so now i import the module like this:
from time import strftime, time
i made the write statement like this:
self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(strftime("%Y-%m-%d",
self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(strftime("%H:%M:%S",
self.logfile.write('%s\t'%(str(time(
(oh and btw,i kno
Le samedi 3 août 2013 13:35:29 UTC+2, Nicholas a écrit :
> On Friday, 2 August 2013, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
> So, what are you feasting for? Nothing?
>
>
> I have long since ceased to be amazed at the number of people who would like
> their personal and arbitra
37 matches
Mail list logo
