> I'm looking to search an entire XML file for specific text and replace that
> text, while maintaining the structure of the XML file. The text occurs within
> multiple nodes throughout the file.
> I basically need to replace every occurrence C:\Program Files with C:\Program
> Files (x86), regar
I'm looking to search an entire XML file for specific text and replace that
text, while maintaining the structure of the XML file. The text occurs within
multiple nodes throughout the file.
I basically need to replace every occurrence C:\Program Files with C:\Program
Files (x86), regardless of l
Having a conference during the summer is generally more expensive,
because you have to compete with tourists for lodging and such. For
this reason, summer-time conventions are often in places where nobody
wants to be during the summer, like Phoenix.
That said, Santa Clara probably isn't a cheap l
Yes basically looks like you get it.
I have to further test it but my first impression is that it's correct.
So actually the point was to use nargs="?".
Thank you very much.
Ben
Le Jul 27, 2012 à 5:44 PM, Peter Otten a écrit :
> Benoist Laurent wrote:
>
>> I'm impletting a tool in Python.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> It may be a bit awkward having to type "-i" once per file in the
> command line, but it does clear up the ambiguity.
Or you could bite the bullet and make the input files argument part of
the subparser, which you may find ugly, but I believe it
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Benoist Laurent wrote:
> That's the solution I came to.
> But I'm not very happy with this since I can definitively not make my
> program act as a standard unix tool.
> Any other solution?
I don't understand; that's pretty much the same way that standard unix
tool
Benoist Laurent wrote:
> I'm impletting a tool in Python.
> I'd like this tool to behave like a standard unix tool, as grep for
> exemple. I chose to use the argparse module to parse the command line and
> I think I'm getting into several limitations of this module.
>
>> First Question.
> How can
Le Jul 27, 2012 à 4:43 PM, Oscar Benjamin a écrit :
>
>
> On 27 July 2012 15:26, Benoist Laurent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm impletting a tool in Python.
> I'd like this tool to behave like a standard unix tool, as grep for exemple.
> I chose to use the argparse module to parse the command line and
In article ,
Roy Smith wrote:
> Lastly, nose, by default, doesn't say much. When things go wrong and
> you have no clue what's happening, --verbose and --debug are your
> friends.
I found another example of nose not saying much, and this one is kind of
annoying. Unittest has much richer as
Hey guys,
I recently saw a post saying that PyCon for students' price was
dropped to $100. If you are trying to attract students, why not move
PyCon to take place during the summer? As far as I know, summer vs
spring makes no difference to any members of the general working
population (except for
On 27 July 2012 15:26, Benoist Laurent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm impletting a tool in Python.
> I'd like this tool to behave like a standard unix tool, as grep for
> exemple.
> I chose to use the argparse module to parse the command line and I think
> I'm getting into several limitations of this modul
Hi,
I'm impletting a tool in Python.
I'd like this tool to behave like a standard unix tool, as grep for exemple.
I chose to use the argparse module to parse the command line and I think I'm
getting into several limitations of this module.
> First Question.
How can I configure the the ArgumentPa
Hi Steven,
Sorry for inconvenients.
I've posted "unsyntax" example just typing from here, just for exaplain my
problem
Finally, I don't understand why every set_ set value on wrong section/key.
I think setattr syntax is correct, but it doesn't works!
About java/python concept, yeah! You all ri
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:49:45 -0700, Mariano Di Felice wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a property file (.ini) that has multiple sections and relative
> keys, as default structure.
Have you looked at Python's standard INI file library?
http://docs.python.org/library/configparser.html
> Now, I would li
Hi,
I have a property file (.ini) that has multiple sections and relative keys,
as default structure.
Now, I would like to export from my utility class methods getter and setter.
I have started as is:
class Utility:
keys = {"STANDUP": ["st_key1", "st_key2", "st_key3", "st_key4"],
Simon Cropper wrote:
On 27/07/12 05:31, Ethan Furman wrote:
A few more bug fixes, and I actually included the documentation this
time. :) It can be found at http://python.org/pypi/dbf, and has been
tested on CPythons 2.4 - 2.7, and PyPy 1.8.
[snip]
Ethan,
That's great.
Can you comment on
2012/7/25 andrea crotti :
>
> I would also like to avoid this in general, but we have many
> subprocesses to launch and some of them might take weeks, so we need
> to have a process which is always running, because there is never a
> point in time where we can just say let's stop everything and sta
andrea crotti wrote:
> I have some complex input to parse (with regexps), and I would like to
> create nice objects directy from them.
> The re module doesn't of course try to conver to any type, so I was
> playing around to see if it's worth do something as below, where I
> assign a constructor t
> With 16 ** 10 possible digests, the probability of collision hits 50%
at 1234605 tables
Actually, I'm using base64 encoding. So it is 64**10. I guess using 6
characters will enough.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have some complex input to parse (with regexps), and I would like to
create nice objects directy from them.
The re module doesn't of course try to conver to any type, so I was
playing around to see if it's worth do something as below, where I
assign a constructor to every regexp and build an obje
Unless an attacker can select the field names, in which case they may be
able to improve those odds significantly. In the case of MD5, they can
possibly improve those odds to 1 in 1, since MD5 is vulnerable to
collision attacks. Not so for some (all?) of the SHA hashes, at least not
yet, but the
As a side note, the odds of having at least one hash collision among
multiple tables are known as the birthday problem. At 4 hex digits
there are 65536 possible digests, and it turns out that at 302 tables
there is a >50% chance that at least one pair of those names have the
same 4-digit digest
Am 26.07.2012 09:50, schrieb Mark Lawrence:
And if we could persuade the BDFL to introduce braces, we could have {()
and }()
What do you mean "persuade"? Braces work perfectly:
def foo():
{}
Uli
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alan Franzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> I think I'm missing some piece here.
>
> I'm trying to register a default error handler for handling exceptions
> for preventing encoding/decoding errors (I know how this works and that
> making this global is probably not a good practice, but I found this
> strang
24 matches
Mail list logo
