On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
> It's a rare occurrence, but sometimes my script will terminate and I get
> this:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\path\to\script\script.py", line 992, in
Do you call on potentially-buggy external modules? I'd be curious to
se
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:15:30 -0500, inq1ltd wrote:
> Check your code in that module for open parenthesis something like
> below.. Most likely your code is looking for the closing parenthesis.
> Start at the bottom and move up.
>
> pink = str(self.RecordKey[2] <--missing ")"
If that were the
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
>
> In Python textbooks that I have read, it is usually not mentioned that
> we can very easily program Common LISP-style closures with Python. It
> is done as follows:
>
> -
>
> # Make a Common LISP-like
Check your code in that module for open parenthesis something like below..
Most likely your code is looking for the closing parenthesis.
Start at the bottom and move up.
pink = str(self.RecordKey[2] <--missing ")"
jimonlinux
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:57 -0600, Andrew Berg wrote:
> >
In Python textbooks that I have read, it is usually not mentioned that
we can very easily program Common LISP-style closures with Python. It
is done as follows:
-
# Make a Common LISP-like closure with Python.
#
# Antti J Ylikoski 02-03-2012.
def f1():
John Nagle writes:
> QNX's message passing looks more like a subroutine call than an
> I/O operation,
How do they enforce process isolation, or do they decide they don't need to?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:57 -0600, Andrew Berg wrote:
> It's a rare occurrence, but sometimes my script will terminate and I get
> this:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\path\to\script\script.py", line 992, in
>
> That's it. And the line number is always the last line of the
在 2012年1月14日星期六UTC+8上午6时48分29秒，Evan Driscoll写道：
> On 01/13/2012 03:20 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> > They perform the same action, but their semantics are different.
> > operator+ will always return a new object, thanks to its
> > signature, and operator+= shall never do so. That's the main
> > differ
Paul Rubin wrote:
> > Both cdecimal and libmpdec have an extremely conservative release policy.
> > When new features are added, the complete test suite is run both with and
> > without Valgrind on many different platforms. With the added tests against
> > decNumber, this takes around 8 months on
Thanks guys that was fast:
I used
for line in users:
fob.write(line + "\n")
fob.close()
and that works
Excuse me for the stupid questions, but since one week I read alot of
python and I`m confused :p
the only program language I knew in the time was Pascal, but i forgot all
of it
cheers
On 02/03/2012 03:27 PM, Anatoli Hristov wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m totaly new in python and trying to figure out - how to write a list to
a file with a newline at the end of each object.
I tried alot of combinations :) like:
users = ['toli','didi']
fob=open('c:/Python27/Toli/username','w')
fob.writ
Anatoli Hristov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I`m totaly new in python and trying to figure out - how to write a list to a
> file with a newline at the end of each object.
> I tried alot of combinations :) like:
> users = ['toli','didi']
> fob=open('c:/Python27/Toli/username','w')
> fob.writelines(
Hi,
You have to iterate.
Either with
for u in users:
fob.write( u + '\n' )
or with a lambda function.
always a good call: http://python.org/
greets,
M.
On 02/03/2012 09:27 PM, Anatoli Hristov wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m totaly new in python and trying to figure out - how to write a
list t
Hi everyone,
I`m totaly new in python and trying to figure out - how to write a list to
a file with a newline at the end of each object.
I tried alot of combinations :) like:
users = ['toli','didi']
fob=open('c:/Python27/Toli/username','w')
fob.writelines(users) + '%s\N'
fob.close()
or fob.writel
It's a rare occurrence, but sometimes my script will terminate and I get
this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\path\to\script\script.py", line 992, in
That's it. And the line number is always the last line of the file
(which in my case is a blank line). I have not seen this on Linu
On 02/03/2012 09:14 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Debashish Saha wrote:
would u like to help me by answering some vbasic questions about python?
You might prefer to ask such questions on the tutor mailing list instead:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
C
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Debashish Saha wrote:
> would u like to help me by answering some vbasic questions about python?
You might prefer to ask such questions on the tutor mailing list instead:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailm
would u like to help me by answering some vbasic questions about python?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm getting linker errors when trying to install PyCrypto on Windows:
C:\libraries\MinGW\bin\gcc.exe -mno-cygwin -shared -s
build\temp.win-amd64-2.7\Release\src\winrand.o
build\temp.win-amd64-2.7\Release\src\winrandom.def -LC:\Python27\libs
-LC:\Python27\PCbuild\amd64 -lws2_32 -ladvapi32 -lpython2
2012/2/3 Dennis Lee Bieber :
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:19:22 -0700, Ian Kelly
>
>
> I spent nearly 20 years having to maintain the /output/ of such a
> translator.
>
Yes I think that is the point, if the code you maintain and the code
which you have to debug differ because there is a
Yes, exactly like range
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/Demo/classes/Range.py.html
see handleargs function. Well that's short, but that's still too much code
for what I want to do ;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 8:09 PM, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote:
>
>> Hell
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Perhaps lists shouldn't define += at all, but then people will
> complain that mylist += another_list is slow. Telling them to use
> mylist.extend instead just makes them cranky. After all, mylist +
> another_list works, so why shouldn't += work?
It would work, it
>> Mm I don't think it's what the OP is asking (unless I misunderstood...).
>> I think he wants to compile some syntax TO Python.
>> But I don't really see why you would something like this (if not for fun).
>
> Maybe because you think that Python syntax could be improved upon --
> for instance, Py
On 3.2.2012 02:19, Ian Kelly wrote:
Then how are you going to maintain the code? Maintain the compiled
code or the source?
As with all compiled software, you maintain the input, not the output.
I don't think that's what was the question. CoffeeScript is a hopeless
hack in the hopeless situat
On 03 Feb 2012 05:04:39 GMT
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:08:06 +1100, John O'Hagan wrote:
>
> > I think we're 12 years late on this one. It's PEP 203 from 2000 and
> > the key phrase was:
> >
> > "The in-place function should always return a new reference, either
> > to the o
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:14:33 -0800, John Nagle wrote:
> I won't even get into the appalling mess around the Global Interpreter
> Lock.
You know full well that IronPython and Jython don't have a GIL. If the
GIL was as harmful as you repeatedly tell us, why haven't you, and
everyone else, migrate
On 02/03/2012 06:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ultimately, there is no right answer, because the multitude of
requirements are contradictory. No matter what Python did, somebody would
complain.
Which makes me wonder why it was introduced at all, or at least so fast
If you see the difference in s
On 1/31/2012 8:04 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
({muse: who do we have to kill
to persuade OS designers to incorporate something like the Amiga ARexx
"rexxport" system}).
QNX, which is a real-time microkernel which looks like POSIX to
applications. actually got interprocess communication rig
28 matches
Mail list logo
