Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On 11/18/2011 9:03 PM, W. eWatson wrote: ... 3.3.2? I do not see that in his single message I found. I see a 3.2.2 release on . Google shows me nothing for 3.3.2. I see: * Windows x86 MSI Installer (3.2.2) (sig) and Visual Studio debug informatio

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

... 3.3.2? I do not see that in his single message I found. I see a 3.2.2 release on . Google shows me nothing for 3.3.2. I see: * Windows x86 MSI Installer (3.2.2) (sig) and Visual Studio debug information files (sig) * Windows X86-64 MSI Install

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:31:03 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: > Somehow 3.3.2 doesn't look like 2.7.2. Oops, so you're right. Sorry for the noise. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Data Plotting Library Dislin 10.2

On 18 Nov, 22:16, Tony the Tiger wrote: > Ya, but apparently no source unless you dig deep into your pockets. > Really, why would we need this when we already have gnuplot? > Just wondering... Dislin is a very nice plotting library for scientific data, particularly for scientists and engineers u

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

On Nov 18, 10:55 am, MRAB wrote: > On 18/11/2011 15:48, Junfeng Hu wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks > > Yes, I had tried this before, so you could find that I comment the line > > sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) > > Here is the results. > > D:\Python test>mythread2.py > > Tra

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On 19/11/2011 00:50, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 4:31 PM, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 3:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:06:47 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7. One thing I

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On 11/18/2011 4:31 PM, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 3:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:06:47 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7. One thing I think no one has offered is whether the

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On 11/18/2011 3:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:06:47 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7. One thing I think no one has offered is whether their installation of 2.7.2 has the same IDLE

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:06:47 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: > Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 > flop the same way under Win 7. > > One thing I think no one has offered is whether their installation of > 2.7.2 has the same IDLE oddity that I've described. That is,

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/17/11 8:34 PM, W. eWatson wrote: > On 11/17/2011 7:04 PM, alex23 wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2:55 am, "W. eWatson" wrote: >>> Comments? >> >> Are you using the vanilla installer or ActiveState's ActivePython? I >> find the latter integrates better with Windows. >> >> Also, out of curiousity, 32 or

Resources consumed by parent

How do I get the resources consumed by the parent process? getrusage() in the resource module seems to work only for self or the children processes. thanks, --mihai -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

On 11/18/2011 10:06 AM, W. eWatson wrote: Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7. One thing I think no one has offered is whether their installation of 2.7.2 has the same IDLE oddity that I've described. That is, if you right-click on

Python 2.7.2 on Win7 and IDLE (Try it)

Undoubtedly some of you have seen my post Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7. One thing I think no one has offered is whether their installation of 2.7.2 has the same IDLE oddity that I've described. That is, if you right-click on a py file, do you see a choice for the

Re: Dynamically Generate Methods

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, GZ wrote: > Hi, > > I have a class Record and a list key_attrs that specifies the names of > all attributes that correspond to a primary key. > > I can write a function like this to get the primary key: > > def get_key(instance_of_record): > return tuple(instance

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/17/2011 9:25 PM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:21 PM, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 7:59 PM, Dave Angel wrote: On 11/17/2011 03:31 PM, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 9:39 AM, John Gordon wrote: Can you add IDLE manually to the associated applications list?

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/17/2011 11:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: On 11/17/2011 7:03 PM, W. eWatson wrote: I have not found any successful way to get to IDLE. Use the start menu to start IDLE once. Then pin it to your taskbar. If you do not have STart/ all programs / Python / IDLE, then your installation is bad. A

Re: Dynamically Generate Methods

GZ wrote: > For example, if key_attrs=['A','B'], I want the generated function to > be equivalent to the following: > > def get_key(instance_of_record): >return (instance_of_record['A'],instance_of_record['B'] ) > > I realize I can use eval or exec to do this. But is there any other > way t

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/18/2011 9:19 AM, rusi wrote: On Nov 18, 10:12 pm, MRAB wrote: On 18/11/2011 15:29, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 5:11 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote:

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/18/2011 9:12 AM, MRAB wrote: On 18/11/2011 15:29, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 5:11 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: I have not found any successful way to ge

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On Nov 18, 10:12 pm, MRAB wrote: > On 18/11/2011 15:29, W. eWatson wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11/18/2011 5:11 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: > >> On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: > >>> On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: > > > I

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 18/11/2011 15:29, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/18/2011 5:11 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: I have not found any successful way to get to IDLE. It's on on the right-clic

Re: Dynamically Generate Methods

GZ wrote: Hi, I have a class Record and a list key_attrs that specifies the names of all attributes that correspond to a primary key. I can write a function like this to get the primary key: def get_key(instance_of_record): return tuple(instance_of_record.__dict__[k] for k in key_attrs) Ho

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

On 18/11/2011 15:48, Junfeng Hu wrote: Thanks Yes, I had tried this before, so you could find that I comment the line sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) Here is the results. D:\Python test>mythread2.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "C:\P

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Junfeng Hu wrote: > Hi Chris. > The socket only binded once. That's the problem I'm puzzleing, I think it may > a bug of multiprocessing in windows, or something I missed. I don't know how multiprocessing goes about initializing those subprocesses; I suspect that

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

Hi Chris. The socket only binded once. That's the problem I'm puzzleing, I think it may a bug of multiprocessing in windows, or something I missed. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Junfeng Hu wrote: > And actually ,the socket hadn't been used in this script. Doesn't matter that you haven't used it; you're binding to the port, that's what causes the 10048. I think the main problem is that you're trying to share sockets across processes, but

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/17/2011 8:34 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:36 -0800, "W. eWatson" declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: Months ago 2.5.2 stopped functioning on my Win7 PC, so a few days ago I uninstalled and installed. Same problem. If one right-clicks on a py f

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/17/2011 8:34 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:36 -0800, "W. eWatson" declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: Months ago 2.5.2 stopped functioning on my Win7 PC, so a few days ago I uninstalled and installed. Same problem. If one right-clicks on a py f

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

And actually ,the socket hadn't been used in this script. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

Thanks Yes, I had tried this before, so you could find that I comment the line sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) Here is the results. D:\Python test>mythread2.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py",

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 11/18/2011 5:11 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: I have not found any successful way to get to IDLE. It's on on the right-click of a py menu, and, if I go the ...lib

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Junfeng Hu wrote: > Hi All, I'm trying to leverage my core i5 to send more UDP packets with > multiprocssing, but I found a interesting thing is that the socket.bind is > always reporting 10048 error even the process didn't do anything about the > socket. > sock

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

I did a test on linux, it works well, so the issue is related to os. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Dynamically Generate Methods

Hi, I have a class Record and a list key_attrs that specifies the names of all attributes that correspond to a primary key. I can write a function like this to get the primary key: def get_key(instance_of_record): return tuple(instance_of_record.__dict__[k] for k in key_attrs) However, since

Re: Passing DLL handle as an argument (in Windows)

Am 18.11.2011 12:49, schrieb Pekka Kytölä: What I'd like to do is that after fetching those SDK function pointers I'd like to fire up .py/.pyc that snoops for possible plugins written in python and registers those plugins and callbacks and let them react to events. Obviously this python code need

Re: Both Python 2.5.2 and 2.7.2 flop the same way under Win 7

On 2011-11-18, W. eWatson wrote: > On 11/17/2011 4:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:03:14 -0800, W. eWatson wrote: >> >>> I have not found any successful way to get to IDLE. It's on on the >>> right-click of a py menu, and, if I go the ...lib/idle.pyw, it fails >>> with a "i

Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be?

On 18/11/2011 04:34, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:18:11 -0800 (PST), John Ladasky declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: I'm trying to write tidy, modular code which includes a long-running process. From time to time I MIGHT like to check in on the progress

Re: Passing DLL handle as an argument (in Windows)

Hmm. Let me describe what is going a bit more carefully: What I build is a dll file that has exported function that gets called when the host application/dll loads my dll. In this function the function pointers to the actual SDK functions are fetched. After this my dll's registers some plugins tha

[ANN] Data Plotting Library Dislin 10.2

Dear Python programmers, I am pleased to announce version 10.2 of the data plotting software Dislin. Dislin is a high-level and easy to use plotting library for displaying data as curves, bar graphs, pie charts, 3D-colour plots, surfaces, contours and maps. Several output formats are supported s

Re: How to insert my own module in front of site eggs?

On 18/11/11 03:58:46, alex23 wrote: On Nov 18, 11:36 am, Roy Smith wrote: What if the first import of a module is happening inside some code you don't have access to? No import will happen until you import something. That would be the case if you use the '-S' command line option. Otherwis

Re: Passing DLL handle as an argument (in Windows)

On Nov 18, 10:27 am, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > Am 18.11.2011 08:51, schrieb Pekka Kytölä: > > > Is it possible to pass my own dll's (already loaded) handle as an > > argument to load/attach to the very same instance of dll? Thing is > > that I've done plugin (dll) to a host app and the SDK's functi

Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

Hi All, I'm trying to leverage my core i5 to send more UDP packets with multiprocssing, but I found a interesting thing is that the socket.bind is always reporting 10048 error even the process didn't do anything about the socket. Here is the script import threading,socket,random,pp,os import ti

Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be?

Am 18.11.2011 05:34 schrieb Dennis Lee Bieber: >> def _pass(*args): >> pass >> >> def long_running_process(arg1, arg2, arg_etc, report = _pass): >> result1 = do_stuff() >> report(result1) > > So this is a call to a function that just returns a None, which is > dropped by the interpr

Re: Passing DLL handle as an argument (in Windows)

Am 18.11.2011 08:51, schrieb Pekka Kytölä: Is it possible to pass my own dll's (already loaded) handle as an argument to load/attach to the very same instance of dll? Thing is that I've done plugin (dll) to a host app and the SDK's function pointers are assigned once the dll is loaded in the host

useless python - term rewriter

## term rewriter (python 3.1.1) def gettokens(string): spaced = string.replace('(',' ( ').replace(')',' ) ') return spaced.split() def getterm(tokens): if tokens[0] in '()': term = [] assert tokens[0] == '(' tokens.pop(0) while not tokens[0] == ')': te