There is this nice page of testing tools taxonomy:
http://pycheesecake.org/wiki/PythonTestingToolsTaxonomy
But it does not list staf: http://staf.sourceforge.net/index.php.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks, Cristian! It works.
> List of Pygtk: http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Thanks again. Subscribed :)
2011/5/7 craf :
> Hi.
>
> Try this:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> import gtk.glade
>
> class TestPyGtk:
> """This is an Hello World GTK application"""
>
> def __init__(self):
On May 6, 2011 7:05 PM, "Даниил Рыжков" wrote:
>
> Sorry for my English (I could not find help in the Russian community)
> I'm trying to learn PyGTK and Glade. I made test window in Glade and
> saved it as "test.glade" (attached). Then I wrote script
> "test.py"(attached, http://pastebin.com/waKyt
> I haven't used gtk before, but is there a show method or something similar
> you need, to actually make the window appear?
I don't know. I think "self.wTree = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile)"
should do this. For example, author of this tutorial
(http://www.learningpython.com/2006/05/07/creating-a-g
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:57:21 -0700, scattered wrote:
> is there any problem with
>
> (3) if li == []:
>
> ?
>
> Seems to work when I test it and seems to clearly test what you are
> trying to test. The only problem might be if in some contexts == has the
> semantics of checking for object ident
On Fri, 06 May 2011 16:05:09 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I'd never accept code like "if not x" as an empty test.
So much the worse for you then.
The point of the "if x" idiom is that it is a polymorphic test which is
independent of the type. It works with any non-broken object[1], no
m
On May 6, 2011 7:05 PM, "Даниил Рыжков" wrote:
>
> Sorry for my English (I could not find help in the Russian community)
> I'm trying to learn PyGTK and Glade. I made test window in Glade and
> saved it as "test.glade" (attached). Then I wrote script
> "test.py"(attached, http://pastebin.com/waKyt
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:39:15 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
> On the other hand, consider this 3.x code snip:
>
> print("the %s is %d" % ('sky', 'blue'))
>
>
> That formatting will throw an exception, because the format
> construct is restricting the format entry to be a number, which 'b
Sorry for my English (I could not find help in the Russian community)
I'm trying to learn PyGTK and Glade. I made test window in Glade and
saved it as "test.glade" (attached). Then I wrote script
"test.py"(attached, http://pastebin.com/waKytam3). I tried to run it.
While the script was executed, co
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:49 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
>> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> >>> (2) if not li:
>> >> This is fine.
>> > This is the intended way. Anything in addition is extra noise and wasted
>> > calculation. In other words, let Pyt
On May 7, 12:51 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Philip Semanchuk wrote:
> > What if it's not a list but a tuple or a numpy array? Often I just want to
> > iterate through an element's items and I don't care if it's a list, set,
> > etc. For instance, given this function d
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, dmitrey wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it doesn't work, it turn out to be dict_items:
>>
>> next({1:2}.items())
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "", line 1, in
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> def emsg(x):
> if isinstance(x,tuple):
> x = (x,)
> print(The following object caused a proplem: %s" % x)
>
Couldn't you just do that unconditionally?
print(The following object caused a proplem: %s" % (x,))
Chris Angelico
--
http://mail
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Philip Semanchuk wrote:
> What if it's not a list but a tuple or a numpy array? Often I just want to
> iterate through an element's items and I don't care if it's a list, set, etc.
> For instance, given this function definition --
>
> def print_items(an_iterable):
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:25 AM, harrismh777 wrote:
> Chris Torek wrote:
>>>
>>> with the Python-named-Monty, we have "rigidly defined areas of
>>> >doubt and uncertainty". These exist for good reasons: to allow
>>> >different implementations.
>>
>> Oops, attribution error: this comes from Douglas
On May 6, 2011, at 5:57 PM, scattered wrote:
> On May 6, 2:36 am, Jabba Laci wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
>>
>> li = []
>>
>> (1) if len(li) == 0:
>> ...
>> or
>> (2) if not li:
>> ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Laszlo
>
> is there any
On May 5, 11:36 pm, Jabba Laci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
>
> li = []
>
> (1) if len(li) == 0:
> ...
> or
> (2) if not li:
The Python core developers use the second form.
See http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
for the official rec
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, dmitrey wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work, it turn out to be dict_items:
next({1:2}.items())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError: dict_items object is not an iterator
So call iter() on it first:
next(iter(m
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Dick Bridges wrote:
> Simple question: Is it true that no setuptools (or any other module
> installer) exists for 64-bit python 2.7.1? If there is an installer that
> works, what terms might I use to Google for information on how to acquire
> and install it?
Doesn't
On May 6, 2:36 am, Jabba Laci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
>
> li = []
>
> (1) if len(li) == 0:
> ...
> or
> (2) if not li:
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laszlo
is there any problem with
(3) if li == []:
?
Seems to work when I test it and seem
[dmitrey]
> hi all,
> suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
> I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
> one) and perform some operation.
> In Python 2 I used mere
> key, val = myDict.items()[0]
> but in Python 3 myDict.items() return iterator.
> Of
On 5/6/2011 3:22 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
I don't really like the old style, not because there is anything wrong
with it,
There is in that it special cases tuples. For instance, a message
function like
def emsg(x):
print("The following object caused a proplem: %s" % x)
raises "TypeError: n
dmitrey writes:
> hi all,
> suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
> I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
> one) and perform some operation.
> In Python 2 I used mere
> key, val = myDict.items()[0]
> but in Python 3 myDict.items() return iterato
I have one sqlite database called aripuanaonline.db. In this database I have
one table with two collumns first with autoincrement not null and other with
varchar(100) not null.
I got this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Documents and Settings\Marco\Desktop\aripuanaonline\arip
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, dmitrey wrote:
> Unfortunately, it doesn't work, it turn out to be dict_items:
next({1:2}.items())
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> TypeError: dict_items object is not an iterator
So call iter() on it first:
next(iter(myDict.item
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> - and ignore the Pythonistas [they're nuts; that x.count() doesn't work
> is amazingly stupid].
Eh? It works fine. [5, 2, 2, 1, 2].count(2) == 3. If you mean you want
len(x) to be spelled x.count(), that's equally stupid; `count` woul
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:49 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
> >>> (2) if not li:
> >> This is fine.
> > This is the intended way. Anything in addition is extra noise and wasted
> > calculation. In other words, let Python do the boilerplate work for you.
> I agree, but I don't lik
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:40 PM, dmitrey wrote:
>> hi all,
>> suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
>> I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
>> one) and perform some operation.
>> In Python 2
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/6/2011 7:34 AM, James Mills wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jabba Laci wrote:
>>
>>> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> (2) if not li:
>>>
>>
>> This is fine.
>>
>
> T
[Steven D'Aprano]:
> As written, amb is just a brute-force solver using more magic than is
> good for any code, but it's fun to play with.
With a small change in API, much of the magic isn't needed.
from itertools import product
def amb(func, *argument_ranges):
for args in product(*argument_
On May 6, 10:51 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:40 PM, dmitrey wrote:
> > hi all,
> > suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
> > I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
> > one) and perform some operation.
> > In Python 2 I used
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
> harrismh777 wrote: OP wrote:
>
>> (1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
>>
>> (2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
>>
>> (3) "the {} is {}".format('sky', 'blue')
>
> On the other hand, consider this 3.x code snip:
>
> print("the %s i
On 2011-05-06, harrismh777 wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> It's perfectly safe to continue using % formatting, if you
>> choose.
>
> I would hope so, since its the way in most of the books, much
> of the doc and a majority of the code...
>
> I don't really like the old style, not because there
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:40 PM, dmitrey wrote:
> hi all,
> suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
> I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
> one) and perform some operation.
> In Python 2 I used mere
> key, val = myDict.items()[0]
> but in Python
Terry Reedy wrote:
(2) if not li:
This is fine.
This is the intended way. Anything in addition is extra noise and wasted
calculation. In other words, let Python do the boilerplate work for you.
I agree, but I don't like it.
... if not li says nothing about what li is supposed to 'be' a
hi all,
suppose I have Python dict myDict and I know it's not empty.
I have to get any (key, value) pair from the dict (no matter which
one) and perform some operation.
In Python 2 I used mere
key, val = myDict.items()[0]
but in Python 3 myDict.items() return iterator.
Of course, I could use
for ke
harrismh777 wrote:OP wrote:
(1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
(2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
(3) "the {} is {}".format('sky', 'blue')
On the other hand, consider this 3.x code snip:
print("the %s is %d" % ('sky', 'blue'))
That formatting will throw an exception
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> This is typically implemented using continuations, and I'm not sure
> whether a true amb could actually be achieved in Python without adding
> continuations or flow-control macros to the language.
I stand corrected. After poking around a bit mo
On 5/6/2011 7:34 AM, James Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jabba Laci wrote:
If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
[...]
(2) if not li:
This is fine.
This is the intended way. Anything in addition is extra noise and wasted
calculation. In o
Chris Torek wrote:
with the Python-named-Monty, we have "rigidly defined areas of
>doubt and uncertainty". These exist for good reasons: to allow
>different implementations.
Oops, attribution error: this comes from Douglas Adams rather
than Monty Python.
Well, its certainly Monte-esq I li
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
It's perfectly safe to continue using % formatting, if you choose.
I would hope so, since its the way in most of the books, much of the
doc and a majority of the code...
I don't really like the old style, not because there is anything
wrong with it, because its
In article I wrote, in part:
>Like it or not, Python has similar "defined as undefined" grey
>areas: one is not promised, for instance, whether the "is" operator
>is always True for small integers that are equal (although it is
>in CPython), nor when __del__ is called (if ever), and so on. As
>wi
Alister Ware writes:
> On Thu, 05 May 2011 21:55:22 -0700, Ashraf Ali wrote:
>
>> Do you need legal help.If so Please visit
>>
>
> sorry I would only use a reputable firm
> (spaming a news group makes you disreputable by default)
Does it make you disreputable? Since you just repeated the spamve
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> As written, amb is just a brute-force solver using more magic than is
> good for any code, but it's fun to play with.
This isn't really amb; as you said it's just a brute-force solver with
some weird syntax. The whole point of amb is to e
In article
harrismh777 wrote:
>There may be some language somewhere that does pass-by-reference which
>is not implemented under the hood as pointers, but I can't think of
>any... 'cause like I've been saying, way down under the hood, we only
>have direct and indirect memory addressing in to
>>> John Nagle wrote:
A reasonable compromise would be that "is" is treated as "==" on
immutable objects.
(Note: I have no dog in this fight, I would be happy with a changed
"is" or with the current one -- leaky abstractions are fine with
me, provided I am told *when* they may -- or some
On Thu, 05 May 2011 21:55:22 -0700, Ashraf Ali wrote:
> Do you need legal help.If so Please visit
> www.chicagopersonalinjurylawyerz.blogspot.com
sorry I would only use a reputable firm
(spaming a news group makes you disreputable by default)
--
My NOSE is NUMB!
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
On 06-05-11 15:56, Nico Grubert wrote:
However, running the selftest still fails:
$ python selftest.py
*** The _imaging C module is not installed
I had this happening to me as well someday.
I recall that first installing it (python setup.py install), and then
rerunning selftest, solved that
Hi all,
Can someone provide some search terms I can use to find guidelines for
installing modules for my 'stock' 64-bit r 271:86832, Nov 27, 2010 [MSC
v.1500 64 bit (AMD)] on Win32. Host is 64-bit Windows 7.
My goal is to install suds. Period. That's all. So far I've spent the better
part o
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 10:33:31 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>> I think it is time to give some visibility to some of the instructive
>> and very cool recipes in ActiveState's python cookbook.
> [...]
>> What are your favorites?
>
>
> I'm
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:20 AM, dmitrey wrote:
> Thanks Cris, however, I had understood reason of the bug and mere
> informed Python developers of the bug to fix it.
No you haven't. Few if any Python developers make a habit of reading
this newsgroup. To actually report the issue so that it migh
On Mon, 02 May 2011 10:33:31 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I think it is time to give some visibility to some of the instructive
> and very cool recipes in ActiveState's python cookbook.
[...]
> What are your favorites?
I'm not sure if favourite is the right word, but I'm amazed by this one:
On 06/05/2011 16:06, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:58 +0100, MRAB wrote:
On 06/05/2011 08:18, Jabba Laci wrote:
Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
(1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
(2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
(3) "the {} is {}".format('sky',
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:58 +0100, MRAB wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 08:18, Jabba Laci wrote:
> > Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
> > (1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
> > (2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
> > (3) "the {} is {}".format('sky', 'blue')
> > As I know (1) is old
On 06/05/2011 08:18, Jabba Laci wrote:
Hi,
Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
(1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
(2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
(3) "the {} is {}".format('sky', 'blue')
As I know (1) is old style. (2) and (3) are new but (3) is only
supported from
No thanks, it's shareware, doesn't included embedded python
interpreter out-of-the-box, and isn't portable.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, JussiJ wrote:
> On Apr 16, 1:20 pm, Alec Taylor wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for an IDE which offers syntax-highlighting,
>> code-completion, tabs,
>
> The Zeus
Hi,
Wingware has released version 4.0.2 of Wing IDE, an integrated development
environment designed specifically for the Python programming language.
Wing IDE is a cross-platform Python IDE that provides a professional code
editor with vi, emacs, and other key bindings, auto-completion, call tip
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:10:17 +0200, Web Dreamer wrote:
> What I would like to know is the difference between "deprecated" and
> "obsolete"...
Writing x*x instead of x**2 is obsolete, but it will never go away.
Writing apply(func, args) instead of func(*args) is deprecated. It has
gone away.
O
On Fri, 06 May 2011 02:23:19 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:00:30 +0200, Web Dreamer wrote:
>>> Jabba Laci a écrit ce vendredi 6 mai 2011 09:18 dans
>>> :
Hi,
Which is the preferred way of string form
> PIL will compile and install if you don't have some development
> libraries and then simply not work or not work up to full steam when
> used.
>
> To avoid this, you need to install the appropriate libraries, among
> which are:
>
> libjpeg-devel
> freetype-devel
> libpng-devel
Dear Albert
Tha
On 06/05/2011 14:17, scattered wrote:
On May 6, 8:25 am, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 06.05.2011 14:09, schrieb scattered:
sets could also work
if set('abc')& set(line) == set():
print line
Right!
Sets work in this special case, because the OP just wants to search for
a single char.
> I used py2exe in the past for that, see
> http://www.py2exe.org/index.cgi/ShippingEmbedded
Thanks for the advice, py2exe seems to be a great tool.
Unfortunately the application stops executing at the same place. It
might be the case of PIL library, I found some entries about it on
py2exe site.
On May 6, 8:25 am, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 06.05.2011 14:09, schrieb scattered:
>
> > sets could also work
>
> > if set('abc') & set(line) == set():
> > print line
>
> Right!
> Sets work in this special case, because the OP just wants to search for
> a single char. It won't work for long
On 2011-05-05, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> "Hey, let's override operator,() and have some fun"
>
> Destroying sanity, for fun and profit.
I was thinking more along the lines of stuff like combining the
envelope pattern (an interface class containin
Hi Chris,
thanks for fast reply and all recommendations in helps me much!
as you recommended me i used Pdfminer module to extract the text from pdf
files and then with file.xreadlines() I allocated the lines where my
keyword ("factors in this case") appears.
Till now i extract just the lines but
On May 6, 8:10 am, Web Dreamer wrote:
> Chris Rebert a écrit ce vendredi 6 mai 2011 11:23 dans
> :
>
>
>
> > I'm not them, but:
> > "Note: The formatting operations described here [involving %] are
> > obsolete and may go away in future versions of Python. Use the new
> > String Formatting [i.e.
@Michel
use PIL downloaded from here: http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/
regards
2011/5/6 Christian Heimes :
> Am 06.05.2011 01:48, schrieb Michel Claveau - MVP:
>> Re!
>>
>> And why the problem no exist with PIL 1.1.6? (only 1.1.7)
>> Is that the version 1.1.6 does not use these librari
[1011_wxy]
I got a import error when I use Python 3.2 to import BeautifulSoup 3.2.0
the error i see is a SyntaxError.
Is there any differences between Python 3.2 and other version?
yes. and there is a tool, 2to3, which converts
Python 2.x scripts to work with 3.x.
And the error message w
Am 06.05.2011 14:09, schrieb scattered:
> sets could also work
>
> if set('abc') & set(line) == set():
> print line
Right!
Sets work in this special case, because the OP just wants to search for
a single char. It won't work for longer strings, though.
Also I would write the test as:
if set
On May 6, 7:00 am, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 06.05.2011 12:47, schrieb Lutfi Oduncuoglu:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use something
> > like
>
> > if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
> > print line
>
> > But it does not work for. What may be th
On May 6, 2:59 pm, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 10:51, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 3:39 pm, snorble wrote:
> >> I appreciate any advice or guidance anyone has to offer.
>
> > The 'Python Project HOWTO' gives good advice in terms of setting up a
> > new project, what files and di
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Lutfi Oduncuoglu
wrote:
> I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use something
> like
>
> if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
> print line
>
> But it does not work for. What may be the problem
You will need to (naively) do this:
if "a" not
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jabba Laci wrote:
> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
[...]
> (2) if not li:
This is fine.
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- "Problems are solved by method"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:47 +0300, Lutfi Oduncuoglu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use
>> something like
>>
>> if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
>> print line
>>
>
> The expression:
>
Correction:
('a' or 'b' or 'c') evaluates to 'a'
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:47 +0300, Lutfi Oduncuoglu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use
> something like
>
> if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
>print line
>
The expression:
('a' or 'b' or 'c')
evaluates to True
True not in line
Is
Am 06.05.2011 12:47, schrieb Lutfi Oduncuoglu:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use something
> like
>
> if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
>print line
>
> But it does not work for. What may be the problem
if any(s not in line for s in ('a', 'b', 'c'))
Hi,
I am trying to write a script and I realised that I need to use something
like
if ('a' or 'b' or 'c') not in line:
print line
But it does not work for. What may be the problem
Thanks,
Lutfi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 6, 7:36 am, Jabba Laci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
>
> li = []
>
> (1) if len(li) == 0:
> ...
> or
> (2) if not li:
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laszlo
I prefer (1), it feels more explicit about what I'm testing. The fact
that empty sequ
On May 6, 12:57 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:24 AM, dmitrey wrote:
> > hi all,
>
> > suppose I've created a class Point in file .../openopt/kernel/Point.py
>
> > Consider the code in file .../somewhere/file1.py
> > from openopt.kernel.Point import Point
> > p = Point()
>
> >
Am 06.05.2011 01:48, schrieb Michel Claveau - MVP:
> Re!
>
> And why the problem no exist with PIL 1.1.6? (only 1.1.7)
> Is that the version 1.1.6 does not use these libraries?
PIL 1.1.6 also uses its internal C library to speed things up.
For Windows you should use the precompiled packages.
ht
> Are you calling Py_SetProgramName? That may help to set sys.prefix
> and sys.exec_prefix. However, looking at site.py, it appears that
> it's only looking for proper directories. I don't think it will be
> able to add a site-packages inside a zip archive at all; you will just
> have to add tha
On 06/05/2011 10:51, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
On Apr 26, 3:39 pm, snorble wrote:
I appreciate any advice or guidance anyone has to offer.
The 'Python Project HOWTO' gives good advice in terms of setting up a
new project, what files and directories to create, what to put in
version control, etc
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:24 AM, dmitrey wrote:
> hi all,
>
> suppose I've created a class Point in file .../openopt/kernel/Point.py
>
> Consider the code in file .../somewhere/file1.py
> from openopt.kernel.Point import Point
> p = Point()
>
> now let's pass p into a func from .../openopt/kernel/f
On Apr 26, 3:39 pm, snorble wrote:
> I appreciate any advice or guidance anyone has to offer.
The 'Python Project HOWTO' gives good advice in terms of setting up a
new project, what files and directories to create, what to put in
version control, etc:
http://infinitemonkeycorps.net/docs/pph/
Al
hi all,
suppose I've created a class Point in file .../openopt/kernel/Point.py
Consider the code in file .../somewhere/file1.py
from openopt.kernel.Point import Point
p = Point()
now let's pass p into a func from .../openopt/kernel/file2.py and
check
from Point import Point
isinstance(p, Point)
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:00:30 +0200, Web Dreamer wrote:
>> Jabba Laci a écrit ce vendredi 6 mai 2011 09:18 dans
>> :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
>>>
>>> (1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
>>>
>>> (2) "t
On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:00:30 +0200, Web Dreamer wrote:
> Jabba Laci a écrit ce vendredi 6 mai 2011 09:18 dans
> :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
>>
>> (1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
>>
>> (2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
>>
>> (3) "the {} is {
Hi,
Which is the preferred way of string formatting?
(1) "the %s is %s" % ('sky', 'blue')
(2) "the {0} is {1}".format('sky', 'blue')
(3) "the {} is {}".format('sky', 'blue')
As I know (1) is old style. (2) and (3) are new but (3) is only
supported from Python 2.7+.
Which one should be used?
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Jabba Laci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to check if a list is empty, which is the more pythonic way?
Option (2), IMO.
> li = []
>
> (1) if len(li) == 0:
> ...
FYI, also equivalent:
if not len(li):
...
> or
> (2) if not li:
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://mail.pytho
90 matches
Mail list logo
