On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jerry Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jason Swails
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change the
> way in which a python program quits if an exception is not caught. The
> program
Sale Sale Sale. Just visit the following link to buy computer
accessories. You can buy computer accessories on reasonable prices.
just visit
http://www.onlineshoppingpk.blogspot.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:18 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:04 AM, harrismh777 wrote:
> >Not so fast there, Steve. If they [Microsoft] are paying anything
> > (unsubstantiated, unknowable) to Python, Apache, or (Linux, whatever you
> > mean by that term...) there are
Chris Angelico wrote:
> All software can be expressed as lambda calculus. The point being, all
> software is mathematics...
With enough software, you can simulate anything. That means that the
entire universe can be expressed as lambda calculus. Does that mean
that nothing can ever be pa
In article
,
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I think you're going to need a queue of tests, with your own test
> runner consuming the queue, and your on-the-fly test creator running
> as a producer thread.
>
> Writing your own test runner isn't difficult. 1) wait on the queue
> for a new test case
Chris Angelico wrote:
Not so fast there, Steve. If they [Microsoft] are paying anything
> (unsubstantiated, unknowable) to Python, Apache, or (Linux, whatever you
> mean by that term...) there are only two motives:
http://www.python.org/psf/ - Microsoft is listed.
http://www.apache.o
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:04 AM, harrismh777 wrote:
> Not so fast there, Steve. If they [Microsoft] are paying anything
> (unsubstantiated, unknowable) to Python, Apache, or (Linux, whatever you
> mean by that term...) there are only two motives:
http://www.python.org/psf/ - Microsoft is list
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What do you mean 'just like"?They are nothing alike.
All three of Python, Apache and Linux have accepted donations from
Microsoft. Microsoft is a corporate sponsor of the PSF. Microsoft is not
in the business of donating money and time to competitors out of the
Mel writes:
> Python is a pragmatic language, so all the rules come pre-broken.
+1 QOTW
--
\ “Science shows that belief in God is not only obsolete. It is |
`\also incoherent.” —Victor J. Stenger, 2001 |
_o__)
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change the way
> in which a python program quits if an exception is not caught. The program
> has many different classes of exceptions (for clarity purposes)
On 8 apr, 03:10, sturlamolden wrote:
> That was easy, 64-bit support for Windows is done :-)
>
> Now I'll just have to fix the Linux code, and figure out what to do
> with os._exit preventing clean-up on exit... :-(
Now it feel dumb, it's not worse than monkey patching os._exit, which
I should h
On 10 apr, 18:27, John Nagle wrote:
> Unless you have a performance problem, don't bother with shared
> memory.
>
> If you have a performance problem, Python is probably the wrong
> tool for the job anyway.
Then why does Python have a multiprocessing module?
In my opinion, if Python has
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Jason Swails wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>>
>> 2011.04.10. 21:25 keltezéssel, Jason Swails írta:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change the
>> way in which a python prog
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> 2011.04.10. 21:25 keltezéssel, Jason Swails írta:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change the
> way in which a python program quits if an exception is not caught. The
> program has many di
2011.04.10. 21:25 keltezéssel, Jason Swails írta:
Hello everyone,
This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change
the way in which a python program quits if an exception is not
caught. The program has many different classes of exceptions (for
clarity purposes), and they'r
Hello everyone,
This may sound like a bit of a strange desire, but I want to change the way
in which a python program quits if an exception is not caught. The program
has many different classes of exceptions (for clarity purposes), and they're
raised whenever something goes wrong. Most I want to
On 4/10/2011 5:12 AM, candide wrote:
Le 10/04/2011 04:01, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Yes. (Look in the manuals,
I did : my main reference book is the Martelli's /Python in a Nutshell/
You should only use that as a supplement.
and the index doesn't refer to the keyword import
and now you kno
On 10-Apr-11 12:21 PM, Mel wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Who would use keyword arguments with a function that takes only one arg
anyway?
It's hard to imagine. Maybe somebody trying to generalize function calls
(trying to interpret some other language using a python program?)
# e.g. input win
newpyth writes:
[...]
> My main goal is to arrange OO in a paradigmatic manner in order to
> apply to it the
> procedural scheme. especially to the caller or called modules.
> Bye.
I have some troubles understanding what you mean.
Can you write an example of code that it's for you annoying and
On 10/04/2011 13:22, Jean-Pierre M wrote:
> I created a simple program which writes in a unicode files some
french text with accents!
[snip]
This line:
l.p("premier message de Log à accents")
passes a bytestring to the method, and inside the method, this line:
unicode_str=u'%s : %s \n
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 23:55 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 01:37:45 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >>> The reason Mono gets hit (from others besides me) is that they are in
> >>> > partnership and collaboration with Microsoft, consciously and
> >>>
Hi all,
I must thank before Andrea Crotti and Steven D'Aprano, which kindly
replayed to my post... they deserve an answer.
To Andrea Crotti's "OOP makes life easier also to the user"... that is
NOT
my experience...
I'm not pretending that everyone else thinks like me (also if many
people do...
load
On 4/10/2011 9:11 AM, Miki Tebeka wrote:
Now, I don't know that I actually HAVE to pass my neural network and
input data as copies -- they're both READ-ONLY objects for the
duration of an evaluate function (which can go on for quite a while).
One option in that case is to use "fork" (if you're o
Chris Angelico wrote:
> Who would use keyword arguments with a function that takes only one arg
> anyway?
It's hard to imagine. Maybe somebody trying to generalize function calls
(trying to interpret some other language using a python program?)
# e.g. input winds up having the effect of ..
fun
> Now, I don't know that I actually HAVE to pass my neural network and
> input data as copies -- they're both READ-ONLY objects for the
> duration of an evaluate function (which can go on for quite a while).
One option in that case is to use "fork" (if you're on a *nix machine).
See http://pythonwi
A new version of the Python module which wraps GnuPG has been
released.
What Changed?
=
This is a minor enhancement and bug-fix release. See the project
website ( http://code.google.com/p/python-gnupg/ ) for more
information. Summary:
Better support for status messages from GnuPG.
The
On 9 apr, 22:18, John Ladasky wrote:
> So, there are limited advantages to trying to parallelize the
> evaluation of ONE cascade network's weights against ONE input vector.
> However, evaluating several copies of one cascade network's output,
> against several different test inputs simultaneously
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Babu wrote:
> Are there any more different approaches? I suppose if we take the
> daemon approach then we can make it as a webservice as well?
Yes, your daemon could function via HTTP. But if you go that route,
you would need some way to collect all the differen
On Apr 8, 5:40 am, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 07.04.2011 21:14, schrieb Anssi Saari:
>
> > Chris Angelico writes:
>
> >> Depending on what exactly is needed, it might be easier to run a
> >> separate daemon on the computers, one whose sole purpose is to do the
> >> task / get the statistics needed
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:35:48 -0700, newpyth wrote:
> Hi all,
> from the subject of my post, you can see I do not like very much OOP...
> and I am not the only one... Knowing that python is intrinsecally OO, I
> propose to move all OOP stuff (classes, instances and so on) to modules.
Python is bas
Andrea Crotti writes:
[...]
I left the Timeline as before, but tried to rewrite some more classes.
This is the abstract class for a metric, and below another class for the
metric which involve only counting things.
In the end an example on how to use this.
I need to see synthetic values during
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:54 PM, candide wrote:
> Anyway, passing x as a keyword argument to the bool function appears to be
> very rare : i did a regexp search for about 3 source-code Python files
> (among them official Python source-code, Django, Sphinx, Eric source-code
> and many more sou
Le 08/04/2011 18:41, Benjamin Kaplan a écrit :
bool(x=5) is just passing the value 5 as the argument "x" to the function.
Anyway, passing x as a keyword argument to the bool function appears to
be very rare : i did a regexp search for about 3 source-code Python
files (among them offici
I created a simple program which writes in a unicode files some french text
with accents!
*# -*- coding: cp1252 -*-*
*#!/usr/bin/python*
*'''*
*Created on 27 déc. 2010*
*
*
*@author: jpmena*
*'''*
*from datetime import datetime*
*import locale*
*import codecs*
*import os,sys*
*
*
*class Log(object)
What you suggested solved my problem, but unfortunately it did reveal that the
HTML that I was parsing was not compliant with the DTD that it should have
been. There were a lot of missing end tags.
In light of this frustrating problem i've gone back to the source docbook code.
There are many is
I wrote some dirty script for Function Scheduling and pausing them !
May some look and point mistakes, I am totally new to python !
https://gist.github.com/911942
--
┌─┐
│ Narendra Sisodiya
│ http://narendrasisodiya.com
└─┘
--
http://mail.py
newpyth writes:
> Hi all,
> from the subject of my post, you can see I do not
> like very much OOP... and I am not the only one...
> Knowing that python is intrinsecally OO, I propose
> to move all OOP stuff (classes, instances and so on)
> to modules.
> In this way the OOP fan can keep on using
I've been wondering for weeks now how to do but I still didn't get a
satisfying answer, so I hope someone can give a hint...
I have some logs which I extract from simulation results.
These logs are in the form
timestamp, nodeid, eventname, event_argument
and now I have to analyze the data.
I don
Hi all,
from the subject of my post, you can see I do not
like very much OOP... and I am not the only one...
Knowing that python is intrinsecally OO, I propose
to move all OOP stuff (classes, instances and so on)
to modules.
In this way the OOP fan can keep on using it, but
in a module recalled by
Le 10/04/2011 04:01, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Yes. (Look in the manuals,
I did : my main reference book is the Martelli's /Python in a Nutshell/
and the index doesn't refer to the keyword import
or try the obvious imports ;-)
The only obvious I saw was sys module.
--
http://mail.python
Le 10/04/2011 04:09, John Connor a écrit :
Actually this is all it takes:
import keywords
print keywords.kwlist
>>> import keywords
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ImportError: No module named keywords
>>>
so I considered first it was a joke ! ;) In fact the import
41 matches
Mail list logo
