On Sep 29, 5:32 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Malcolm McLean
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
> > wrote:
> >> On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
> >> your values (of whatever num
Keith Thompson wrote:
Erik Max Francis writes:
[...]
>>> print c # floating point accuracy aside
299792458.0 m/s
Actually, the speed of light is exactly 299792458.0 m/s by
definition. (The meter and the second are defined in terms of the
same wavelength of light; this was changed relatively
On 2010-09-29, Hidura wrote:
> I am working on a web project written on Py3k and using mod_wsgi on
> the Apache that have to recibes the request client via a xml structure
> and i am facing a lot of troubles with the upload files mainly because
> i can' t see where they are, so i' ve decide to wri
I am working on a web project written on Py3k and using mod_wsgi on
the Apache that have to recibes the request client via a xml structure
and i am facing a lot of troubles with the upload files mainly because
i can' t see where they are, so i' ve decide to write my own web
server-django and the ot
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:15:07 -0700, Keith Thompson
wrote:
>George Neuner writes:
>> On 28 Sep 2010 12:42:40 GMT, Albert van der Horst
>> wrote:
>>>I would say the dimensional checking is underrated. It must be
>>>complemented with a hard and fast rule about only using standard
>>>(SI) units int
Cool idea! I'll gladly take a look and get back to you.
-Matthew
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Zed Shaw wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I rarely post to the list, but I'm getting near the end of the book I
> wrote to help people learn Python and I would like some feedback on it
> if you please:
>
>
On 29/09/2010 01:19, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/28/2010 5:27 AM, AlexWalk wrote:
In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit), accessing __class__
of an int literal will raise a SyntaxException, while other literals
will not. For example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__ runs
ok.
Hi Everyone,
I rarely post to the list, but I'm getting near the end of the book I
wrote to help people learn Python and I would like some feedback on it
if you please:
* Web: http://learnpythonthehardway.org/
* PDF: http://learnpythonthehardway.org/static/LearnPythonTheHardWay.pdf
The book so f
On 9/28/2010 6:57 PM, kj wrote:
The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
s = 0
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
File "", line 1
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
What's the best way to get a list of partial su
On 9/28/2010 6:02 PM, Nick Donohue wrote:
I came across this code just now:
def time_me(function):
def wrap(*arg):
start = time.time()
r = function(*arg)
end = time.time()
print "%s (%0.3f ms)" %(function.func_name, (end-start)*1000)
return wrap
@time_me
def some_funct
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Malcolm McLean
wrote:
> On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
> wrote:
>> On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
>> your values (of whatever numerical type) in a symbolic expression
>> mentionning the un
On 9/28/2010 5:27 AM, AlexWalk wrote:
In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit), accessing __class__
of an int literal will raise a SyntaxException, while other literals
will not. For example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__ runs
ok.
Third solution:
>>> type(0) is 0 .__clas
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
1 inch + 1 second = ~4.03e38 grams.
GORY DETAILS:
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
+---
| Malcolm McLean said:
| > he problem is that if you allow expressions rather than terms then
| > the experssions can get arbitrarily complex. sqrt(1 inch + 1 Second),
| > for instance
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM, kj wrote:
>
>
> The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
>
> >>> s = 0
> >>> [((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
> File "", line 1
>[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
Because in Python
On 2010-09-28, Gary Herron wrote:
> Python does have "s+=t" as a statement, and it does have list
> comprehensions [... for ...] as expressions, but you cannot put a
> statement inside an expression.
I've inferred that, in Python, all assignments are by definition
statements, rather than expre
On 28/09/2010 23:57, kj wrote:
The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
s = 0
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
File "", line 1
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
What's the best way to get a list of partial sum
On 9/28/2010 3:57 PM kj said...
The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
s = 0
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
File "", line 1
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
What's the best way to get a list of partial su
On 28/09/2010 23:54, Brendan Miller wrote:
I'm using python 2.5.
Currently I have some python bindings written in ctypes. On the C
side, my strings are in utf-8. On the python side I use
ctypes.c_char_p to convert my strings to python strings. However, this
seems to break for non-ascii character
I am trying to upload any type of file ext to an app written in Py3k,
using Apache+mod_wsgi i can't use django or cherryPy because i manage
the data in the request creating an xml to store the data from
selected areas and send it to the server. I am using the wsgiref
library to handle the request a
On 09/28/2010 03:57 PM, kj wrote:
The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
s = 0
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
File "", line 1
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
What's the best way to get a lis
The following attempt to get a list of partial sums fails:
>>> s = 0
>>> [((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
File "", line 1
[((s += t) and s) for t in range(1, 10)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
What's the best way to get a list of partial sums?
TIA!
kj
--
http://mail.p
Erik Max Francis writes:
[...]
> >>> print c # floating point accuracy aside
> 299792458.0 m/s
Actually, the speed of light is exactly 299792458.0 m/s by
definition. (The meter and the second are defined in terms of the
same wavelength of light; this was changed relatively recently.)
--
Keith
I'm using python 2.5.
Currently I have some python bindings written in ctypes. On the C
side, my strings are in utf-8. On the python side I use
ctypes.c_char_p to convert my strings to python strings. However, this
seems to break for non-ascii characters.
It seems that characters not in the ascii
On 9/28/2010 3:31 PM, Hidura wrote:
Hello, i have a project on Python3k, and i have a very big problem i
don' t find how take an upload file i am using the wsgiref lib, and or
theres any way to connect to the client in order to get the file by
myself?
Thank you
Diego Hidalgo.
This is not cl
2010-09-28
On Sep 28, 12:07 pm, namekuseijin wrote:
> On 28 set, 14:56, Xah Lee wrote:
>
> > ultimately, all lang gets transformed at the compiler level to become
> > machine instructions, which is imperative programing in the ultimate
> > sense.
>
> > You say that “do” is merely macro and ultim
Hello, i have a project on Python3k, and i have a very big problem i
don' t find how take an upload file i am using the wsgiref lib, and or
theres any way to connect to the client in order to get the file by
myself?
Thank you
Diego Hidalgo.
--
Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil
Diego I. Hidalgo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nick Donohue wrote:
> I came across this code just now:
>
> def time_me(function):
> def wrap(*arg):
>start = time.time()
>r = function(*arg)
>end = time.time()
>print "%s (%0.3f ms)" %(function.func_name, (end-start)*1000)
> return wrap
>
> @tim
Nick Donohue writes:
> I came across this code just now:
>
> def time_me(function):
> def wrap(*arg):
> start = time.time()
> r = function(*arg)
> end = time.time()
> print "%s (%0.3f ms)" %(function.func_name, (end-start)*1000)
> return wrap
>
> @time_me
> def some_function(s
On 2010-09-28, Nick Donohue wrote:
> why would I use these? wouldn't it be more flexible to not write the
> decorator before the function definition, so I could choose to wrap it
> or not?
The utility is that it lets you modify all calls to a function at once,
without changing all the instances i
Malcolm McLean wrote:
On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
your values (of whatever numerical type) in a symbolic expression
mentionning the unit and perhaps other meta data, so that when
I came across this code just now:
def time_me(function):
def wrap(*arg):
start = time.time()
r = function(*arg)
end = time.time()
print "%s (%0.3f ms)" %(function.func_name, (end-start)*1000)
return wrap
@time_me
def some_function(somearg)
some_function(arg)
I've been lookin
Yesterday i pushed version 0.4 of JSONBOT to pypi and googlecode. This
version has a rewritten core that makes it easier to develop bots for
and has lots of bugs fixed. A karma plugin was added as well as a
silent mode that forwards bot responses to /msg.
You can grab a copy on http://jsonbot.goog
On 27 September 2010 18:46, namekuseijin wrote:
> Fact is: almost all user data from the external words comes into
> programs as strings.
Sorry, sent this to the individual, not the group.
I'd be very surprised if that were true. I suspect the majority of
programs are in embedded systems, and
Pyro 4.2
-
I'm pleased to announce the release of Pyro 4.2!
Detailed info here: http://www.razorvine.net/python/Pyro
Download here: http://www.xs4all.nl/~irmen/pyro4/download/
Python package index entry: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Pyro4
License: MIT software license.
Note: Pyro 4 is not
Paul Rubin writes:
> John Bokma writes:
>> Xah Lee writes: ...
>> Can you stop crossposting?
>
> John, can you ALSO stop crossposting?
Since the issue is on-topic in all groups: no. I did set a follow-up
header, which you ignored and on top of that redirected the thing to
comp.lang.python. S
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:15 AM, rog wrote:
> Shashwat Anand wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Rog > r...@pynguins.com>> wrote:
>>
>>Hi all,
>>Have been grappling with a list problem for hours...
>>a = [2, 3, 4, 5,.]
>>b = [4, 8, 2, 6,.]
>>Basicly I am
Tim Golden wrote:
On 28/09/2010 10:27, AlexWalk wrote:
In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit), accessing __class__
of an int literal will raise a SyntaxException, while other literals
will not. For example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__
runs ok.
I searched the pyth
Hello Alex,
On 2010-09-28 11:27, AlexWalk wrote:
> In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit),
> accessing __class__ of an int literal will raise a
> SyntaxException, while other literals will not. For
> example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__ runs
> ok.
>
> I searched the p
Toto writes:
>> If your "alias" can be read-only:
>> alias = zip(*myList)
>
>
>
> a=[['00','01'],['10','11']]
> l=zip(*a)
> print(l)
>
> returns... [('00', '10'), ('01', '11')]
>
> IS NOT AT ALL WHAT I WANT ;-)
>
> What I want is
>
> print a[1][0]
> '10'
> but print l[1][0]
> '01'
>
> notice the
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Marco Gallotta wrote:
>
>
> We received a grant from Google to reach 1,000 kids in South Africa
> with our course in 2011. People have also shown interest in running
> the course in Croatia, Poland and Egypt. We're also eyeing developing
> African countries in the l
heu the zip trick actually works... my mistake!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
again I want:
alias[y][x] returns myList[x][y]
> print a[1][0]
> '10'
> but print l[1][0]
> '01'
>
> notice the indexes of the list l are inverted...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article
,
Ronald Guida wrote:
> Sorry, I have one additional piece of information that might be helpful to
> others. I have discovered that the *.so files that were not installed, were
> actually installed to the ~/lib/python2.6/ folder instead of the
> ~/lib/python2.7/ folder where they be
> If your "alias" can be read-only:
> alias = zip(*myList)
a=[['00','01'],['10','11']]
l=zip(*a)
print(l)
returns... [('00', '10'), ('01', '11')]
IS NOT AT ALL WHAT I WANT ;-)
What I want is
print a[1][0]
'10'
but print l[1][0]
'01'
notice the indexes of the list l are inverted...
--
h
George Neuner writes:
> On 28 Sep 2010 12:42:40 GMT, Albert van der Horst
> wrote:
>>I would say the dimensional checking is underrated. It must be
>>complemented with a hard and fast rule about only using standard
>>(SI) units internally.
>>
>>Oil output internal : m^3/sec
>>Oil output printed:
t...@sevak.isi.edu (Thomas A. Russ) writes:
> Malcolm McLean writes:
>
>> I'd like to design a language like this. If you add a quantity in
>> inches to a quantity in centimetres you get a quantity in (say)
>> metres. If you multiply them together you get an area, if you divide
>> them you get a
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:59:08 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Rog wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Have been grappling with a list problem for hours... a = [2, 3, 4,
>> 5,.]
>> b = [4, 8, 2, 6,.]
>> Basicly I am trying to place a[0], b[0] in a seperate list IF a[2] and
John Bokma writes:
> Xah Lee writes: ...
> Can you stop crossposting?
John, can you ALSO stop crossposting?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Toto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a list of list
> assume myList[x][y] is integer
> I would like to create an alias to that list which I could call this
> way:
> alias[y][x] returns myList[x][y]
If your "alias" can be read-only:
alias = zip(*myList)
Cheers,
Chris
Hello,
I have a list of list
assume myList[x][y] is integer
I would like to create an alias to that list which I could call this
way:
alias[y][x] returns myList[x][y]
how can I do that ? (python 2.6)
(I have a feeling I should use 'property' ;)
Thanks,
--
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Rog wrote:
> Hi all,
> Have been grappling with a list problem for hours...
> a = [2, 3, 4, 5,.]
> b = [4, 8, 2, 6,.]
> Basicly I am trying to place a[0], b[0] in a seperate list
> IF a[2] and b[2] is present.
> I have tried sets, zip etc with no success.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Rog wrote:
> Hi all,
> Have been grappling with a list problem for hours...
> a = [2, 3, 4, 5,.]
> b = [4, 8, 2, 6,.]
> Basicly I am trying to place a[0], b[0] in a seperate list
> IF a[2] and b[2] is present.
>
You are not exactly clear with your proble
Hi all,
Have been grappling with a list problem for hours...
a = [2, 3, 4, 5,.]
b = [4, 8, 2, 6,.]
Basicly I am trying to place a[0], b[0] in a seperate list
IF a[2] and b[2] is present.
I have tried sets, zip etc with no success.
I am tackling Euler projects with Python 3.1, with minimal
k
On 28/09/2010 19:21, George Neuner wrote:
On 28 Sep 2010 12:42:40 GMT, Albert van der Horst
wrote:
I would say the dimensional checking is underrated. It must be
complemented with a hard and fast rule about only using standard
(SI) units internally.
Oil output internal : m^3/sec
Oil output p
On 28 Sep 2010 12:42:40 GMT, Albert van der Horst
wrote:
>I would say the dimensional checking is underrated. It must be
>complemented with a hard and fast rule about only using standard
>(SI) units internally.
>
>Oil output internal : m^3/sec
>Oil output printed: kbarrels/day
"barrel" is not a
Xah Lee writes:
> can you stop this?
Can you stop crossposting? And if there is really, really a need to
crosspost, can you please set the follow-up to?
> doesn't seems fruitful to keep on this.
>
> if you don't like my posts, ignore them? i don't post in
> comp.lang.python or comp.lang.perl.mi
Malcolm McLean writes:
> I'd like to design a language like this. If you add a quantity in
> inches to a quantity in centimetres you get a quantity in (say)
> metres. If you multiply them together you get an area, if you divide
> them you get a dimeionless scalar. If you divide a quantity in metr
xah wrote:
> in anycase, how's “do” not imperative?
On Sep 28, 6:27 am, namekuseijin wrote:
> > how's “do” a “named let”? can you show example or reference of that
> > proposal? (is it worthwhile?)
>
> I'll post it again in the hope you'll read this time:
>
> "
> (do ((i 0 (+ 1 i)) ; i initially
On 28/09/2010 17:32, Florian Kaufmann wrote:
If you want to anchor the regex at the start position 'pos' then use
the 'match' method instead.
The wickedly problem is that matching at position 'pos' is not a
requirement, its an option. Look again at my 2nd example, the
r'(\=|.)...' part, which (
On Sep 27, 9:34 pm, John Bokma wrote:
> Seebs writes:
>
> fup set to poster
>
> > On 2010-09-28, John Bokma wrote:
> >> Seebs writes:
> >>> On 2010-09-26, J?rgen Exner wrote:
> It was livibetter who without any motivation or reasoning posted Python
> code in CLPM.
>
> >>> Not exactly
Hi there!
As someone stuck with python 2.3 tried to use pylint, we made some fixes
to get python 2.3 supports back. This resulted in the release of pylint
0.21.3, logilab-astng 0.20.3 and logilab-common 0.52 today.
At the time of porting pylint to py3k, this will much probably be the latest
set
On Sep 27, 11:30 pm, harryos wrote:
> I had been using jaunty as o.s and was coding in python 2.6. While
> using Tix widgets in my code I came across a bug as mentioned in
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tix/+bug/371720
...
> So ,I thought upgrading to karmic would help .But even a
Albert van der Horst wrote:
In article <87fwwvrnmf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>,
...
I would even go further.
Types are only part of the story. You may distinguish between integers
and floating points, fine. But what about distinguishing between
floating points representing lengths and
> If you want to anchor the regex at the start position 'pos' then use
> the 'match' method instead.
The wickedly problem is that matching at position 'pos' is not a
requirement, its an option. Look again at my 2nd example, the
r'(\=|.)...' part, which (of course wrongly) assumes that \= means
'ma
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:07, Kruptein wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've released the second alpha for minimal-D a program I've written in
> python which should make developing easier.
> I need people to test the app on bugs and give ideas.
>
> It is written in python using the wxPython toolkit and is linu
King writes:
> Hi,
>
> After reading couple of docs and articles, I have implemented a simple
> test package with nested modules.
> When running "main.py", everything is working fine. Some of my sub-
> modules has some small test routines for debug purpose.
> It's because I am using relative pack
On 28/09/2010 09:10, Florian Kaufmann wrote:
From the documentation:
7.2.4. Regular Expression Objects, search(string[, pos[, endpos]])
... the '^' pattern character matches at the real beginning of the
string and at positions just after a newline, but not necessarily at
the index where the sea
On 2010-09-28 14:39:27 +0100, Malcolm McLean said:
he problem is that if you allow expressions rather than terms then
the experssions can get arbitrarily complex. sqrt(1 inch + 1 Second),
for instance.
I can't imagine a context where 1 inch + 1 second would not be an
error, so this is a sligh
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, it occurred to Florian Kaufmann to exclaim:
> >From the documentation:
> 7.2.4. Regular Expression Objects, search(string[, pos[, endpos]])
> ... the '^' pattern character matches at the real beginning of the
> string and at positions just after a newline, but not nece
On Sep 28, 12:19 pm, Tim Bradshaw wrote:
>
> There are several existing systems which do this. The HP48 (and
> descendants I expect) support "units" which are essentially dimensions.
> I don't remember if it signals errors for incoherent dimensions.
> Mathematica also has some units support, a
In article <87fwwvrnmf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>,
Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
>namekuseijin writes:
>
>>> in C I can have a function maximum(int a, int b) that will always
>>> work. Never blow up, and never give an invalid answer. If someone
>>> tries to call it incorrectly it is a compi
"Malcolm McLean" wrote in message
news:1d6e115c-cada-46fc-9444-01e80e0af...@c10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
your values (of whatever numerical ty
On 28/09/2010 10:27, AlexWalk wrote:
In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit), accessing __class__ of an
int literal will raise a SyntaxException, while other literals will not. For
example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__ runs ok.
I searched the python issue tracker but
On 2010-09-28 10:55:19 +0100, Malcolm McLean said:
I'd like to design a language like this. If you add a quantity in
inches to a quantity in centimetres you get a quantity in (say)
metres. If you multiply them together you get an area, if you divide
them you get a dimeionless scalar. If you divi
Malcolm McLean writes:
> On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
> wrote:
>>
>> On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
>> your values (of whatever numerical type) in a symbolic expression
>> mentionning the unit and perhaps other meta da
In python 3.1.2(I'm using windows edition, 32bit), accessing __class__ of an
int literal will raise a SyntaxException, while other literals will not. For
example. 1.__class__ is an error, while 1.1.__class__ runs ok.
I searched the python issue tracker but failed to find relevant reports. I
w
On Sep 27, 9:29 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
>
> On the other hand, with the dynamic typing mindset, you might even wrap
> your values (of whatever numerical type) in a symbolic expression
> mentionning the unit and perhaps other meta data, so that when the other
> modu
On Sep 27, 7:46 pm, namekuseijin wrote:
> On 27 set, 05:46, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>
> Fact is: almost all user data from the external words comes into
> programs as strings. No typesystem or compiler handles this fact all
> that graceful...- Hide quoted text -
>
You're right. C should have a
The thing is that the (\=|...) group is not really part of the match.
I think this gives you more the idea what I want
reo = re.compile( r'(\=|.)...' );
while True
mo = reo.search(text,pos)
if not mo: break
if text[mo.start()] == '\\'
# a pseudo match. continue after the backslash
else
The thing is that the (\=|...) group is not really part of the match.
I think this gives you more the idea what I want
reo = re.compile( r'(\=|.)...' );
while True
mo = reo.search(text,pos)
if not mo: break
if text[mo.start()] == '\\'
# a pseudo match. continue after the backslash
else
>From the documentation:
7.2.4. Regular Expression Objects, search(string[, pos[, endpos]])
... the '^' pattern character matches at the real beginning of the
string and at positions just after a newline, but not necessarily at
the index where the search is to start
But I'd like to do just th
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:45:44 -0400, Andreas Waldenburger
wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:48:06 +0200 Marco Gallotta
> wrote:
>
>> Since these are kids, we feel the nice changes in 3 such as removing
>> integer division will help in teaching. It will also remove confusion
>> when they go to downloa
82 matches
Mail list logo
