On Jun 29, 1:30 am, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> This is just stupid.
> It isn't worthy of any more elaborate response.
Well gee thanks Stephen. Why don't you just kick me in the balls while
your at it? *Maybe* you don't find it useful. *Maybe* no one will find
it useful. However, i did manage to move
On 6/28/10 10:41 PM, rantingrick wrote:
"""
I am pleased to announce optphart (alpha2)!
This is just stupid.
It isn't worthy of any more elaborate response.
You just don't get the point, do you?
--
... Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
Third World War is Coming - Who is Webster Tarpley ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLaaPBV9nqA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV6oKRnM4mY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y53R_h-OZAM
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"""
I am pleased to announce optphart (alpha2)!
---
What is optphart?
---
optphart is the nemisis of the asinine interfaces and bulky libraries
you may be accustomed to in the stdlib. All of which clog your scripts
with wasted lines and your memory with complex int
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message , Kushal
> Kumaran wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> wrote:
>>
>>>In message , Kushal
>>> Kumaran wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
>
On 28 jun, 22:35, ejosvp wrote:
> I have a problem with pydev 1.5.8
>
> An error has occurred. See error log for more details.
> com.aptana.editor.common.CommonEditorPlugin.getThemeManager()Lcom/
> aptana/editor/common/theme/IThemeManager;
>
> I seek the file and that file does not exist
my log i
I have a problem with pydev 1.5.8
An error has occurred. See error log for more details.
com.aptana.editor.common.CommonEditorPlugin.getThemeManager()Lcom/
aptana/editor/common/theme/IThemeManager;
I seek the file and that file does not exist
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
On 29 Jun, 05:11, Ryan Kelly wrote:
> Very interesting idea. Will it work if accessed through ctypes?
>
> ticker = ctypes.c_int.in_dll(ctypes.pythonapi,"_Py_Ticker")
> ticker.value = 0x7fff
>
> Or does ctypes muck with the GIL in a way that would break this idea?
>
>>> ctypes.pythonap
On Jun 28, 11:47 pm, rantingrick wrote:
> Give your *script* an
> enema, and do *yourself* a favor by harnessing the simplistic elegance
> of the "optphart" module instead!
>
> #-- Start Script --#
> def optphart(args):
> d = {'args':[]}
> for arg in args:
> if arg.startswith('-'):
On Jun 28, 9:56 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> Michele Simionato writes:
> > optparse is so old-fashioned. Use plac!
>
> The OP should be made aware that:
>
> * plac is a third-party library with (TTBOMK) no prospect of inclusion
> in the standard library
>
> * optparse is in the standard library and
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:07:29 -0700, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Coding for something like a DBTG network database did not allow for
> easy changes in queries... What would be a simple join in SQL was
> traversing a circular linked list in the DBTG database my college
> taught. EG: loop get nex
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:12:47 +0100, Rhodri James wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:57:45 +0100, John Nagle wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2010 7:58 AM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>>> How does a program return anything other than an exit code?
>>
>> Ah, yes, the second biggest design mistake in UNIX.
>>
>>
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 19:45 -0700, sturlamolden wrote:
> > > Many lockless algorithms that I have looked at thusfar require a
> > > "Compare and Swap" operation. Does python have an equivalent to this?
> > > Is python high level enough that it has something better than this or
> > > it simply doesn
Dear all,
I have 2 lists stored in 2 text files may have duplicated records, the raw
data looks like this:
lfruit lcountry
== =
orange japan
pearchina
> > Many lockless algorithms that I have looked at thusfar require a
> > "Compare and Swap" operation. Does python have an equivalent to this?
> > Is python high level enough that it has something better than this or
> > it simply doesn't need it?
Python does have a GIL, and contrary to the title
> > Many lockless algorithms that I have looked at thusfar require a
> > "Compare and Swap" operation. Does python have an equivalent to this?
> > Is python high level enough that it has something better than this or
> > it simply doesn't need it?
Python does have a GIL, and contrary to the title
On 06/27/10 23:20, quoth GrayShark:
> Thanks for the help
> That was what I was looking for. All the rest, the arguments were
> unhelpful.
>
> Question: If you can't answer the question, why are you talking?
>
> I'm American Indian. That's what I was taught. We don't talk that much.
> But you
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:37:44 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Brian Blais writes:
>
>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 14:25 , Chris Rebert wrote:
>> > __doc__ is normally defined on classes, e.g. `A`, not instances, e.g.
>> > `a`. help() looks for __doc__ accordingly.
>>
>> so that gets back to my original quest
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:55:53 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
> The nice thing about null-terminated strings is how portable they have
> been over various word lengths. Life would have been truly inconvenient
> if K&R had picked, say, a 16-bit length field, and then we needed to
> bump that up to 32 bits
I'm looking for a good way to check whether a certain string is
valid. It is a string representation of a Python timedelta object,
like this: '0:00:03.695000'
(But the first place, the hours, could also be double digits)
In trying to figure out how to validate that, I saw this page which
create
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 18:27 -0700, Zac Burns wrote:
>
>
>
> I've managed to avoid locking in some cases by using
> dict.setdefault() as a kind of atomic test-and-set operation.
> It's not a full compare-and-swap but you could implement a
> simple locking sch
>
> Sure, but I think you're timing the wrong thing here. You would only
> allocate the lock relatively rarely - it's the overhead of *acquiring*
> the lock that's the real problem.
>
> r...@durian:~$ python -m timeit -s "from threading import Lock; l =
> Lock()" "l.acquire(); l.release()"
> 1
On 6/28/2010 12:25 AM, John Nagle wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not what's happening in the development
pipeline.
Please do some research before posting year-old news as current news.
> Unladen Swallow targets Python 2.6.1.
It used 2.6 for development because that was the current stable relea
In article <7xmxuffpxp@ruckus.brouhaha.com>,
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Gregory Ewing writes:
> > I don't think it was as stupid as that back when C was
> > designed. Every byte of memory was precious in those days,
> > and if you had, say, 10 bytes allocated for a string, you
> > wanted to be abl
Stefan,
Thank you for trying Benchmarker library.
On Jun 28, 6:39 pm, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Makoto Kuwata, 26.06.2010 19:09:
>
> > I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
> >http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
>
> > Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
>
> Does it use any statistica
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
> In article ,
> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>>No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
>>contexts.
>
> I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that*
> much? Really?" The implication being that
Hi All,
Pydev 1.5.8 has been released
Details on Pydev: http://pydev.org
Details on its development: http://pydev.blogspot.com
Release Highlights:
---
* Features only available on Aptana Studio 3 (Beta):
* Theming support provided by Aptana Studio used
* Fi
Brian Blais writes:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 14:25 , Chris Rebert wrote:
> > __doc__ is normally defined on classes, e.g. `A`, not instances,
> > e.g. `a`. help() looks for __doc__ accordingly.
>
> so that gets back to my original question: can I change this text at
> runtime. Doesn't look like I c
In message , Nobody wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:36:10 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> Except nobody has yet shown an alternative which is easier to get right.
>
> For SQL, use stored procedures or prepared statements.
So feel free to rewrite my example using either stored procedures
In message
<14e44c9c-04d9-452d-b544-498adfaf7...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, Carl
Banks wrote:
> Seriously, almost every other kind of library uses a binary API. What
> makes databases so special that they need a string-command based API?
HTML is also effectively a string-based API. And what a
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:46 -0700, Zac Burns wrote:
> In my experience it is far more expensive to allocate a lock in python
> then it is the types that use them. Here are some examples:
>
> >>> timeit.timeit('Lock()', 'from threading import Lock')
> 1.4449114807669048
>
> >>> timeit.timeit('dict
On Jun 28, 2010, at 14:25 , Chris Rebert wrote:
On Jun 27, 2010, at 22:37 , Red Forks wrote:
Read you doc file and set the __doc__ attr of the object you want to
change.
__doc__ is normally defined on classes, e.g. `A`, not instances, e.g.
`a`. help() looks for __doc__ accordingly.
Cheers,
In message , Kushal
Kumaran wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> wrote:
>
>>In message , Kushal
>> Kumaran wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>> wrote:
>>>
A long while ago I came up with this macro:
#define Descr(v) &v,
In my experience it is far more expensive to allocate a lock in python then
it is the types that use them. Here are some examples:
>>> timeit.timeit('Lock()', 'from threading import Lock')
1.4449114807669048
>>> timeit.timeit('dict()')
0.2821554294221187
>>> timeit.timeit('list()')
0.17358153222
On 29/06/2010 00:21, Alexander Kapps wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/06/2010 20:23, Alexander Kapps wrote:
UHHM! Forget it. This of course doesn't work with setattr too. My
stupidness. :-(
Don't worry too much, looks like your nation's football is much better
than your settattr knowledge.
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/06/2010 20:23, Alexander Kapps wrote:
UHHM! Forget it. This of course doesn't work with setattr too. My
stupidness. :-(
Don't worry too much, looks like your nation's football is much better
than your settattr knowledge.
I very much appreciate your attempt to make
pysandbox is a Python sandbox. By default, untrusted code executed in
the sandbox cannot modify the environment (write a file, use print or
import a module). But you can configure the sandbox to choose exactly
which features are allowed or not, eg. import sys module and read /etc/
issue file.
Webs
On 6/28/2010 10:49 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Now, if you are entering a generator where its not 'on its own' and its
not ambiguous-- such as inside a function call-- you don't have to
surround it by its own parens. So you don't have to do f((i for i in
range(4)).
You need another ) on the end.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:57:45 +0100, John Nagle wrote:
On 6/28/2010 7:58 AM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
How does a program return anything other than an exit code?
Ah, yes, the second biggest design mistake in UNIX.
Programs have "argv" and "argc", plus environment variables,
going in.
On Jun 28, 10:44 am, Michele Simionato
wrote:
> optparse is so old-fashioned. Use plac!
Hog wash! Both are archaic and asinine. Both clog your scripts with
wasted lines and your memory with complex interfaces far worse than
colon clogging junk food can hold a candle to. Give your *script* an
ene
On 28/06/2010 20:23, Alexander Kapps wrote:
Alexander Kapps wrote:
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Alexander Kapps a écrit :
(snip)
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand
why some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, th
> Until such time as 100% of the systems I might ever want to run my progams
> on have python 3 installed, I cannot port my programs over from python 2.
You don't have to port them from python 2, but still could it make easy
to use them with Python 3: just arrange it so that 2to3 will correctly
co
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-06-28, geremy condra wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> Stephen Hansen ? wrote:
No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
contexts.
>>>
>>
On 06/28/2010 02:06 PM, Mithrandir wrote:
> I can't see Python as an alt. to bash. (As I recall) Python is much more
> object-oriented than bash, but also there are many commands (such as apt-
> get, etc.) that would need Python equivs. However, I can see Python being
> used as a scripting alt. t
On 6/28/10 3:09 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article,
Stephen Hansen wrote:
Any other use, I basically operate on a file object.
I use file objects all the time. I use print with them.
The 2to3 conversion script takes care of this for you.
[~]$ 2to3 foo.py
RefactoringTool: Skipping impli
On 06/28/2010 02:31 PM, Aahz wrote:
> In article ,
> Michael Torrie wrote:
>> True. But you can't really criticize a language's implementation of OOP
>> without a good understanding of the "pure" OO language. For example, in
>> Smalltalk If/Then statements are actually methods of Boolean object
On 2010-06-28, geremy condra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Stephen Hansen ? wrote:
>>>
>>>No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
>>>contexts.
>>
>> I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that*
> >>> i.__add__ = __add__
> >>> i+1
> 6
> >>>
>
> Was this in reference to a specific python version?
This doesn't work with new style classes and thus not in Python 3.x.
Subclass from object and you'll see the difference.
Christian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 6/28/10 1:30 PM, geremy condra wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article,
Stephen Hansen wrote:
No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
contexts.
I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that*
much? Really?"
On 6/28/10 1:13 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 6/28/2010 12:02 PM Benjamin Kaplan said...
Just to save the OP some trouble later on: this optimization is done
for most of the __*__ methods. Overriding __add__ on an instance won't
change the behavior of a + b.
ActivePython 2.4.1 Build 247 (Act
On 06/28/2010 10:13 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 6/28/2010 12:02 PM Benjamin Kaplan said...
>> Just to save the OP some trouble later on: this optimization is done
>> for most of the __*__ methods. Overriding __add__ on an instance won't
>> change the behavior of a + b.
>
> ActivePython 2.4.1
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 6/28/2010 12:02 PM Benjamin Kaplan said...
>
> Just to save the OP some trouble later on: this optimization is done
>> for most of the __*__ methods. Overriding __add__ on an instance won't
>> change the behavior of a + b.
>>
>
> Act
In article ,
Michael Torrie wrote:
>On 06/27/2010 11:58 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>> To say you can't really know "much about" OOP without knowing "much
>> about" Smalltalk seems basically, well, wrong.
>
>True. But you can't really criticize a language's implementation of OOP
>without a goo
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
> In article ,
> Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>>No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
>>contexts.
>
> I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that*
> much? Really?" The implication being that
On 6/28/10 1:06 PM, Mithrandir wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote in
news:7xpqzbj8st@ruckus.brouhaha.com:
Re: Python as a scripting language. Alternative to bash script?
That's interesting but I'm having a hard time seeing how it would work.
I think environment variables didn't exist in early vers
On 6/28/2010 12:02 PM Benjamin Kaplan said...
Just to save the OP some trouble later on: this optimization is done
for most of the __*__ methods. Overriding __add__ on an instance won't
change the behavior of a + b.
ActivePython 2.4.1 Build 247 (ActiveState Corp.) based on
Python 2.4.1 (#65, Ju
In article ,
Stephen Hansen wrote:
>
>Any other use, I basically operate on a file object.
I use file objects all the time. I use print with them.
--
-Ed Falk, f...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article ,
Stephen Hansen wrote:
>
>No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such
>contexts.
I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that*
much? Really?" The implication being that in the majority of useful
python programs, you don't really need to
Paul Rubin wrote in
news:7xpqzbj8st@ruckus.brouhaha.com:
> Re: Python as a scripting language. Alternative to bash script?
> That's interesting but I'm having a hard time seeing how it would work.
> I think environment variables didn't exist in early versions of Unix,
> and argc/argv were p
On 6/28/10 12:54 PM, rantingrick wrote:
On Jun 27, 10:20 pm, GrayShark wrote:
Question: If you can't answer the question, why are you talking?
Q: If you can't take advice without complaining, then why are you
asking?
I'm American Indian. That's what I was taught. We don't talk that much.
Bu
In article ,
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>Maybe it's just me, but I find both debugging and small scripts to be
>very useful.
Ditto. I've also written a number of large scripts, and I *always*
use print in them.
--
-Ed Falk, f...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
On Monday 28 June 2010 12:46:13 Zohair M. Abu Shaban wrote:
> Hello every one:
>
>
> I have this python function defined as:
>
> def set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs):
>
> """set_time_at_next_pps(self, usrp2::time_spec_t time_spec)
> -> bool"""
>
>
>
> it was generated to do t
Michele Simionato writes:
> optparse is so old-fashioned. Use plac!
The OP should be made aware that:
* plac is a third-party library with (TTBOMK) no prospect of inclusion
in the standard library
* optparse is in the standard library and has been for many versions
* argparse is a third-par
On Jun 27, 10:20 pm, GrayShark wrote:
> Question: If you can't answer the question, why are you talking?
Q: If you can't take advice without complaining, then why are you
asking?
> I'm American Indian. That's what I was taught. We don't talk that much.
> But you get an answer when we do talk. Ma
On 06/27/2010 11:58 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> To say you can't really know "much about" OOP without knowing "much
> about" Smalltalk seems basically, well, wrong.
True. But you can't really criticize a language's implementation of OOP
without a good understanding of the "pure" OO language. Fo
Hello every one:
I have this python function defined as:
def set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs):
"""set_time_at_next_pps(self, usrp2::time_spec_t time_spec)
-> bool"""
it was generated to do the same function as the c++:
set_time_at_next_pps(usrp2::time_spec_t(0, 0))
I
On 06/25/2010 09:39 PM, WANG Cong wrote:
> Thanks, I have to admit that I know nothing about Smalltalk.
If you know nothing about Smalltalk then you really aren't in a position
to talk about what is and is not OOP. Smalltalk is one of the original
OOP languages and purists define OOP as the model
On 6/28/10 12:09 PM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
This seems to work quite well:
class TypoProtection(object):
def __init__(self):
self.foo = 42
self.bar = 24
def _setattr(self, name, value):
if name in self.__dict__:
self.__dict__[name] = value
else:
raise AttributeError, "%s has no '%s' attribute"
Alexander Kapps wrote:
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Alexander Kapps a écrit :
(snip)
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand
why some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Alexander Kapps a écrit :
(snip)
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand
why some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won't happen anymore. What
On Jun 28, 12:58 pm, "OKB (not okblacke)"
wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > None of PyPy, Unladen Swallow or IronPython are dependencies for
> > Python 3.x to be "ready for prime time". Neither is C module
> > support.
>
> I think this is being overoptimistic. For me, "ready for prime
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brian Blais wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2010, at 22:37 , Red Forks wrote:
>>> Read you doc file and set the __doc__ attr of the object you want to
>>> change.
>>>
>>> On Monday, June 28, 2010, Brian Blais wrote:
>
On 6/28/2010 9:10 AM Victor Subervi said...
Any other suggestions?
http://www.databaseanswers.org/tutorial4_db_schema/index.htm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John Nagle writes:
>Programs have "argv" and "argc", plus environment variables,
> going in. So, going in, there are essentially subroutine parameters.
> But all that comes back is an exit code. They should have had
> something similar coming back, with arguments to "exit()" returning
> the r
On 06/28/2010 12:05 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 28 June 2010 18:39, Michael Torrie wrote:
>
>> Sure. I've created a module called runcmd that does 90% of what I
>> want (easy access to stdout, stderr, error code). I've attached
>> it to this e-mail. Feel free to use it; this post puts my code
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brian Blais wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2010, at 22:37 , Red Forks wrote:
>> Read you doc file and set the __doc__ attr of the object you want to
>> change.
>>
>> On Monday, June 28, 2010, Brian Blais wrote:
>>> I know that the help text for an object will give a descrip
On Jun 27, 2010, at 22:37 , Red Forks wrote:
Read you doc file and set the __doc__ attr of the object you want
to change.
On Monday, June 28, 2010, Brian Blais wrote:
I know that the help text for an object will give a description of
every method based on the doc string. Is there a way t
On 28 June 2010 18:39, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 05:48 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> Main queries are: Ease of calling out to bash to use something like
>> imageMagick or Java? Ease of grabbing return parameters? E.g. convert
>> can return both height and width of an image. Can this be ret
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> None of PyPy, Unladen Swallow or IronPython are dependencies for
> Python 3.x to be "ready for prime time". Neither is C module
> support.
I think this is being overoptimistic. For me, "ready for prime
time" means "I can rely on being able to find a way to do w
On 6/28/2010 7:58 AM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
How does a program return anything other than an exit code?
Ah, yes, the second biggest design mistake in UNIX.
Programs have "argv" and "argc", plus environment variables,
going in. So, going in, there are essentially subroutine parameters.
On Monday 28 June 2010 10:29:35 Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hi, all. I've got a file which, in turn, contains a couple thousand
> filenames. I'm writing a web front-end, and I want to return all the
> filenames that match a user-input value. In Perl, this would be something
> like,
>
> if (/$value/
On 6/28/10 10:29 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hi, all. I've got a file which, in turn, contains a couple thousand
filenames. I'm writing a web front-end, and I want to return all the
filenames that match a user-input value. In Perl, this would be something
like,
if (/$value/){print "$_ matches\n
On 06/28/2010 07:29 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hi, all. I've got a file which, in turn, contains a couple thousand
> filenames. I'm writing a web front-end, and I want to return all the
> filenames that match a user-input value. In Perl, this would be something
> like,
>
> if (/$value/){print
Hi All
I am hoping there is someone out there that knows reportlab quite well.
I posted this on the reportlab mailing list but there is not much
activity on that list
I am currently generating a pdf report using reportlab 2.3 and python
2.5.4. The report has a table that spans multiple pages
On 06/28/2010 05:48 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Main queries are: Ease of calling out to bash to use something like
> imageMagick or Java? Ease of grabbing return parameters? E.g. convert
> can return both height and width of an image. Can this be returned to
> the Python program? Can Python access th
Hi, all. I've got a file which, in turn, contains a couple thousand
filenames. I'm writing a web front-end, and I want to return all the
filenames that match a user-input value. In Perl, this would be something
like,
if (/$value/){print "$_ matches\n";}
But trying to put a variable into regex
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Stephen Hansen
wrote:
> On 6/28/10 9:10 AM, Victor Subervi wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>> So I'm launching into a major rewrite of my shopping cart because I've
>> finally woken up to the challenge of injection attacks. One of my major
>> problems is that many column names ar
On 6/28/10 9:23 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
Installing Linux is still a LOT easier than installing a working MSYS
since you get proper package management with proper dependency
resolution, while with MSYS, you end up downloading dozens of different
inter-dependent GNU packages one-by-one until anyt
In comp.lang.c++ small Pox wrote:
> Academia and Scientific and Arts community is the BIGGEST RECIPIENT of
> Federal Grants from TAX PAYER MONEY
What's so hard to understand in "take your religion elsewhere, we don't
want it here"? Go away.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth
On 6/28/10 9:10 AM, Victor Subervi wrote:
Hi;
So I'm launching into a major rewrite of my shopping cart because I've
finally woken up to the challenge of injection attacks. One of my major
problems is that many column names are determined when the shopping cart
is built. For example, how many pho
On 06/28/2010 06:08 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Thanks for the replies (and Benjamin).
> Not met with the subprocess idea.
>
> On 28 June 2010 16:29, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>
>>> Main queries are:
>>> Ease of calling out to bash to use something like imageMagick or Java?
>>
>> You don't need to ca
On 06/28/2010 04:36 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 6/28/10 2:20 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>> On 06/28/2010 03:21 AM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>> On 6/27/10 6:11 PM, geremy condra wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Grant
Edwards wrote:
> If you install a real shell on Windows, the
On 6/28/10 9:06 AM, Ratufa wrote:
Suppose I have a webapp running in a virtualenv (--no-site-packages)
cloned off a Python 2.6.2 install, running under mod_wsgi. The
virtual environment has various modules installed in it, some perhaps
using C extensions.
Question: If the Python installation
Hi;
So I'm launching into a major rewrite of my shopping cart because I've
finally woken up to the challenge of injection attacks. One of my major
problems is that many column names are determined when the shopping cart is
built. For example, how many photos are to be uploaded is determined that
wa
Thanks for the replies (and Benjamin).
Not met with the subprocess idea.
On 28 June 2010 16:29, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> Main queries are:
>> Ease of calling out to bash to use something like imageMagick or Java?
>
> You don't need to call bash to call an external program. Check out the
> sub
Suppose I have a webapp running in a virtualenv (--no-site-packages) cloned
off a Python 2.6.2 install, running under mod_wsgi. The virtual
environment has various modules installed in it, some perhaps using C
extensions.
Question: If the Python installation gets upgraded to 2.6.5 (or 2.6.7 at
On Jun 28, 3:30 pm, dirknbr wrote:
> I get an int object is not callable TypeError when I execute this. But
> I don't understand why.
>
> parser = optparse.OptionParser("usage: %lines [options] arg1")
> parser.add_option("-l", "--lines", dest="lines",
> default=10, ty
On 6/28/10 8:27 AM, Aahz wrote:
In article<4c285e7c$0$17371$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Aahz a écrit :
In article<4c2747c1$0$4545$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Python has no pretention at "elegance".
That's not true at all. More precisely, I wo
In article <4c285e7c$0$17371$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>Aahz a écrit :
>> In article <4c2747c1$0$4545$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
>> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>>
>>> Python has no pretention at "elegance".
>>
>> That's not true at all. More precisely, I would agree wit
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:48:51 +0100
Dave Pawson wrote:
> I've a fairly long bash script and I'm wondering
> how easy it would be to port to Python.
That's too big a question without seeing more of what your script
does. I will try to suggest some direction though.
First, if you have a complicate
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
