Chris Angelico wrote:
> I've just updated PEP 671 https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0671/
> Questions, for you all:
> 1) If this feature existed in Python 3.11 exactly as described, would
> you use it?
When needed, but I'm uncomfortable with the syntax.
> 2) Independently: Is the syntactic dist
Brendan Barnwell wrote:
> > No. As I mentioned in the earlier thread, I don't support any proposal
> in which an argument can "have a default" but that default is not a
> first-class Python object of some sort.
What if a default is a function?
I was inspired by learning Django and saw in model
