Hi folks:
I was recently looking for an entry-level cpython task to work on in
my spare time and plucked this off of someone's TODO list.
"Make optimizations more fine-grained than just -O and -OO"
There are currently three supported optimization levels (0, 1, and 2).
Briefly summarized, the
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:48:15 -0600
Diana Clarke
wrote:
>
> 2) Added a new command line option N that allows you to specify
> any number of individual optimization flags.
>
> For example:
>
> python -N nodebug -N noassert -N nodocstring
We could instead reuse the existing -X opt
On 28 September 2017 at 08:27, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 September 2017 at 19:28, Ivan Levkivskyi
> wrote:
> > If an object that is not a class object appears in the bases of a class
> > definition, the ``__subclass_base__`` is searched on it. If found,
> > it is called with the original tuple
> 2) Added a new command line option N that allows you to specify
> any number of individual optimization flags.
>
> For example:
>
> python -N nodebug -N noassert -N nodocstring
You may want to look at my PEP 511 which proposes to add a new "-o"
option to specify a list of optimiz
Yup. I referenced your pep a few times in a previous off-list email,
but I omitted that paragraph from this pass because I was using it to
bolster the previous "level 3" idea (which didn't fly).
"""
This simple approach to new optimization levels also appears to be
inline with the direction Victor
Perhaps I should be a bit clearer.
When I said the "level 3" approach "appears to be inline with the
direction Victor Stinner is going in for PEP 511", it was mostly at a
superficial level. Meaning:
- PEP 511 still appears to use integer (unnamed) optimization levels
for alternate transformers (f
Hi there,
I have posted an idea for improvement with a PR of an implementation to
https://bugs.python.org/issue31603.
The basic idea is to add fin, fout, and ferr file object parameters and default
to using what is used today when the args are not specified. I believe this
would be useful to
I'm fine with the idea in general of extra keyword parameters to the input
function.
A few points:
Your example code, needs try/catch to match what the input with parameters
does -- and yes, its way nicer to be able to use it the example you have
shown than play games with try/catch (Personally I
On 29 September 2017 at 08:04, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> On 28 September 2017 at 08:27, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> On 27 September 2017 at 19:28, Ivan Levkivskyi
>> wrote:
>> > If an object that is not a class object appears in the bases of a class
>> > definition, the ``__subclass_base__`` is sea
