On 12/03/2016 05:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Though I believe the default sys.excepthook function is currently written in
C, so it wouldn't be very easy for distributors to customize it. Maybe it
could be made to read module=error_message pairs from some external file,
which would be easier to mod
On 12/05/2016 01:42 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 12/03/2016 05:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Though I believe the default sys.excepthook function is currently written
in
C, so it wouldn't be very easy for distributors to customize it. Maybe it
could
On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> On 12/03/2016 05:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>>
>>> Though I believe the default sys.excepthook function is currently written
>>> in
>>> C, so it wouldn't be very easy for distributors to customize it. Maybe it
>>> could be made to read module=err
On 5 December 2016 at 22:53, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> On 12/05/2016 01:42 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Essentially, that would be the "name.missing.py" part of the draft
>> proposal for optional standard library modules, just with a regular
>> "name.py" module name and a tweak to getpath.c.
>
> To my e
