29.05.20 14:22, Serhiy Storchaka пише:
I prefer it to be an alternative float constructor. We can also add the
corresponding constructor for complex, and add constructors which accept
only str, bytes or bytes-like object (i.e. parse a text representation
of the number). See also previous discus
On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:48:53 -
"Mark Dickinson"
wrote:
>
> I have a proof-of-concept PR [1] that exposes this in the `operator` module
> as `operator.as_float`. See also the discussion on the tracker [2].
`operator.as_float` sounds good to me. There's the `operator.index`
precedent.
Regar
29.05.20 12:48, Mark Dickinson пише:
2. Call the object's `__float__` method. But this is fraught with peril, too:
for a proper equivalent, you need to be careful to look up `__float__` on the
type, not the object itself. And then a new version of Python changes
`PyFloat_AsDouble` to also acce
