[Python-ideas] Re: asyncio.Pipe()

;>> Python 3.9.1 documentation >>> <https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-subprocess.html> >>> >>> Was that not sufficient to solve your problem? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 5:23 AM Roger Iyengar >>> wrote: &

[Python-ideas] Re: asyncio.Pipe()

ficient to solve your problem? > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 5:23 AM Roger Iyengar wrote: > >> I believe that asyncio should have a way to wait for input from a >> different process without blocking the event loop. >> >> The Asyncio module currently contains a

[Python-ideas] asyncio.Pipe()

I believe that asyncio should have a way to wait for input from a different process without blocking the event loop. The Asyncio module currently contains a Queue class that allows communication between multiple coroutines running on the same event loop. However, this module is not threadsafe or p